Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
CNN host Anderson Cooper asked Hillary Clinton at the 2016 presidential election’s first Democratic debate, “Will you say anything to get elected?” (Evan Vucci / AP)
When politicians renege on campaign promises, they are not “being economical with the truth”, but “deceiving the public in order to win an election”—and such betrayal should trigger a general election, writes Guardian features contributor Simon Hattenstone.
In his 1988 election campaign, George H.W. Bush famously said: “Read my lips: no new taxes”. Then he “brazenly introducing new taxes”, as Hattenstone reminds us.
And disastrously, George W. Bush said in 2000, “If we don’t stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we’re going to have a serious problem coming down the road. And I’m going to prevent that.” We all know what happened next.
Hattenstone, focusing on government in the U.K., protests:
Ah, that’s politics, we blithely say. But it shouldn’t be politics. And it needn’t be politics. Politicians should not be able to cheat their way to power. The simplest solution would be to introduce a right of veto: opposition parties should be able to reject a proposal that contradicts the government’s election pledges.
If a political party then insists on going ahead with a policy at odds with pre-election promises, they should have a right to, but they should also know there is a price to be paid. There is currently much discussion about the prospect of MPs who regularly defy their party whip facing reselection. But what about parties who defy themselves – and the public who voted them in? Surely, if a government insists on breaking promises that got them elected in the first place, it should face the ultimate sanction: the automatic triggering of a general election.
Yes, prime minister, of course you can say one thing and do the other, but if you do, the public gets the chance to say whether it still considers you fit for office. This might be an expensive and time-consuming solution to political mendacity, but imagine how much more transparent politics would be if the liars’ charter were introduced to parliament.
Read more here.
—Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
Related Entries