Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Your Updated Legal Rights Protected By Law! Forwarded By Erasmus Of America – September 3, 2015

Friday, September 4, 2015 16:00
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

YOUR UPDATED LEGAL RIGHTS PROTECTED BY LAW! FORWARDED BY ERASMUS OF AMERICA – SEPTEMBER 3, 2015


YOUR UPDATED LEGAL RIGHTS PROTECTED BY LAW! FORWARDED BY ERASMUS OF AMERICA – COPYRIGHTED 2015. MAY BE REPRINTED AND COPIED IF PRINTED IN FULL. – NIFI, P.O. BOX 1465, SENECA, SC 29679 . WWW.FASTBOOMAMERICANECONOMY.COM[email protected]

 
     LEGAL NOTE FOR LAWYERS WHO DEPEND TOO STRONGLY ON CASE LAW INSTEAD OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION NEED TO BE REMINDED THAT JUDGES BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE ARE SWORN TO UPHOLD THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, NOT CASE LAW.
     “THIS CONSTITUTION, AND THE LAWS MADE IN PURSUANCE THEREOF, SHALL BE THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND; AND THE JUDGES IN EVERY STATE SHALL BE BOUND THEREBY, ANY THING IN THE CONSTITUTION OR LAWS OF ANY STATE TO THE CONTRARY NOTWITHSTANDING…AND ALL OFFICERS BOTH OF THE UNITED STATES AND OF THE SEVERAL STATES SHALL BE BOUND BY OATH TO SUPPORT THIS CONSTITUTION.” – ARTICLE 6, U.S. CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES

     THE PREAMBLE TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION STATES WRITTEN BY AUTHORITY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  

     THE PREAMBLE TO THE U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION ADDED LATER IS STATING THAT THE FOLLOWING U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS  ADDED BY RATIFICATION OF THEIR ADDITION TO THE  U.S. CONSTITUTION ARE HIGHER LEGAL AUTHORITY THAN THE REST OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION IF CONFLICT IN STATED AUTHORITY OCCURS BETWEEN THESE TWO PARTS OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. THE PREAMBLE TO THE U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS AS WRITTEN BY THE U.S. CONGRESS INCLUDES SUPERIOR AUTHORITY OF 10 U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS OVER REST OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.  THIS LEGAL SECTION SHOWN: 
  Image result for PREAMBLE TO THE U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS  Image result for PREAMBLE TO THE FIRST TEN AMENDMENTS

