The Plain and Utter Truth about Nibiru, the Anunnaki, Armageddon, the End of Days, Prophecies etc. This Is the Last Time This Will Be Revealed!

(Before It's News)

Will they revisit? When will they come back? These questions have been inquired of me numerous occasions, “they” simply being the Anunnaki gods whose tale has filled volumes.

The response to the first question is you bet; there are indications that require to be listened to, and the prophecies of the Return have to be satisfied.

The response to the second question has preoccupied Mankind ever since the watershed incidents in Jerusalem more than 2 thousand years earlier.

But the question is not only “if” and “when.” What will the Return indicate, what will it deliver with it?

Will it be a good-hearted coming, or-as when the Deluge was looming- bring about the End?

Which prophecies would come true: a Messianic Time, the Second Coming, a new Beginning – or possibly a devastating Apocalypse, the Ultimate End, Armageddon . . .

It is the very last likelihood that shifts these prophecies from the world of theology, escatology, or simply curiosity to a issue of Mankind’s very survival; for Armageddon, a phrase that has come to signify a war of unimagined calamitous extent, is actually the title of a precise location in a land that has been open to perils of nuclear annihilation.

In the twenty-first century b.c.e., a war of the Kings of the East against the Kings of the West was accompanied by a nuclear calamity.

Twenty-one centuries in the future, when b.c.e. adjusted to a.d., Mankind’s fears were depicted in a scroll, concealed in a cave near the Dead Sea, that detailed a terrific and remaining

“War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness.”

Today just as before, in the twenty-first century a.d., a nuclear menace hangs over the very same historical location.

It is sufficient reason to request: Will history duplicate itself-does history duplicate itself, in some mysterious means, every twenty-one centuries?

A war, an annihilating conflagration, is actually represented as component of the End of Days case in Ezekiel (chapters 38-39).

Though “Gog of the land of Magog,” or “Gog and Magog,” are foreseen as the primary instigators in that final war, the collection of combatants that shall be sucked into the battles encompasses practically every nation of note; and the target of the conflagration shall be “the dwellers of the Navel of the Earth”-the folks of Jerusalem in accordance with the Bible, but the folks of “Babylon” as a replacement for Nippur to those for whom the clock stopped there.

It is a spine-chilling conclusion that Ezekiel’s record of those widespread nations (38: 5) that will participate in the final war-Armageddon- in fact commences with PERSIA- the very country (modern day Iran) whose leaders try to get nuclear weapons with which to “wipe off the face of the Earth” the folks who live where Har-Megiddo is!

Just who is that “Gog of the land of Magog,” and why does that prophecy from two and a half millennia ago appear so much like current headlines?

Does the precision of such specifics in the Prophecy specify the When – to your time, to your century?

Armageddon, a Final War of Gog and Magog, is additionally an crucial element of the End of Days predicament of the New Testament’s prophetic book,

Revelation (whose full title is The Apocalypse of St. John the Divine).

It examines the instigators of the apocryphal occurrences to 2 beasts, one of which can “make fire come down from heaven to earth, in sight of men.” Only an enigmatic hint is provided for its identification (13: 18):

Here is wisdom:
Let him that hath understanding
count the number of the beast:
It is the number of a man; and his number is
six hundred and threescore and six.

Countless have tried to make sense of the mysterious number 666, supposing it is a coded concept relating to the End of Days.

Because the book was composed when the persecution of Christians in Rome commenced, the recognized meaning is that the number was a code for the oppressor emperor Nero, the numerical value of whose name in Hebrew (NeRON QeSaR) added up to 666.

The reality that he had been to the space base in Baalbek, maybe to inaugurate the temple to Jupiter there, in the year a.d. 60 could -or could not – have a bearing on the 666 dilemna.

That there may very well be more to 666 than a link to Nero is proposed by the fascinating truth that 600, 60, and 6 are all basic numbers of the Sumerian sexagesimal system, so that the “code” might call back to some previous texts; there were 600 Anunnaki, Anu’s numerical rank was 60, Ishkur/Adad’s rank was 6. Subsequently, if the three numbers are to be multiplied rather than added, we get 666 = 600 × 60 × 6 = 216,000, which is the familiar 2160 (a zodiacal age) times 100-a outcome that can be speculated on forever.

Then there is the challenge that when seven angels expose the series of future incidents, they do not link them to Rome; they link them to “Babylon.” The traditional justification has been that, like the 666 was a code for the Roman ruler, so was “Babylon” a code word for Rome.

