| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Planet Helion in the Planet X System
Planet Helion? Over the past month we’ve seen an increase in reports of observations of bright objects near the Sun, primarily at the 7 o’clock and 1 o’clock positions. This observation video posted to YouTube on December 20, 2015 presents us with a frightening prospect.
On the basis of what is presented here, this video offers a possible observation of Planet Helion in the Planet X System as described in the book, ‘Being In It for the Species – The Universe Speaks’, by Marshall Masters.
This is a frightening prospect because Helion is the innermost of the three major planets in orbit around Nemesis, the brown dwarf at the center of this incoming mini-constellation. Ergo, if this really is Helion, it’s pretty darn close. That being said, this report can only be construed as preliminary, and is by no means conclusive.
The Helion Video. This below video was posted by Dill Martin on Dec 20, 2015 on his Youtube.com channel with a description (shown below) in which he attributes the video to a “jeff p, all.”
The actual channel is ‘jeff P’. The provenance on this extreme zoom video is so poor that the claims of the maker of this video cannot be substantiated nor are we able to determine if the video equipment is reliable.
Yet, this video does present us with some compellingly credible attributes that I will explain in my analysis below.
Is this a Natural Celestial Object?
There are three reasons why this object of interest could be Helion: lack of surface features, size, brightness
However, before we delve into those issues, we must address a more relevant issue. Is this a natural celestial object?
In studying the video you will see that our Planet Helion candidate moves with the sun in a natural manner behind tree branches, first on the left side and then the right. There are also numerous lens aberrations which are pointed out by the original maker of this video.
So in terms of movement, we’re moving in the right direction.
However, to truly to determine if an object is a natural object or a lens aberration, we at yowusa.com use what I call a “gamma test.” While this is not an absolute test, we have found it to be highly reliable because gamma tests show us if an object is hot or cold. This is critical because hot objects generate light and cold objects do not.
So why is this important?
Natural objects like our sun are hot objects. They create the light we seeing through the camera lens. On the other hand, lens flares and other aberrations are cold objects. They do not create light. Rather, they redirect it from other sources that do create light.
So the whole point of a gamma test is to factor out misleading cold objects, so we can focus our attention on the hot objects.
Working with an HD 720 version of the video I downloaded, I captured the following frame for gamma testing.
Helion Gamma Test
The gamma settings in the image shown to the right are as follows: Brightness - 10. Contrast - 0. Hue - 0. Saturation - 0. Gamma - 0.01
What the test shows is that our Helion candidate is a natural “hot” object.
Of particular interest is the tree branch in the foreground. If you compare the candidate with the sun, there is a marked gradient similarity. Another thing we found quite interesting are the gamma differences between the branch, stems, and leaves.
So assuming this is a natural object, then what could it be?
Why this Object of Interest Could be Helion
There are three reasons why this object of interest could be Helion: lack of surface features, size, brightness.
One of the common debunking attacks we’ve see over the last year is the “lack of surface features” argument that presumes that an object of interest must, like our Moon, present clearly distinguishable surface features.
Because there are no distinguishable surface features on our Helion candidate object, this confirms with clear certainty that it is not our moon – a known object.
What about it being an unknown object? The original video maker claims this object of interest is a moon of Nibiru.
Our analysis shows that it could in fact be the Planet Helion in the Planet X System as described in my book, Being In It for the Species: The Universe Speaks, as noted below.
Being in It for the Species by Marshall Masters
“Planet Helion is a small, bright, uninhabited planet.” ”As a means of determining the various planets’ internal composition, we further learned that Helion is bright because it is a small gas giant.” “Upon learning that Helion is a small gas giant, we further learned that it is seen much like a small sun, from the surface of Nibiru. “ “Helion is bright because it is a small gas giant.” Page 23-24
If Helion is indeed a small gas giant, the debunker expectation of clearly distinguishable surface features does not apply.
Also, size plays a role here as well. In Being In It for the Species the size of Helion is given as 3.5 times the size of Earth (3.5 XE). Does this size qualify to be “a small gas giant?”
Yes, if you consider the fact that Neptune, a known gas giant in our own system is 3.9 times bigger than the Earth.
Planet X System
Major Planets
In the illustration above, Helion is shown as the innermost of the three major planets in the Planet X system, where Nibiru is the outermost.
So if our Helion candidate is in fact Helion, this means that Nemesis, the brown dwarf star at the heart of the Planet X System, is nearing perihelion, its closest distance to the sun.
After that, the guacamole starts to hit to the fan.
A Call for Additional Observations
When people send a picture and say nothing more than “what’s this?”
I usually do not waste any time responding, let alone looking at the images.
In the recent video, “Planet X System Update for November 2015 No. 1 – Major Update No. 3″ (below video), it is explain at 27 minutes in, the five-step evaluation process and exactly how to do our tests.
If the man who made this video had taken the time to think through the details of his post it would have far more useful.
The lack of detailed information in these types of videos, such as the provenance of the video, makes them easy to discredit. It also makes it easier for anyone with an interest in Planet X research to be trivialized and sidelined as “hysterical nutters.”
I’m not only asking for additional observation videos, I’m asking you to think it through so that you can give the public a truly useful reporting.
Following a few guidelines will give these reports a credibility appropriate to the seriousness of the impending consequences of the Planet X System flyby.
I explain exactly how to capture quality still photos and videos and post them credibly the first time in the video, Planet X System Update for November 2015 No. 1 – Major Update No. 3 (above video).
If you see something worth reporting, capture it the right way and make a credible report.
That will make a difference…!
SOURCE: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/hercolobus/esp_hercolobus_112.htm