     THESE PRINCIPLES COME FROM AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE WITH SUPPORT FROM CASES FAR TOO NUMEROUS TO LIST IN THIS REPORT COVERING AUTHORITY OF THE PEOPLE AND ARTICLE 1 SECTION 10: 1. NO PUBLIC POLICY OF A STATE CAN BE ALLOWED TO OVERRIDE THE POSITIVE GUARANTIES OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION. (16 AMJUR 2ND., 70) 2. NO EMERGENCY CAN JUSTIFY THE VIOLATION OF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF OUR UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. (16 AMJUR 2ND, 71)  3. NEITHER ANY EMERGENCY NOR ECONOMIC NECESSITY JUSTIFIES A DISREGARD OF CARDINAL CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTIES. (16 AMJUR 2ND, 81) 4. ANY ATTEMPT TO DO THINGS WHICH ARE PRESCRIBED IN THE CONSTITUTION IN ANY MANNER OTHER THAN THAT PRESCRIBED (FOR EXAMPLE OBAMA WITH INVALID EXECUTIVE ORDERS!), OR TO DO THAT WHICH IS PROHIBITED IS REPUGNANT TO THAT SUPREME, PARAMOUNT LAW AND IS INVALID (OBAMA AGAIN WITH EXECUTIVE ORDERS NOT AUTHORIZED BY THE CONSTITUTION) (16 AMJUR 2ND), 82)
     AS CHARLES RIELY ONCE STATED, “IT WILL NOT BE THE LAWYERS, POLITICIANS OR BUREAUCRATS WHO SAVE AMERICA. IT WILL BE THE PEOPLE WHO WORK WITH THEIR HANDS. HOUSEWIVES, TRUCKERS, CARPENTERS, AND FARMERS WILL TURN THIS COUNTRY AROUND.” AND OTHER CATEGORIES OF AMERICANS NOT LISTED BY HIM CAN BE ADDED TO THIS LIST OF THE AMERICANS WHO CAN AND SHOULD SAVE AMERICA AS THE PROFESSIONAL CAREER LEADERS IN WASH., D.C. APPARENTLY ARE A LOST CAUSE TO SAVE AMERICA AT THIS TIME! THEY SHADOW BOX WITH ISSUES THAT MUST BE FACED AND RESPONSIBLY SOLVED NOW, NOT IGNORED UNTIL AMERICA IS RUINED BY THESE PROBLEMS CREATED BUT NOT SOLVED BY THE CURRENT LEADERS IN WASH., D.C.
     I LIKE THE LEGAL INTEGRITY SHOWN BY THE QUOTE BELOW OF JUSTICE HUGO BLACK, IN COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY’S CHARPENTIER LECTURES, 1968: “THE PUBLIC WELFARE DEMANDS THAT CONSTITUTIONAL CASES MUST BE DECIDED ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF OUR CONSTITUTION ITSELF, AND NOT ACCORDING TO JUDGES’ VIEWS OF FAIRNESS, REASONABLENESS, OR JUSTICE. I HAVE NO FEAR OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS PROPERLY ADOPTED, BUT I DO FEAR THE REWRITING OF THE CONSTITUTION BY JUDGES UNDER THE GUISE OF INTERPRETATION.”
     MY CONCEPT OF THE STANDARD BY WHICH ANY FORM OF GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE JUDGED IS WHETHER IT DOES A GOOD JOB OF MANAGING THE RESOURCES OF THE NATION WELL, BOOMING THE ECONOMY, AND MAINTAINING THE GOD-GIVEN FREEDOM AND LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE OF THE NATION. LAWS CAN BE USED FOR GOOD OR EVIL DEPENDING ON THE MOTIVES OF THE LEADERS USING LAWS IN THE NATION.

     THE U.S. SUPREME COURT HAS RULED THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OR OFFICIALS OR EMPLOYEES CAN BE LIABLE FOR FINANCIAL DAMAGES TO THE INNOCENT AMERICAN CITIZEN THAT THEY HAVE WRONGED. FOR EXAMPLE: “THE INNOCENT INDIVIDUAL WHO IS HARMED BY AN ABUSE OF GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY IS ASSURED THAT HE WILL BE COMPENSATED FOR HIS INJURY.” – OWEN VS. CITY OF INDEPENDENCE, 100 S. CT. 1398 (1980)