But Babylon was actually eliminated for centuries when Revelation was created, and Revelation, speaking of Babylon, unmistakably links the prophecies to “the great river Euphrates” (9: 14), even conveying how “the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates,” drying it up so that the Kings of the East would be linked in the fighting (16: 12). The talk is of a city/land on the Euphrates, not on the Tiber River.

Considering that Revelation’s prophecies are of the future, one must deduce that “Babylon” is not a code-Babylon implies Babylon, a future Babylon that will get engaged in the war of “Armageddon”

(which verse 16: 16 properly describes as the title of “a place in the Hebrew tongue”-Har-Megiddo, Mount Megiddo, in Israel)-a war affecting the Holy Land.

the identify of “a place in the Hebrew tongue”-Har-Megiddo, Mount Megiddo, in Israel)-a war affecting the Holy Land. If that future Babylon is without a doubt today’s Iraq, the prophetic passages are again chilling, for as they predict current events resulting in the fall of Babylon after a short but magnificent war, they foresee the breakup of Babylon/Iraq into 3 parts! (16:19).

Such as the Book of Daniel, which foretold periods of tribulations and trying periods in the messianic method, so has Revelation attempted to clarify the enigmatic Old Testament prophecies by conveying (Chapter 20) a First Messianic Age with “a First Resurrection” lasting a thousand years, accompanied by a Satanic rule of a thousand years (when “Gog and Magog” will partake in an tremendous war), and then a 2nd messianic time and an additional resurrection (and hence the “Second Coming”).

Unavoidably, these prophecies brought on a craze of conjecture as the year a.d. 2000 neared: rumors regarding the Millennium as a point in time, in the history of Mankind and the Earth, when prophecies would come true.

Trapped with millennium questions as the year 2000 neared, folks were told that nothing will occur in 2000, and not only because the true millennium point counting from the birth of Jesus had already went by, Jesus having been delivered, by all scholarly calculations, in 6 or 7 b.c.e.

The primary purpose for my viewpoint was that the prophecies seemed to visualize not a linear timeline-year 1, year 2, year 9 hundred, and so on-but a cyclical repeating of incidents, the fundamental perception that “The First Things shall be the Last Things”-something that can occur only when history and historical time proceed in a circle, where the start point is the end point, and the other way round.

Built in this cyclical approach of history is the idea of God as an everlasting divine being who had been present at the Beginning when Heaven and Earth were made and who will be there at the End of Days, when His kingdom shall be restored upon His holy mount. It is depicted in recurring statements from the earliest biblical statements through the

latest Prophets, as when God declared, through Isaiah (41: 4, 44: 6, 48: 12): I am He, I am the First and also the Last I am . . . From the Beginnings the Ending I foretell, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done.

Isaiah 48: 12, 46: 10 And equally so (twice) in the New Testament’s Book of Revelation:

I am Alpha and Omega, the Beginning and the Ending, sayeth the Lord – Which is, and which was, and which will be. Revelation 1: 8

Without a doubt, the foundation for prophecy was the perception that the End was attached in the Beginning, that the Future could be foretold because the Past was recognized – if not to Man, then to God: I am the one “who from the Beginning tells the End,” Yahweh stated (Isaiah 46: 10). The Prophet Zechariah (1: 4, 7: 7, 7: 12) predicted God’s plans for the future-the Last Days- with regards to the Past, the First Days.

This perception, which is restated in the Psalms, in Proverbs, and in the Book of Job, was considered as a universal divine strategy for the whole Earth and all its nations.

The Prophet= Isaiah, conceptualizing the Earth’s nations gathered to find out what is in store, detailed them inquiring each other: “Who among us can tell the future by letting us hear the First Things?” (41: 22).

That this was a universal tenet is demonstrated in a collection of Assyrian Prophecies, when the god Nabu informed the Assyrian king Esarhaddon: “The future shall be like the past.”

This cyclical element of the biblical Prophecies of the Return leads us to one present answer to the question of WHEN.

A cyclical spinning of historical time was discovered, the reader will remember, in Mesoamerica, caused from the meshing, like the gears of wheels, of a pair of calendars, making the “bundle” of 52 years, on the occurring of which-after an unspecified number of turns-Quetzalcoatl (alias Thoth/Ningishzidda) guaranteed to come back.

And that presents us to the so-called Mayan Prophecies, based on which the End of Days was supposed to come about in a.d. 2012.

The prospect that the prophesied crucial date has effortlessly drawn much attention, and deserves explaining and examining.

