Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Then, I get that Vester Flanagan was carefully chosen. They wanted an African American, homosexual, mentally unbalanced man using a gun that was said to have been purchased legally. I see some key people set out to get his temper rising (it looks like an interview??), which preyed upon his mental imbalance, and created a situation where he would be agreeable to go through with this. What he didn’t realize was that the gun supplied to him (under his name) was not loaded with real bullets, but rather blanks.
I hear he was “the perfect unicorn to spark another gun debate with sprinkles of racial differences.” Not only does this evoke tension in this area, but it gives military another reason to have a presence there as well. The government is slowly getting people “used” to the idea of a military presence as more and more false flags occur. The goal looks to have us be in a police state where we are scared to speak out.
Q. Did Alison Parker really get shot and die?
A. I get that she did not, and is really hidden away (like a witness in protection) with her real boyfriend. She was nothing more than friends with Adam Ward, and this was set up to look like something it wasn’t. Tuning into Adam, I see an actor trying to fulfill a role. Alison agreed to be a part of this with the reward of a new life, with her real love, and was paid a lot of money to do so. I also see that she isn’t even in the United States, but rather somewhere tropical (with her real boyfriend, which is not Adam Ward).
France Train Attack:
Q. Thanks for all you do, Lynn! I love checking your site each day to see what’s new! Something about the recent “train” attack in France (where the would-be heavily-armed terrorist was taken down and captured by three unarmed Americans) doesn’t sit well with me. The whole thing just seems a bit too “coincidental” and contrived. If these three individuals are genuine heroes, I certainly don’t wish to take away from their bravery–but something here just doesn’t resonate. What’s your take on this? Thanks,
A. When I tune into this, I hear the word “propaganda.” As a go a little deeper I get that the US has been getting some bad press in other countries (and even our own). The idea of ISIS has been spreading about, and fear on terror. The US is in many countries to protects its’ assets, and other countries are tired of the influence and control. This event was really a way to try to paint the US as the “good guys” out to help everyone, and have a positive story in the news. I hear that this is a story of showing how to create a problem, and a solution in one instant.
And that is all I have for this reading. Thank you. Love and light-