      NOW IS A HANDY LISTING OF MANY LEGAL RIGHTS WHICH ARE PROTECTED BY TECHNICAL LAW AT THIS TIME. KEEP THIS LIST FOR YOUR REFERENCE AND ADD OTHER DECISIONS, ETC. WHICH SHOW YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED BY LAW WHEN YOU ASSERT YOURSELF LEGALLY WHEN JUSTIFIED.
     “PEOPLE OF A STATE ARE ENTITLED TO ALL RIGHTS WHICH FORMERLY BELONGED TO THE KING BY HIS PREROGATIVE.” LANSING V SMITH,(1829) 4 WEND. 9, 20. PREROGATIVE MEANS “EXCLUSIVE RIGHT: A DISTINCTIVELY SUPERIOR ADVANTAGE.”
     “IT IS TRUE THAT AT (ENGLISH) COMMON LAW THE DUTY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WAS TO REPRESENT THE KING, HE BEING THE EMBODIMENT OF THE STATE. BUT UNDER THE DEMOCRATIC FORM OF GOVERNMENT NOW PREVAILING THE PEOPLE ARE KING SO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S DUTIES ARE TO THAT SOVEREIGN RATHER THAN TO THE MACHINERY OF GOVERNMENT.” HANCOCK V. TERRY ELKHORN MINING CO., INC., KY., 503 S.W. 2D 710. KY. CONST. SECTION 4. COMMONWEALTH EX REL. HANCOCK V. PAXTON, KY., 516 S.W. 2D. PG. 867 (2) CL 3.
     UNDER OUR FORM OF GOVERNMENT, THE LEGISLATURE IS NOT SUPREME. IT IS ONLY ONE OF THE ORGANS OF THE ABSOLUTE SOVEREIGNTY WHICH RESIDES IN THE WHOLE BODY OF THE PEOPLE; LIKE OTHER BODIES OF THE GOVERNMENT (AGENCIES AND COURTS!), IT CAN ONLY EXERCISE SUCH POWERS AS HAVE BEEN DELEGATED TO IT, AND WHEN IT STEPS BEYOND THAT BOUNDARY, ITS ACTS…ARE UTTERY VOID.”BILLINGS V. HALL. 7 CA. 1
     “OUR GOVERNMENT IS FOUNDED UPON COMPACT. SOVEREIGNTY WAS, AND IS, IN THE PEOPLE.”  GLASS V. THE SLOOP BETSY, 3 DALL 6
     “IT IS THE DOCTRINE OF THE COMMON LAW, THAT THE SOVEREIGN (AMERICAN CITIZEN) CANNOT BE SUED IN HIS OWN COURT WITHOUT HIS CONSENT(BY TERMS OF THE COMPACT CALLED THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS ADDED TO THE RETAINED ENGLISH COMMON LAW AS THE NATIONAL LAW OF AMERICA BEYOND AUTHORITY OF CONGRESS, COURTS, OR AGENCIES TO IGNORE, DISOBEY, AMEND BY THEIR AUTHORITY, OR TERMINATE IN AUTHORITY). THE SIREN VS. US. 74 U.S. 152
     “STATE GOVERNMENTS ARE BUT TRUSTEES ACTING UNDER A DERIVED AUTHORITY (OF THE PEOPLE)…” 4 WHEAT, 402
     “WHILE SOVEREIGN POWERS ARE DELEGATED TO THE AGENCIES OF GOVERNMENT, SOVEREIGNTY ITSELF REMAINS WITH THE PEOPLE, BY WHOM AND FOR WHOM, ALL GOVERNMENT EXISTS AND ACTS.” YICK WO VS. HOPKINS AND WOO LEE VS. HOPKINS 118 U.S. 356
     THOSE IN GOVERNMENT POSITIONS WHETHER FEDERAL OR STATE LEGISLATURES, COURTS, OR OTHER AGENCIES WHO REFUSE TO LEGALLY RESPECT AND UPHOLD THE RETAINED ENGLISH COMMON LAW RIGHTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, RIGHTS PROTECTED BY THE U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS FROM LEGAL ATTACK OR INTERFERENCE OR DENIAL OF PRACTICE IN AMERICA, AND STATUTE CIVIL RIGHTS GRANTED IN ADDITION TO THESE PERMANENT LEGAL RIGHTS WHICH NO GOVERNMENT IN AUTHORITY CAN TAKE AWAY FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, ANY GOVERNMENT AGENT OR SOURCE ENGAGING IN SUCH LEGALLY VOID ACTION OR POLICY IS LEGALLY GUILTY OF DERELICTION OF LEGAL DUTY, MALFEASANCE IN OFFICE, PERJURY OF THEIR OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO UPHOLD THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND ATTACHED U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS AS THE BINDING NATIONAL LAW OVER AMERICA, AND ALSO GUILTY OF TECHNICAL LEGAL VIOLATION OF TREASON AGAINST THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE III, SECTION 3 IN WAGING LEGAL WARFARE AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THEIR LEGAL RIGHTS AND IN ADHERING TO THE ENEMIES OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO WANT THE U.S. CONSTITUTION OVERTHROWN BY INTERNAL COUP WITHIN GOVERNMENT (FEDERAL OR STATE) IN AMERICA. LET THE FOLLOWING NOW LEGALLY WARN THOSE OF ANY LEGAL CAPACITY WHO MAY CONSPIRE OR ACTIVELY ENGAGE IN ATTEMPTED LEGAL VIOLATION OR SUPPRESSION OF ANY LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BEYOND THE DELEGATED AUTHORITY GIVEN TO GOVERNMENT BY THE ABSOLUTE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO ARE THE MASTER TO ALL LEGAL AUTHORITY AND NOT SERVANTS TO WOULD-BE LEGAL USURPERS WHO WISH TO OVERTHROW THE LEGAL AUTHORITY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OVER ALL GOVERNMENT INCLUDING COURTS IN AMERICA.
     “THE UNITED STATES ADOPTED THE COMMON LAWS OF ENGLAND WITH THE CONSTITUTION.” CALDWELL V. HILL 176 S.E. 383 (1934)