The proclaimed date develops from the fact that in that year (depending how one figures) the time unit called Baktun finished its thirteenth turn. Since a Baktun lasts 144,000 days, it is some kind of a landmark.

Some mistakes, or fallacious presumptions, in this situation require to be mentioned.

The first is that the Baktun belongs not to the two “meshing” calendars with the 52-year guarantee (the Haab and the Tzolkin), but to a third and much more aged calendar called The Long Count.

It was presented by the Olmecs-Africans who had arrived at Mesoamerica when Thoth was deported from Egypt-and the count of days really began with that occurrence, so that Day One of the Long Count was in what most people date as August 3113 b.c.e. Glyphs in that calendar symbolized the following series of units:

1 kin = 1 day
1 Uinal = 1 kin × 20 = 20 days
1 Tun = 1 kin × 360 = 360 days
1 Ka-tun = 1 tun × 20 = 7,200 days
1 Bak-tun = 1 Ka-tun × 20 = 144,000 days
1 Pictun = 1 Bak-tun × 20 = 2,880,000 days

These units, each a multiple of the earlier one, thus carried on past the Baktun with ever-increasing glyphs. But since Mayan monuments never ever achieved beyond 12 Baktuns, whose 1,728,000 days were already past the Mayan lifetime, the 13th Baktun seems as a real landmark. Besides, Mayan lore allegedly held that the current “Sun” or Age  would conclude with the 13th Baktun, so when its number of days (144,000 × 13 = 1,872,000) is divided by 365.25, it results in the passing of 5,125 years; when the b.c.e. 3113 is subtracted, the outcome is the year a.d. 2012.

This is an interesting as well as an portentous prediction. But that date has been questioned, already a century ago, by scholars (like Fritz Buck, El Calendario Maya en la Cultura de Tiahuanacu) who suggested that as the above list indicates, the mutiplier, and thus the divider, should be the calendar’s own mathematically perfect 360 and not 365.25. That way, the 1,872,000 days result in 5,200 years-a perfect consequence, because it signifies precisely 100 “bundles” of Thoth’s magical number 52. Therefore measured, Thoth’s magical year of the Return would be a.d. 2087 (5200 − 3113 = 2087).

You could stand even that wait; the only obstacle is that the Long Count is a linear time count, and not the needed cyclical one, so that its counted days could roll on to the fourteenth Baktun and the fifteenth Baktun and on and on.

All those things, nevertheless, does not get rid of the importance of a prophetic millennium.

Since the origin of “millennium” as an escatological time had its roots in Jewish apocryphal manuscripts from the 2nd century b.c.e., the hunt for meaning must shift in that direction. Actually, the reference to “a thousand”-a millennium-as defining an era had its origins way back in the Old Testament.
Deuteronomy (7: 9) allocated to the duration of God’s covenant with Israel a interval of “a thousand generations”-an affirmation duplicated (I Chronicles 16:15) when the Ark of the Covenant was brought to Jerusalem by David. The Psalms consistently utilized the number “thousand” to Yahweh, his wonders, and even to his chariot (Psalm 68: 17).

Specifically appropriate to the issue of the End of Days and the Return is the assertion in Psalm 90: 4 – a assertion credited to Moses himself-that said of God that “a thousand years, in thy eyes, are but as one day that has passed.”

This assertion has given rise to conjecture (which began quickly after the Roman destruction of the Temple) that it was a way  to discover the challenging messianic End of Days: if Creation, “The Beginning,” as outlined by Genesis, required God 6 days, and a divine day persists a thousand years, the effect is a duration of 6,000 years from Beginning to End.

The End of Days, it has therefore been determined, will come in the Anno Mundi year 6,000.

Utilized on the Hebrew calendar of Nippur that commenced in 3760 b.c.e., this implies that the End of Days will take place in a.d. 2240 (6000 − 3760 = 2240).

This third End of Days solution may be frustrating or comforting – it relies on one’s expectations.

The elegance of this solution is that it is in perfect balance with the Sumerian sexagesimal (“base 60”) system. It might even demonstrate in the future to be correct, but I do not believe so: it is once again linear-and it is a cyclical time unit that is required by the prophecies.

With barely any of the “modern” forecasted dates feasible, one should look back at the olden “formulas”-do what had been suggested in Isaiah, “look at the signs backwards.” We have 2 cyclical choices: the Divine Time orbital phase of Nibiru, and the Celestial Time of the zodiacal Precession. Which one is it?

