Online:
Visits:
Stories:

By Voice of Reason
Contributor profile | More stories

Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

CISA is a Surveillance Bill to Spy on You, Not a Security Bill

Friday, October 30, 2015 3:50

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

While many of us have speculated, no one really knows what Obama’s true end game is, but universally I think we can all agree it won’t be in the best interest of We the People! What’s sad, is this past week it became obvious the American people are weary and tired of fighting. By far, Obama is proving to have much more stamina that the American people when it comes to fighting for what he believes. That much is evident when you look at the sheer number of Obama horrors that haven’t even gotten honorable mention this week, much less had people fight. People have given up fighting. This week the Senate passed the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA) in the Senate by a vote of 74-21. Previously, over the last 2+ years, that bill has been known as Cyber Intelligence Sharing & Protection Act (CISPA), and each time it’s come to a vote, We the People lit up the switchboards in DC and managed to stop it. This week, it was so quiet you could hear a pin drop. Anyone who’s been following long enough may remember the following two posts as far back as 2013:

Oct. 2013: CISPA IS BACK! It Has Already Passed The House. It CANNOT Pass The Senate!

Dec. 2013: CISPA: The Most Unconstitutional Law in American History – The Bill That WON’T Die!

The lie we were told (to anyone even listening) was that this bill is supposed to protect the American people, and more importantly Big Business from hackers. And that’s all you need to know America, go back to sleep.What they didn’t tell you, was the NSA and big business slipped a Trojan horse past the American people ONCE AGAIN to allow the government to spy on YOU. Yes…YOU! CISA creates a program at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) through which corporations will share user data in bulk with several US government agencies. In exchange for participating, the companies will receive complete immunity from Freedom of Information Act requests and regulatory action relating to the data they share. DHS will then share the information throughout the government. Sounds great right? Not one damn thing will be private anymore.

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

CHECK OUT THE NEW GOOGLE+ PAGE!

As you’ll learn in the first video, the data in question would come from private industry, which mines everything from credit card statements to prescription drug purchase records to target advertising and tweak product lines. Indeed, much of it is detailed financial and health information the government has never had access to in any form. The bill’s proponents said the data would be “anonymized”. “The Freedom of Information Act is neutralized, while a cornucopia of federal agencies get access to the public’s heretofore private-held information with little fear that such sharing would ever be known to those whose information was shared.”

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

Even the Department of Homeland Security agrees that the latest CISA bill could sweep away many important privacy protections. Breitbart reports “Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat who allied with Sen. Rand Paul to water down provisions of the Patriot Act this summer, said the bill “virtually guarantees” that private information unrelated to cybersecurity will be shared with the government, and said that the bill was a “direct pipeline to the NSA.”

In the second video, you’ll learn that the Senate rejected all of the privacy amendments that would protect the average citizens right to privacy. But how exactly did they do that. TechDirt breaks down the geek speak detailing the NSA’s Unconstitutional desperation to collect data related to innocent law-abiding Americans “…the NSA and FBI (and CIA, for that matter), frequently make use of backdoor searches of the upstream data — a capability that was approved in 2011. Basically, the rules changed so that the intelligence community could sniff through data that was deemed collected “incidentally.” And that includes basically anything that is picked up in the “upstream” collection of data (tapping internet backbone lines) under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act…. CISA is likely to be the key piece for letting the NSA and FBI warrantless spy on Americans’ after the FISA Court limited that ability a few years ago. “

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

CHECK OUT THE NEW GOOGLE+ PAGE!

The country was far from perfect before Obama came into office with all the filth he brought him, but at least you never heard stories about a DOJ Task Force Created To Target Americans With “Anti-Government Views,” or you never heard that If You Speak Out Against Obama’s the Department of Injustice, YOU May Be Locked Up As a Terrorist, there were never stories about the IRS Using Military Equipment to Spy On Conservative Americans’ Phone Calls, and you DEFINITELY never heard stories about The President Sending a Team of Lawyers to Help a Pair of Muslims Sue an American Business to Enforce Sharia Law. Before Obama, you never heard those stories because they didn’t happen. Now, people don’t hear them because they CHOOSE not to. I’ve been SCREAMING forever about the danger coming from bills that are already passed and have signed into law. I;m referring to legislation that is in the process of being implemented like the bills below. These days, people are just NOT hearing it.

What Makes The Trans-Pacific Partnership So Bad? You Better Sit Down

The TPP Has a Secret Clause to Limit Free Speech Online â€“ Shocked?

Net Neutrality: What it REALLY Means, and How it Could REALLY Impact You

PEOPLE ARE GOING TO ABSOLUTELY FREAK OUT WHEN ALL THIS IS FINALLY UP AND RUNNING… FREAK OUT I TELL YOU!