     “LAW OF THE LAND MEANS THE COMMON LAW.” TAYLOR V. PORTER4 hill. 140, STATE V. SIMON, 2 SPEARS, 761, 767

     42 U.S.C. 1983 – “EVERY PERSON WHO, UNDER COLOR OF ANY STATUTE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION, CUSTOM OR USAGE OF ANY STATE…SUBJECTS, OR CAUSES TO BE SUBJECTED ANY CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES…TO THE DEPRIVATION OF ANY RIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, OR IMMUNITIES SECURED BY THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS, SHALL BE LIABLE TO THE PARTY INJURED IN AN ACTION AT LAW, SUIT IN EQUITY, OR OTHER PROPER PROCEEDINGS FOR REDRESS.”
     WEBSTER DEFINES A REPUBLIC AS: “…A STATE OR NATION IN WHICH THE SUPREME POWER RESTS IN THE BODY OF CITIZENS…” 
     “ALL LAWS WHICH ARE REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION  ARE NULL AND VOID.” – MARBURY VS. MADISON 5 U.S. 137, 174, 176
     “NO ONE IS BOUND TO OBEY AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO ENFORCE IT.”  16 AM JUR 2D SECTION 177,LATE AM JUR 2D SECTION 256
     “ALL PERSONS ARE PRESUMED TO KNOW THE LAW. IF ANY PERSON ACTS UNDER ANY UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATUTE, HE DOES SO AT HIS OWN PERIL. HE MUST TAKE THE CONSEQUENCES.” 16 AM JUR 177, 178

     SEARCH AND SEIZURE MANUAL FOR LAW OFFICERS, PAGE 16: “THE LOSS OF EVIDENCE ISN’T THE ONLY BAD CONSEQUENCE OF AN OFFICER’S ERROR IN SEARCH AND SEIZURE. THE OFFICER MAY ALSO BE PROSECUTED BY THE US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR DEPRIVING THE CITIZEN OF HIS RIGHTS AND MAY BE SUED IN THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT. JURIES HAVE AWARDED CITIZENS UP TO $250,000.OO FOR UNLAWFUL SEARCHES AND SEIZURES. THIS MEANS THAT THE OFFICER MAY BE LAYING HIS HOUSE, CAR AND SAVINGS ACCOUNT ON THE LINE WHEN ENGAGING IN UNWARRANTED SEARCHES AND SEIZURES.”

