Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Retroactive on Demand For Lawful Money?

Monday, September 28, 2015 13:54
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Retroactive on Demand For Lawful Money?

What I have seen and heard is that the “lawful money and full discharge is demanded for all transactions per 12 USC 411, 95a(2)” is only accessible thru the Internal Revenue Service with your 1040 return.


This is for the Completion for the “Promise to Pay” on the Federal Reserve Note, or else you have that “Promise to Pay” till the day you die.


There cannot be any retroactive for collecting on the funds as it can only be for when you start placing it on your checks and deposit slips?


And then really it can only be for your employment and not the general transactions at the bank for your bills and purchases?


When did the HJR 192 only apply to your wages and taxes?


How can a “Discharge of Debt” be for Income when it is NOT a purchase or a debt?


The banks used the HJR 192 and now the 12 USC 411, 95a(2) to get your Signature to instantly make the funds in their accounts to then write you a legal check for your purchase, but then that cannot be included on your 1040 form for a deduction?


Go ahead and try it with writing a letter to your bank for your loans, and even previous ones, to get the money back, and write the full amount due on a check with that “Demand for Lawful Money” on it and see if the CEO would accept it.


And I would write three checks, as for a home loan, one would be for the transfer price of your old home, the second would be for the amount still due, and the third for the amount already paid, and this would then be a FULL “Discharge of Dept”!


If they want to file criminal charges against you then you have all the evidence with that letter explaining everything, and then they should have a hard time trying to keep that out of the case and then they shouldn’t have someone just stating the bank customer wrote as fraudulent check for which they cannot present in court, but some judge would just allow it on a fraudulent testimony.


Do the same with filing your amended tax returns and see how they work it as they only go back three years, but then your “Promise to Pay” is for all previous years before that and you are still Liable for them, so just keep going one year after another, each week filing one, and not all combined to then see when they will reject it or give you a check.


Why don’t you just go one after another on all you credit card companies and then write them a check for not just the amount owed but previous amount already paid and see whether you get a larger credit, an actual check to cash back, or your bank sends you a check, but just start off on one first.

NESARA- Restore America – Galactic News



Source: http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2015/09/retroactive-on-demand-for-lawful-money.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.