That the Anunnaki came and went while in a “window of opportunity” when Nibiru came at Perigee (closest the Sun, and therefore the closest to Earth and Mars) is so totally obvious that some followers of mine used to basically take 3600 from 4000 (as a rounded time frame for Anu’s last visit), resulting in 400 b.c.e., or take 3,600 from 3760 (when the Nippur calendar started)- as the Maccabbees did-and turn up at 160 b.c.e.

No matter what, the next appearance of Nibiru is way in the far off future.

The truth is, as the audience now understands, Nibiru came earlier, circa 560 b.c.e. When thinking about that “digression,” one must take into account that the perfect SAR (3600) has for ages been a mathematical orbital period, because celestial orbits-of planets, comets, asteroids-digress from orbit to orbit as a result of the gravitational tug of other planets near which they pass.

To employ the well-tracked Halley’s Comet as an illustration, its given period of 75 years in fact fluctuates from  74 to 76; when it last showed up in 1986, it was 76 years.

Expand Halley’s digression to Nibiru’s 3600, and you get a plus/ minus alternative of about 50 years each way.

There is one other explanation for asking yourself why Nibiru had digressed so much from its wonted SAR: the strange event of the Deluge circa 10900 b.c.e.

During its 120 SARs prior to the Deluge, Nibiru orbited while not creating such a catastrophe.

Then something strange occurred that brought Nibiru nearer to Earth: mixed with the slippage conditions of the ice sheet masking Antarctica, the Deluge happened.

What was that “something unusual”?

The solution may well lie a greater distance out in our solar system, where Uranus and Neptune orbit-planets whose numerous moons consist of some that, inexplicably, orbit in an “opposite” (“retrograde”) direction-the way Nibiru orbits.

One of the fantastic mysteries in our solar system is the fact that the planet Uranus actually lies on its side-its northsouth axis confronts the Sun horizontally rather of being vertical to it. “Something” gave Uranus a “significant hit” sometime in its past, NASA’s scientists stated-without exploring to guess what the “something” was.

I have frequently pondered whether that “something” was also what triggered the massive mysterious “chevron” scar and an mysterious “ploughed” characteristic that NASA’s Voyager 2 found on Uranus’s moon Miranda in 1986 -a moon that is unique in numerous ways from  the other moons of Uranus.

Could a celestial impact with a passing Nibiru and its moons trigger all that?

In recent years astronomers have determined that the outer large planets have not remained put where they were formed, but have been moving outward, away from the Sun.
The research determined that the shift has been most obvious in the case of Uranus and Neptune, and that can clarify why nothing occurred out there for many Nibiru orbits-then abruptly something did.

It is not implausible to believe that on its “Deluge” orbit Nibiru stumbled upon the drifting Uranus, and one of Nibiru’s moons hit Uranus, tilting it on its side; it could even be that the strike “weapon” was the enigmatic moon Miranda – a moon of Nibiru – striking Uranus and winding up taken to orbit Uranus.

Such an event would have impacted the orbit of Nibiru, slowing it down to about 3450 Earth-years instead of 3600, and ending in a post-Diluvial reappearance timetable of circa 7450, circa 4000, and circa 550 b.c.e.

If that is what had took place, it would clarify the “early” appearance of Nibiru in 556 b.c.e.-and indicate that its next arrival will be circa a.d. 2900.

For those who connect the prophesied cataclysmic incidents with the return of Nibiru- “Planet X” to some – the time is not in front of you.

But any belief that the Anunnaki restricted their comings and goings to a single limited “window” at the planet’s perigee is, nevertheless, wrong.

They could continue to keep coming and going at various other times as well.

The ancient texts document numerous occasions of back and-forth travel by the gods with no clue of a link to the planet’s distance.

There are also a number of memories of Earth-Nibiru travel by Earthlings that leave out any affirmation of Nibiru observed in the skies (a vision pressured, in contrast, when Anu frequented Earth circa 4000 b.c.e.).

In one occasion Adapa, a son of Enki by an Earthling woman, who was given Wisdom but not immortality, paid a very brief visit to Nibiru, escorted by the gods Dumuzi and Ningishzidda.

Enoch, emulating the Sumerian Enmeduranki, also came and went, two times, in his lifetime on Earth.

This was achievable in at least 2 ways, one by a spaceship quickly moving on Nibiru’s incoming stage, to arrive well ahead of perigee time; the other by decelerating a spacecraft in the course of Nibiru’s outbound stage, “falling back” toward the Sun (and therefore to Earth and Mars).