On CISA, Tech Dirt Reports:

I’ve had a few conversations recently with people on Twitter who claim that CISA is “not a surveillance bill,” claiming that they’ve read the bill and there’s nothing about surveillance in it. It’s true that the bill positions itself as nothing more than a “cybersecurity” bill that clarifies a few things and then provides some immunity for companies who “voluntarily” share information. However, as I’ve said in response, in order to understand why it’s a surveillance bill, you have to look more closely at how CISA interacts with other laws and what the intelligence community is currently doing. Unfortunately, this isn’t always easy, because part of what the intelligence community is doing and how they’ve interpreted other laws remains secret. But, as you’ve probably heard, some of that has been leaking out over the past few years.

Back in June, we wrote about Jonathan Mayer’s analysis of another leak story done by Pro Publica and the NY Times, showing that the FBI and the NSA blurred the lines between “terrorism” and “cybercrime” in order to do more warrantless surveillance of people they deemed to be “hackers.” As Mayer noted at the time, this revealed that beyond the kinds of selectors most people believed the FBI and NSA were allowed to search the “upstream” corpus of data on, it could also use “cybersignatures.” And thus, it seemed clear that CISA was about expanding the ability of the FBI and the NSA to get access to more such signatures, in order to more widely do warrantless surveillance on Americans’ communications.

You have to dig a bit deeper into the muck to understand why this is true, and it has to do with another recently revealed tidbit, which is that the NSA and FBI (and CIA, for that matter), frequently make use of backdoor searches of the upstream data — a capability that was approved in 2011. Basically, the rules changed so that the intelligence community could sniff through data that was deemed collected “incidentally.” And that includes basically anything that is picked up in the “upstream” collection of data (tapping internet backbone lines) under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act.

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

Now, Marcy Wheeler has taken this a step further, noting that it looks like Mayer’s analysis may actually have underplayed things. Wheeler’s post is long and detailed, and delves deeply into more partially secret things, and tries to read the tea leaves from some previously declassified and leaked documents and programs, but comes to the conclusion that CISA is likely to be the key piece for letting the NSA and FBI warrantless spy on Americans’ after the FISA Court limited that ability a few years ago.

Without going into all the details of Wheeler’s post, the short version is that it’s well established that the NSA used to have a program very similar to the phone dragnet program, but for internet communications. Eventually that was determined to go too far and was shut down. But Wheeler is suggesting that a more narrow version was likely re-authorized later, and CISA is the way to expand it. It appears that the intelligence community was allowed to collect online info, but only to protect its own network. But, with the immunity granted under CISA, the NSA and FBI could effectively hand that power over to AT&T and Verizon, and freely “share” information back and forth with no liability for the telcos (both of which have a long history of proactively helping the NSA).

That is, CISA affirmatively permits private companies to scan, identify, and possess cybersecurity threat information transiting or stored on their systems. It permits private companies to conduct precisely the same kinds of scans the government currently obligates telecoms to do under upstream 702, including data both transiting their systems (which for the telecoms would be transiting their backbone) or stored in its systems (so cloud storage).

Thus, CISA permits the telecoms to do the kinds of scans they currently do for foreign intelligence purposes for cybersecurity purposes in ways that (unlike the upstream 702 usage we know about) would not be required to have a foreign nexus. CISA permits the people currently scanning the backbone to continue to do so, only without consideration of whether the signature has a foreign tie or not. Unlike FISA, CISA permits the government to collect entirely domestic data.

Of course, there’s no requirement that the telecoms scan for every signature the government shares with it and share the results with the government. Though both Verizon and AT&T have a significant chunk of federal business — which just got put out for rebid on a contract that will amount to $50 billion — and they surely would be asked to scan the networks supporting federal traffic for those signatures. But they can do so if they want to. And the telecoms are outspoken supporters of CISA, so we should presume they plan to share promiscuously under this bill.

As Wheeler notes, if this is true, then it actually makes CISA a super powerful surveillance tool for the government for a variety of reasons. First, it’s all “voluntary” between the telcos and the NSA/FBI, so no FISA Court to get in the way. Next, she points out that, while the language of the bill says that Homeland Security will “scrub” private info before sharing it with other agencies, it actually notes that the FBI can “veto” that scrub. And working together, the NSA and FBI can do a lot of damage this way:

CISA, as written, would let FBI and NSA veto any scrub (including of content) at DHS. And incoming data (again, probably including content) would be shared immediately not only with FBI (which has been the vehicle for sharing NSA data broadly) but also Treasury and ODNI, which are both veritable black holes from a due process perspective. And what few protections for US persons are tied to a relevance standard that would be accomplished by virtue of a tie to that selector. Thus, CISA would permit the immediate sharing, with virtually no minimization, of US person content across the government (and from there to private sector and local governments).

As she notes, this makes CISA — as Senator Ron Wyden has been saying for months — not a cybersecurity bill at all, but a vast domestic internet surveillance bill.