     18 USC, CRIMINAL CODE, SECTION 241 CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS OF CITIZENS: “IF TWO OR MORE PERSONS CONSPIRE TO INJURE, OPPRESS, THREATEN OR INTIMIDATE ANY CITIZEN IN THE FREE EXERCISE OR ENJOYMENT OF ANY RIGHT OR PRIVILEGE SECURED TO HIM BY THE CONSTITUTION OR LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES, OR BECAUSE OF HIS HAVING SO EXERCISED THE SAME;…THEY SHALL BE FINED NOT MORE THAN $10,000 OR IMPRISONED NOT MORE THAN FIVE YEARS OR BOTH.” NOTHING HERE STATES THAT IRS AGENTS, FBI AGENTS, STATE POLICE, ETC. ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS FEDERAL CRIMINAL LAW!
     SUPREME COURT: BIVENS V. SIX UNKNOWN AGENTS, 403 US 388, 29 LED2D 619, 91 SCT 1999 (1990): WHEN A GOVERNMENT AGENT ACTS IN AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL MANNER THE AGENT AS OF THEN BECOMES PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR MONETARY DAMAGES.
     STOKWITZ V. US: TAXPAYER ALLEGING UNLAWFUL SEIZURE AND SUBSEQUENT USE OF ACQUIRED TAX INFORMATION CAN THEN PURSUE LEGAL REMEDY THROUGH A BIVENS SUIT OR OTHER TORT ACTION.
     HOLLINGSHEAD V. UNITED STATES 85-2 USTC 9772 (5TH CIR. 1985), RULED, 26 IRC SEC. 7421 IS A WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY BY THE GOVERNMENT FOR A CITIZEN NOW CLAIMING THAT HIS OR HER PROPERTY HAS BEEN SUBJECTED TO A WRONGFUL LEVY.
     SUPREME COURT: BLACKLEDGE V. PERRY, 417 US 21, 40 LED 2D 628, 94 SCT 2098 (1974), GUAM V. DERGURGUR, 800 F2D 1470 (9TH CIR. 1986): IT IS AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEPRIVATION OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW WHEN THE GOVERNMENT PENALIZES A CITIZEN MERELY BECAUSE HE OR SHE HAS EXERCISED ANY PROTECTED STATUTORY OR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.
     IN BOTHKE V. FLOUR ENGINEERS, 713 F, 2D 1405 (1993) THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS RULED THAT, WHEN A TAXPAYER INFORMS AN IRS AGENT THAT HE BELIEVES THAT THERE IS AN ERROR IN ASSESSMENT AND THE AGENT STILL CONTINUES LEVY ACTION, WITHOUT FIRST DETERMINING THE MERIT OF THE TAXPAYER’S ARGUMENT, SUCH AGENT LOSES HIS IMMUNITY FROM A SUIT.
     26 USC 7214 (A) UNLAWFUL ACTS OF REVENUE OFFICERS OR AGENTS.ANY OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF THE UNITED STATES WHEN ACTING IN CONNECTION WITH ANY REVENUE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES AND VIOLATES ANY SECTION OF THIS ACT AS TO CRIMINAL OR WRONG DOING, SHALL BE FINED NOT MORE THAN $10,000 OR IMPRISONED NOT MORE THAN 5 YEARS, OR BOTH UPON CONVICTION BY THE COURT.
     MERIWETHER V. COUGHLIN, 879 F2D 1037 (2ND CIR. 1989): WHEN AN OFFICIAL HAS ACTUAL OR CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRACTICES AND FAILS TO ACT IN “DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE,” THEN SUPERVISORY LIABILITY MAY BE IMPOSED UNDER TITLE 42, SEC. 1983. HE CAN BE SUED!
     MANY AMERICANS THINK THAT THEY HAVE NO LEGAL RIGHTS TO PROTECT THEMSELVES WHEN BEING WRONGED BY EITHER FEDERAL OR STATE GOVERNMENT. EVEN JUDGES HAVE BEEN SUED FOR CIVIL RIGHTS INJUSTICES IN COURT, BUT I DID NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE RULINGS OR LACK OF RULINGS IN SUCH CASES EXCEPT TO HEAR A FEW STATE JUDGES GOT SUCCESSFULLY SUED FOR CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN THEIR STATE COURTS.