A short visit to Earth, like the one by Anu, could occur; a short visit to Nibiru (as by Adapa) could occur by reversing the procedure – by leaving Earth to head off at the pass Nibiru and departing from Nibiru for the return to earth, and so on.

A Return of the Anunnaki at a time other than the planet’s return can hence occur, and for that we are stuck with the other cyclical time-zodiacal time.

It continues to be called, in When Time Began, Celestial Time, specific from yet serving as a link between Earthly Time (our planet’s orbital cycle) and Divine Time (the clock of the Anunnaki’s planet).

If the predicted Return will be of the Anunnaki as opposed to their planet, then it befit you to look for the answer to the enigmas of gods and men through the timepiece that has associated them – the cyclical zodiac of Celestial Time.

It was designed, after all, by the Anunnaki as a method to balance out the 2 cycles; their ratio-3600 for Nibiru, 2l60 for a zodiacal Age-was the Golden Ratio of 10:6.

It lead, I have indicated, in the sexagesimal system on which Sumerian mathematics and astronomy were dependent (6× 10 × 6 × 10 and so forth).

Berossus, as it has been pointed out, considered the zodiacal Ages to be turning points in the matters of gods and men and presented that the world periodically undergoes apocalyptic catastrophes, possibly by water or by fire, whose timing is identified by heavenly phenomena.

Like his counterpart Manetho in Egypt, he also separated prehistory and history into divine, semidivine, and postdivine phases, with a grand total of 2,160,000 years of “the duration of this world.”

This – surprise of miracles! – is precisely one thousand – a millennium! – zodiacal ages.

Scholars researching ancient clay tablets addressing mathematics and astronomy were shocked to discover that the tablets utilized the brilliant number l2960000 – yes, 12,960,000-as a beginning position.

They came to the conclusion that this could only be related to the zodiacal ages of 2,160, whose multiples result in 12,960 (if 2,160 × 6), or 129,600 (if 2,160 × 60), or 1,296,000 (if multiplied by 600); and – surprise of miracles! – the brilliant number with which these ancient lists initiate, 12,960,000, is a multiple of 2,160 by 6,000-as in the divine 6 days of creation.

That significant incidents, when the issues of the gods influenced the issues of men, were linked to zodiacal ages has been demonstrated all the way through the volumes of The Earth Chronicles.

As each Age started, something significant happened: the Age of Taurus signaled the grant of civilization to Mankind.

The Age of Aries was brought in by the nuclear turmoil and ended with the Departure.

The Age of Pisces showed up with the devastation of the Temple and the starting point of Christianity.

Should one not question whether or not the prophetic End of Days truly indicates End of (zodiacal) Age?

Were the “time, times, and a half ” of Daniel basically a language mentioning to zodiacal ages?

The chance was considered, some 3 centuries ago, by none other than Sir Isaac Newton.

Best recognized for his formulation of the natural laws governing celestial motions – such as planets orbiting the Sun – his passions also lay in religious idea, and he composed lengthy treatises about the Bible and biblical prophecies.

He considered the celestial motions that he formulated to be “the mechanics of God,” and he strongly believed that the scientific discoveries that began with Galileo and Copernicus and were continued by him were meant to happen when they did.

This led him to pay particular attention to the “mathematics of Daniel.”

In March 2003 the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) startled the scientific and religious establishments with a program on Newton that revealed the existence of a document, handwritten by him on front and back, that calculated the End of Days according to Daniel’s prophecies.

• Between 2132 and 2370 as per one clue given
to Daniel,
• Between 2090 and 2374 as per a
second clue,
• Between 2060 and 2370 for the crucial “time, times & half time.”

“Sir Isaac Newton foretold the world would terminate in the year 2060,” the BBC reported. Not exactly, maybe – but as the table of zodiacal ages in an earlier chapter demonstrates, he was not far off the mark in 2 of his “not earlier than” dates: 2060 and 2090.

The authentic valued document of the great Englishman is now stored in the Department of Manuscripts and Archives of the Jewish National and University Library-in Jerusalem!

A coincidence?

————————————————————————————————————————————————————

It was in a book, Genesis Revisited that the “Phobos Incident”-a hushed-up occurrence -was first publicly unveiled.

It involved the loss, in 1989, of a Soviet spacecraft routed to explore Mars and its potentially hollow moonlet called Phobos.

Actually, not 1 but 2 Soviet spacecraft were sacrificed. Named Phobos 1 and Phobos 2 to point out their objective -to probe Mars’ moonlet Phobos – they were launched in 1988, to reach Mars in 1989.

