Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Musings On The Finite Statist Machine
The following is a SA reply to a question Denice’s son Sam asked regarding the Big Bang’s role in the creation of Earth…. This is of course heresy to current science dogma. But such is dogma, all the advances in science and consciousness have come from the heretics to dogma not the true believers.
Matter comes from consciousness, not the other way around. Matter is just condensed and slowed down light, its precursor is plasma.
The original garden should not be confused with the Garden of Eden. The Garden of Eden storyline is an allusion to the real garden, which still exists, in various places on earth, all interconnected by portals.
- American Kabuki
[12/28/15, 7:52:11 PM] DEAR ONE/SAM. THE BIG BANG IS A THEORY TO DESCRIBE THE CREATION OF YOUR EARTHSPHERE. IT IS A THEORY THAT HAS BEEN MISDIAGNOSED.
THE EARTH WAS NOT CREATED BY THE FUSION/EXPLOSION OF TWO AUTONOMOUS HYDROGEN ATOMS. THE EARTHSPHERE WAS CREATED BY THE INTENT AND IMAGINATION OF THE ORIGINAL ESSENCES.
THE MANNER OF CREATION OF A MASS AS LARGE AS THE EARTHSPHERE IS AS FOLLOWS:
THE DURATION OF THE CREATION OF YOUR EARTHSPHERE IS NOT MEASURABLE IN TIME AS TIME DID NOT EXIST AT THE POINT OF CREATION.
THE BEST ESTIMATION OF THE PROBABILITY OF TIME PASSED SINCE THE FIRST GARDEN AND THE FIRST CREATION IS OVER 100 MILLION OF YOUR KNOWN YEARS.
THIS IS EXCLUSIVE OF TIME LOOPS/TIME SLIPS AND TIMELINE REVERSALS. IN TOTAL LOVEJOY. WE ARE GRATEFUL FOR YOUR QUESTION. DATA COLLECTORS END.