     I HEARD A NONSENSE LEGAL ARGUMENT BY SOME MEMBERS OF CONGRESS I UNDERSTAND THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE FINAL RIGHTS OF LEGAL AUTHORITY OVER STATE OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. I QUOTED SOME KEY LEGAL DECISIONS SHOWING THAT THE CONCEPT OF LAW AMERICA WAS FOUNDED UPON IN 1776 IS THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE COLLECTIVELY THE “KING” (AND “QUEEN”!) IN LEGAL AUTHORITY OVER ALL GOVERNMENT IN AMERICA WHETHER FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL. LOOK UP AT MY WEBSITE MY PROPOSED OMNI LAW WHICH IS TO AUTHORIZE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT OF REFERENDUM OVER FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WHETHER TO PASS A LAW OR POLICY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DO NOT WANT TO PASS EVEN THOUGH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT THEM PASSED. AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN CANCEL LAWS AND POLICIES BY NATIONAL REFERENDUM WHEN MEMBERS OF CONGRESS PASSED LAWS AND POLICIES CONTRARY TO THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND OFTEN KNOWING FULL WELL THAT THEY ACTED CONTRARY TO THE NATIONAL WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.  MY PROPOSED OMNI LAW IS MODELED AFTER THE ANCIENT 10 CIVIL TRIBUNE LAW OF ANCIENT ROME WHICH JAMES MADISON, FATHER OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS, ENDORSED AS THE SMARTEST IDEA OF ANCIENT MAN TO PROTECT HIS LEGAL RIGHTS FROM LEGAL TYRANNY IN GOVERNMENT AND TO FORCE THE GOVERNMENT TO BE THE SERVANT OF THE PEOPLE BY NATIONAL REFERENDUM INSTEAD OF LETTING THEM TRY TO BE MASTERS OVER THE PEOPLE AND DO MANY THINGS VIOLATING THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE ROMAN PEOPLE. ROME PROSPERED UNDER REFERENDUM BASED GOVERNMENT BUT LED BY STATESMEN, NOT MOB LEADERS, SO THE LAWS PASSED WERE WISE AND PRACTICAL FOR THE ROMANS TO LIVE UNDER. WHEN INTELLIGENT PEOPLE ADDRESSED THE ROMAN PEOPLE, THE PEOPLE RECOGNIZED WHAT WAS SMART AND VOTED FOR IT BY REFERENDUM. THIS WAS GOVERNMENT BY WILL OF THE PEOPLE, BUT THE PEOPLE DEBATED THE PROS AND CONS OF PROPOSED REFERENDUMS BEFORE VOTING. AND FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS, THIS GAVE QUALITY, SMART, STATESMANLIKE GOVERNMENT TO THE PEOPLE AND THE ROMANS BECAME THE GREATEST RACE ON EARTH AND KNOWN TO BE THE MOST PRACTICAL RACE ON EARTH AT THE SAME TIME.
     FULL NAME OF THE OMNI LAW IS SHOWN ON OUR WEBSITE. WE DO ACCEPT SUPPORT FOR PASSAGE OF OUR OMNI LAW WHICH IS IN FULL NAME IS “THE OMNIBUS CIVIL RIGHTS ACT FOR AMERICA.” PURCHASE OF OUR PRODUCTS SHOWN ON OUR WEBSITE AND LOAN PAYMENTS INTO OUR OMNI LAW LOAN PROGRAM HELP FINANCE THE COMING PASSAGE OF THE OMNI LAW AS THE NEWEST CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IN AMERICA. IF YOU CAN’T ORDER THROUGH OUR WEBSITE, OUR MAILING ADDRESS FOR SUPPORT THEN IS NIFI, P.O. BOX 1465, SENECA, SC 29679 . MAKE CHECKS, ETC. OUT TO NIFI AND TELL US WHAT ANY PAYMENT IS FOR. WE MUST LOOK LIKE WE ARE SOON TO WIN IN AMERICA IN THE EYES OF THOSE IN WASH., D.C. WHO DON’T WANT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT OF REFERENDUM OVER WASH., D.C. WILD HACKING ATTACKS AND OTHER NASTY WASHINGTON TACTICS HAVE BEEN TRIED TRYING TO SLOW US DOWN FROM WINNING IN AMERICA. BUT WE MOVE ALONG AND WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED IF WE DO NOT SOON WIN IN AMERICA. WE HAVE MOMENTUM BEHIND US AND BUILDING! OUR WEBSITE IS WWW.FASTBOOMAMERICANECONOMY.COMOUR EMAIL IS [email protected]