Though a Soviet project, it was backed by NASA and European agencies. Phobos 1 just disappeared – no particulars or justification were ever publicly given.

Phobos 2 did make it to Mars, and began to send back photographs taken by 2 cameras – a normal one and an infrared one.

Incredibly or alarmingly, they provided photographs of the shadow of a cigar-shaped subject flying in the planet’s skies between the Soviet craft and the surface area of Mars.

The Soviet mission chiefs detailed the object that forged the shadow as “something which some may call a flying saucer.”

Promptly, the spacecraft was directed to shift from Mars orbit to approach the moonlet and, from a distance of 50 yards, overwhelmed it with laser beams.

The final picture Phobos 2 provided exhibited a missile coming at it from the moonlet. Right away after that, the spacecraft went into a whirl and stopped transmitting- demolished by the mysterious missile.

The “Phobos incident” continues to be, officially, an “unexplained accident.” The truth is, right afterwards, a secret commission on which all the leading space nations were manifested sprang into motion.

The commission and the file it developed merit more examination than they obtained, for they hold the key to understanding what the world’s leading nations truly understand about Nibiru and the Anunnaki.

The geopolitical occurrences that lead in the secret group’s development started with the discovery, in 1983, of a “Neptune sized planet” by IRAS – NASA’s Infra-Red Astronomical Satellite – which searched the edges of the solar system not visually but by discovering heat-emitting celestial bodies.

The hunt for a tenth planet was one of its stated goals, and indeed it found one-determining that it was a planet because, found once and then again 6 months afterwards, it was undoubtedly moving in our direction.

The news of the finding  made headlines but was rolled away the next day as a “misunderstanding.” The truth is, the knowledge was so shocking that it directed to a unexpected transformation in U.S. – Soviet relations, a meeting and an understanding for space cooperation between President Reagan and Chairman Gorbachev, and public statements by the President at the United Nations and other message boards that provided the following words (pointing heavenwards with his finger as he stated them)

Just think how easy his task and mine might be in these meetings that we held if suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species from another planet outside in the universe . . . I occasionally think how quickly our differences would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world.

The Working Committee that was created as a final result of these issues carried out several meetings and leisurely consultation – until the March 1989 Phobos event.

Working feverishly, it developed in April 1989 a set of instructions known as the Declaration of Principles Concerning Activities Following the Detection of Extraterrestrial Intelligence, by which the methods to be implemented after acquiring “a signal or other evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence” were decided upon.

The “signal,” the group unveiled, “might not be simply one that indicates its intelligent origin but could be an actual message that may need decoding.” The decided methods involved undertakings to hold off disclosure of the contact for at least twenty-four hours before a reply is made.

This was certainly absurd if the message had come from a planet light years away . . . No, the arrangements were for a close by encounter!

To me, all these incidents since 1983, plus all the proof from Mars quickly detailed in earlier volumes, and the missile shot out from the moonlet Phobos, suggest that the Anunnaki still have a presence – most likely a robotic presence – on Mars, their bygon Way Station.

That could suggest focus, a strategy to have a facility ready for a future revisit.

Prepare yourself, it implies a purpose for a Return.

To you, the Earth-Mars cylinder seal is both a interpretation of the Past and a foretelling of the Future because it bears a date – a date suggested by the sign of two fishes- the Age of Pisces.

Does it tell us: What had happened in a former Age of Pisces will be duplicated yet again in the Age of Pisces?

If the prophecies are to come true, if the First Things shall be the Last Things, if the Past is the Future – the response has to be Yes.

We are nevertheless in the Age of Pisces. The Return, the signs declare, will occur before the end of our current Age.

Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this article or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Fusion Laced Illusions content!

                                   Facebook  Twitter  google.com/+Fusionlacedillusions0013

• LHC To Go Super Luminous, Chinese Supercollider & CERN WITCH Hunters!
• Israel Conducted Airstrikes Near Damascus
• GFP Newsletter – 11/1/2015
• Monsanto Gets A Kick To The Groin
• ‘Absolute Crap’ but Brilliant: Corporate America’s Plan to ‘Misbehave Without Reproach’
• Zondag met Lubach S03: aflevering 7 (video)
• Fred Thompson, Former Senator and 2008 Presidential Hopeful, Dies at 73
• $20 trillion man: National debt nearly doubles during Obama presidency
• The Recidivist-World’s First Tattooed Motorcycle.
• Bigger Financial Meltdown Starts Before End of Year – Doug Casey