Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Top 10 Worst Military Decisions in World History

Tuesday, December 29, 2015 21:27
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Going to war is a bit of a risk. Effectively carrying out a war to a successful end will require many critical decisions to be made with minimal information. Sometimes, the commander on the field is dealing with bad intelligence, weather, misinformation and possibly a misreading of the military situation. The ten decisions below resulted in a great loss of human life and/or materiel.

 

1. The Invasion of Russia by Napoleon

Napoleon Bonaparte

It seems hard to fathom what Napoleon was thinking when he decided to march 750,000 soldiers into the heart of Russia. Napoleon had the biggest army in the world at the time and needed someone else to conquer. So he chose Russia. They went into Russia with their 750,000 and really never fought that much of a battle. The Russians, being rather savvy, just retreated into their massive country and burned everything to the ground behind them. So, Napoleon arrived in Moscow and little but a charred, smoking mess was left. So the army turned around and went home. But they were harassed for months by the Russian army, had no food. And then the winter set in. Bottom line: 750,000 went in. 250,000 came out.

 

2. The Attack on The Alamo by Santa Anna

Alamo

The old saying is pride goeth before a fall, and that is really what happened with the Alamo. At this time, the city of San Antonio was nothing but a village on an open prairie in south Texas. The Alamo was just this tiny fort in that huge prairie. If Santa Anna had wanted to, he could have just gone around it. But they decided that they needed to use that big Mexican army to make a political statement about the rebellion of the Texas territory. While the Mexican army pretty much wiped out the whole American crew at the Alamo, including Davy Crockett, the government of Texas had time to get better organized and they got the main army into a better position. What resulted soon after was the Battle of San Jacinto, and the Republic of Texas came out of it.

 

3. Failing to Attack the Enemy – Gen. Meade – Civil War

Civil War general meade

When you look at the Civil War, it seems that General Lee for the Confederacy may have had a guardian angel of sorts. Or perhaps the generals he faced from the North were just idiots. The latter seems more likely. In this particular case, General Meade allowed Lee’s army to slip back into Virginia after a devastating loss at Gettysburg.

The Army of Northern Virginia was decimated at Gettysburg. With no reserves left, Lee was struggling to get his severely wounded army back to the friendly confines of the Commonwealth. The army was pinned in by the Potomac river, which was close to flood stage. The roads were mud. The stage truly was set for General Meade to deliver the crushing blow to end the war right there.

Meade, incredibly, never gave the order. He just gathered his forces. And waited. Lincoln was furious when he found out, and it was this incompetence that led to Abe bringing in General Grant from Vicksburg to command the Army of the Potomac.

 

4. Custer’s Failure to Use Gatling Guns

Gatling guns

Most good officers in the military know that it is a good idea to use the best weapons available to them. In 1876, the Gatling Gun was just patented and was the first machine gun readily available. Custer had several of them at his disposal and lots of ammo when he ventured out to dislodge an Indian village on the Little Bighorn River. Custer thought that the guns would slow them down, and he thought that using such a deadly weapon would make him look bad. Custer was a vain man, and this proved to be deadly.

The Gatling Guns surely would have been a huge asset when they were faced with huge numbers of Sioux warriors. He ended up leading 250 soldiers to their deaths.

 

5. Hitler’s Invasion of the Soviet Union

Adolf Hitler

What happened here is pretty much the exact same story as what happened to Napoleon. All you need to do is change the French into Germans and add tanks and airplanes. Hitler was obsessed with creating more living space for the master race in the territory of Russia, so he thought invading Russia at the same time he was fighting the West was a bright idea. Not exactly.

 

6. Lyndon B. Johnson’s Micromanagement of the Vietnam Conflict

Lyndon B Johnson

Wars should be run by professional soldiers, with only general oversight by the politicians. President Johnson did not seem to agree with this. He was not a military man, but he singlehandedly took a small army of ‘American advisors’ in Vietnam into an all out war. Sixty thousand Americans died in this conflict that probably never should have involved so many Americans as it did.

Johnson began to expand our involvement in Vietnam in 1964, but he often led the war with one eye on opinion polls. Wars can’t be won that way.

 

 

Read More

 

Related

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.