     PASS THIS REPORT TO ALL YOU KNOW. LET’S WIN AMERICA FAST NOW! THIS SHOWS YOU LEGAL RIGHTS YOU HAVE UNDER LAW BUT WERE NEVER TAUGHT IN SCHOOL TO YOU. THEY WANT YOU TO THINK THAT YOU ARE HELPLESS AND CANNOT CHANGE THE DIRECTION OF AMERICA IF YOU WANT TO. WE ARE SHOWING YOU THAT WE CAN FULFILL THE HIGHEST IDEALISM THAT THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION OF 1776 STOOD FOR!
     YOURS FOR GOD AND COUNTRY, ERASMUS OF AMERICA (PEN NAME FOR THAT AMERICAN LEADER WHO SPENT ELEVEN CALENDAR YEARS IN MILITARY ACADEMIES AND THEN A WILD BACKGROUND IN MILITARY INTELLIGENCE CRACKING EVEN THE TOP  NUCLEAR ANNIHILATION PLANS AGAINST AMERICA FROM THE MOSCOW INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR STUDIES. STUDIED WITH SIX OF THE MOST BRILLIANT ECONOMISTS OF AMERICA AND EUROPE INCLUDING A GERMAN ECONOMIST ENDORSED BY ALBERT EINSTEIN AS TEACHING THE ONLY TRUE ECONOMIC SCIENCE IN THE 20TH CENTURY. IT IS SUPER FREE ENTERPRISE AND WILL SKYROCKET THE AMERICAN ECONOMY BY TACTICS USED BEFORE WITH SUPER SUCCESS BUT WERE CENSORED FROM YOU IN YOUR SCHOOLS SO YOU WOULD NOT KNOW THAT WE CAN SKYROCKET THE ECONOMY OF AMERICA WHENEVER WE DECIDE TO. WE WILL SKYROCKET PAST CHINA IN SUPER GROWTH THROUGH SUPER FREE ENTERPRISE ONCE WE PASS THE OMNI LAW. WE DON’T NEED COMMUNISM IN AMERICA AS SOME IN WASH., D.C. STAND FOR. FREE ENTERPRISE IS THE RIGHT ANSWER FOR AMERICA AND BASED UPON THE GOD-GIVEN RIGHTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE UNDER LAW AS FOUNDED IN 1776, BUT FORGOTTEN BY TOO MANY IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION TODAY IN AMERICA! I HAVE BRILLIANT FRIENDS WHO WILL HELP MOVE AMERICA ONCE THE OMNI LAW IS PASSED. MY MOTHER HAD ONCE BEEN RATED BY I.Q. TEST TO BE THE MOST BRILLIANT CHILD IN AMERICAN HISTORY UP TO THEN AND ENTERED A STATE UNIVERSITY WITHOUT PRIOR FORMAL EDUCATION AFTER SELF-EDUCATING HERSELF. SHE WAS A CHILD ACTRESS AND HAD NO TIME FOR FORMAL SCHOOLING, SO SELF-EDUCATED HERSELF AFTER LEARNING HOW TO READ AND WRITE FROM HER GRANDMOTHER. I.Q. IS NICE BUT A CANADIAN BUSINESS FRIEND OF MINE ONCE DEFINED WELL WHAT REAL EDUCATION IS. “EDUCATION IS APPLICATION!” THAT GOES FOR THE NON-EDUCATED THOMAS EDISON AND THE SUPER EDUCATED ALBERT EINSTEIN. I AM A TEAM PLAYER. I HAVE BRILLIANT FRIENDS AND WE FORM A POTENT FORCE TO HELP AMERICA WITH ONCE THE OMNI LAW IS PASSED.
     HOWEVER, I BELIEVE LIKE RONALD REAGAN DID IN THE ENORMOUS TALENT HIDDEN IN THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. ONCE THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT STOP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, THE WHOLE NATION CAN AWAKEN TO HOW BRILLIANT IT IS CAPABLE OF BEING AND WE COLLECTIVELY WILL RESTORE AMERICA TO THE GREATNESS IT IS CAPABLE OF. I BELIEVE IN YOU IS WHY I WROTE THE OMNI LAW FOR YOU. AND WHILE I HAVE SOME ANSWERS THAT CAN SOLVE SOME KEY PROBLEMS OF AMERICA, IT IS THE COLLECTIVE GENIUS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT WILL BE UNLOCKED BY PASSAGE OF THE OMNI LAW. USE THIS LEGAL RIGHTS REPORT SO NO WRONG ELEMENTS IN AMERICA WALK OVER YOUR GOD-GIVEN RIGHTS IN AMERICA. GOD BLESS AMERICA! GOD BLESS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! AND LET’S MAKE GOD PROUD OF AMERICA AGAIN! WE WERE BORN FOR GREATNESS AS A PEOPLE AS GOD INTENDED FOR OUR NATION AND RACE!)

NESARA- Restore America – Galactic News



Source: http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2015/09/your-updated-legal-rights-protected-by.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.