| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Author and film-maker Peter Valentino says “NYC was nuked on 911″ in The PAPAMUNDI Files
An Exclusive You Have To See: The Last Frontier of Free Press Is Here! No More Censorship, Unlike YouTube and Others!
 |
| Peter Valentino |
it’s been a long while since the Free Planet blog highlighted the efforts of Russian nuke-commander Dimitri A Khalezov to convince everyone in the modern world that a) NYC was nuked on 911 and b) no planes were used. Khalezov’s assertion has always been that WTC 1, 2 and 7 were each brought down by a 150 kiloton 70m deep underground nuke (as part of their original design spec) was big news for a while then NOTHING…
Oh, apart from Judy Wood asking, “Where did the Towers go?”
Now, author and film-maker Peter Valentino has put together a to-camera piece called the Papamundi Files, NYC Final Conclusions in which he discusses the meat & potatoes of his Kissinger Konfessional polemic-omentary Papamundi and the 911 Mechanism or what we know as the Great Magic Show of September 11th 2001.
An Exclusive You Have To See: The Last Frontier of Free Press Is Here! No More Censorship, Unlike YouTube and Others!
An Exclusive You Have To See: The Last Frontier of Free Press Is Here! No More Censorship, Unlike YouTube and Others!
Source: http://mikephilbin.blogspot.com/2016/01/author-and-film-maker-peter-valentino.html
Very good article and video. Please check out these two BIN articles for more info on this situation.
/9-11-and-ground-zero/2015/09/were-nuclear-demolition-devices-built-into-the-twin-towers-during-construction-2441498.html?currentSplittedPage=6
/alternative/2015/09/5th-gen-uranium-hydride-bomb-3214052.html
Maybe some type of mini nuke was used but the planes were real and not just using project blue-bean holograms
I would go for thermite but the central core that was left standing just after the towers fell down seemed to kind of evaporate so i am not so sure.
Funny now we know that the USA is fully behind AL-CIAda big brother who’s known as ISIS don’t you think
The planes were real, my ass. Anyone who still claims the planes were real has to be one of three. A fool, a coward or one of the criminals who pulled off this sloppy caper. If the media wasn’t in on it, why do we find so many defects in the “special effects movie” that they showed us over and over?
VirusGuard…So clearly written …One must applaud.
Any conflicting interpretation of 9/11 is sheer idiocy.
FACT: Blue-bean holograms, thermite and USA is fully behind $$$ AL-CIAda who’s also known as “ISIS”. Wow! For once on B4IN we got ourselves… “one whom is awake!”
I agree, planes did hit the buildings, apart from the Pentagon which was hit by a cruise missile. The planes were not passenger aircraft which can be clearly decerned from any footage you care to view. In my opinion, small nukes and thermite were used on the towers, so the fuss over either or is irrelevant. It is also quite possible they were built for purpose, ready for a future time when israeli artists will have an entire floor to themselves and their wiring diagrams.
Hologram planes on Sept 11th is right up there with the flat earther’s and lizard people.
NUKES, IF THEY EVEN EXIST, WOULD NOT EXPLAIN THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE WRECKAGE.
the cancer the responders now deal with is most likely from the millions of tonnes of asbestos the towers were riddled with.
Sorry they had no mesothelioma – a distinct medical disease due to asbestos.
How do you explain the severe radioactive burns on the viewers face?
It stinks
Where is the 3700 kg of Titanium per engine which would be immune to both impact and heat. No engines mean we have all watched a CGI movie on tv. There would have been at least 6 lying around.(https://easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/20140416_EASA%20TCDS%20E.061%20issue%2002_1.0_0.pdf)
Unlike a CGI movie, Rolls Royce engines upon impact would have not disappeared they are certainly a lot bigger than anything recovered and I side with Jan Beute, At least 40 kinds of Cancer were caused – the official story of PCB and Asbestosis just cannot cover them especially since the 70,000 fist responders had breathing apparatus and were well versed in hazards associated with the material being exposed to contaminants as part of their job. Simply being a firefighter means entering all the hazardous areas where Asbestos is used and dealing with toxic volatiles as part of the job.
https://youtu.be/zvyc_mlvObE
report on air quality after 911.
80% of each of the towers 50 million ton mass NEVER hit the ground. The steel did not melt, but turned into nano-dust
http://www.henrymakow.com/911_-_nukes_caused_this_devast.html
compare the two pictures – they speak words
Again the first responders handle these hazards every day:
http://www.nfpa.org/research/reports-and-statistics/fires-by-property-type/high-rise-building-fires
http://www.nfpa.org/research/reports-and-statistics/fires-by-property-type/industrial-and-manufacturing-facilities
http://www.nfpa.org/research/reports-and-statistics/fires-by-property-type/storage/structure-fires-in-us-warehouses. The people moist affected would be the 8 million living in New York – the least would be the Fire service, members of which would be entirely aware of the toxic materials released by a high rise building fire and collapse.
but doesn`t a nuke create an EMP that knocks out all electronic gadgets like cell phones, first responder walkie talkies ,cameras ,etc?
There was no EMP on 9/11, was there?
no EMP= no nuke
The nukes (if they were used), were in-bedded in the granite under the buildings foundations. This as well as the building itself would have absorbed most of the ionization as it traveled upwards through the center super structure of the building. The devices were probably small tactical nukes with dialable yields and probably of a special design specifically for the WTC buildings. Nukes can be much lower yield and low radiation dispersal as you can find in the material in these articles below.
There are reports of mini nukes possibly being used in China,Syria, Ukraine a Yemen over the past few years. I can’t prove it but the info is available on the net if you want to find it.
/alternative/2015/09/5th-gen-uranium-hydride-bomb-3214052.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5VNnmAoIYI
/9-11-and-ground-zero/2015/09/were-nuclear-demolition-devices-built-into-the-twin-towers-during-construction-2441498.html?currentSplittedPage=6
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/09/30/vt-nuclear-education-the-history-of-nuclear-weapons-design-1945-to-2015/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapon_design
nuclearweaponarchive.org/News/INESAPTR1.html
whyfiles.org/167new_nukes/3.html
https://cryptome.org/2014/06/wmd-4th-gen-quest.pdf
lots of people have radiation detectors. surely someone recorded radiation levels after the event…
this would be compelling, either way