Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Unexpected Ally: Russia Might Get New Partner in Syria, But Who Will It Be?

Sunday, January 3, 2016 11:04
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

An Exclusive You Have To See: The Last Frontier of Free Press Is Here! No More Censorship, Unlike YouTube and Others!

German Chancellor Angela Merkel (R) and Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Chancellery in Berlin.The main topic was the unrest in Syria, as Western powers attempt to persuade the Kremlin to drop its support for the regime of Bashir al-Assad (File)

Unexpected Ally: Russia Might Get New Partner in Syria, But Who Will It Be?

© AFP 2015/ JOHN MACDOUGALL
WORLD

18:34 03.01.2016(updated 18:51 03.01.2016) Get short URL
 

Many think that the events of the First and Second World Wars are essentially ancient history and have no influence on the current geopolitical reality; however, according to American political scientist and journalist Phil Butler, certain long-forgotten ‘technicalities’ might unexpectedly become the golden key to resolving the Syrian crisis…

 

“Not many reading this will know there are many nations still at war with Japan and Germany, as well as other Axis powers, technically, that is,” Phil Butler writes in his article for the website New Eastern Outlook.

Among those are Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, and Syria, he says, ironically adding that, as it turns, “refugees from the region are now streaming into enemy territory by the hundreds of thousands”.

As it happens, back in 1945, when the Allied nations of Britain, France, the US, and USSR assumed supreme authority over the German state, there was “scant documentation of the exactitude of Axis powers’ surrenders and dispositions”.

 

“For Germany in particular, it has been argued that the defeat at the hands of Allied nations was in fact a debellation, or obliteration by warring of a sovereign state.”

Since then, for more than 70 years already, Germany has been “a vassal of Britain and the United States”. However, just one document could change it all.

During the years of the Second World War, the region of the Middle East was embraced with the ideas of T.E. Lawrence, better known as Lawrence of Arabia, who had promoted the idea of a free and cohesive Middle East.

An Exclusive You Have To See: The Last Frontier of Free Press Is Here! No More Censorship, Unlike YouTube and Others!

 

Col. T.E. Lawrence,, shown Oct. 3, 1928, the mystery man of the desert, who is known as the ?uncrowned king of Arabia, is reported on a secret mission in Afghanistan. He?s supposed to be negotiating a treaty between Great Britain and the Amir Amanullah
© AP PHOTO
Col. T.E. Lawrence,, shown Oct. 3, 1928, the mystery man of the desert, who is known as the ?uncrowned king of Arabia,” is reported on a secret mission in Afghanistan. He?s supposed to be negotiating a treaty between Great Britain and the Amir Amanullah

Thomas Edward Lawrence was a British archaeologist, military officer, and diplomat.

“Assigned by British Army Intelligence to form up an Arab army of revolt against the Ottoman Turks, Lawrence later became disillusioned with the partitioning of Arabia after the war. He was particularly disenchanted by the crown’s efforts to establish a Jewish state in the middle of Palestine,” Butler says.

His ideas were much feared by the West and back in 1941, already after his mysterious death in 1935, the Western powers launched the so-called Syria–Lebanon campaign, also known as Operation Exporter.

 

“The battle for Syria and Lebanon saw fighting in the same places we see ISIL (Daesh), Al-Qaeda, the so-called moderate jihadists and other “proxy” fighters killing one another today. The ancient city of Palmyra and many parts of Iraq were bloodstained until the Armistice of Saint Jean d’Acre basically turned Syria and Lebanon over to Britain,” says the political scientist.

 

“Syria and these other nations declared war on Nazi Germany afterwards, but there never was a cessation document officially signed in between Germany and these states.”

The signing of this particular document, the author says, might be the very key to a peaceful end game in Syria.

“A treaty now, in between Syria, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, and other nations who’ve not officially signed such declarations accomplishes three very important functions.”

“First and foremost, for instance, a Bashar Hafez al-Assad brokered “truce” in between these nations forwards the concept of Arabian independence T. E. Lawrence advocated. Assad as the catalyst would indemnify many Islamic tenants, and refute for millions the potential of a new Ottoman Empire, which some profess is in the works.”

“Secondly, a treaty in between Germany and Syria in particular, would vehemently realign the western alliance strategy. Or in other words, dash any neocon or bankster play to destroy and fragment the Middle East further.”

 

“Finally, and perhaps most significantly, the German republic finalizing the past and casting off the last vestiges of the Nazi legacy, would once and for all free the German people from the yoke of allied control.”

 

Therefore, Europe aligned in peace with Middle Eastern countries, and more importantly on the ideological side of Russia, equals world peace by the sheer magnitude of the proposition, the political scientist concludes.

“Germany is one key to a resolute peace, for American and Britain alone stand no chance at hegemony alone.”

At least this is his theory.

An Exclusive You Have To See: The Last Frontier of Free Press Is Here! No More Censorship, Unlike YouTube and Others!

Read more: http://sputniknews.com/world/20160103/1032636515/syria-germany-peaceful-treaty.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 2 comments
  • Interesting… this is a fact that could crash NATO legs…

  • Germany is well and truly under the comtrol of the USA due to secret treaties that were signed at the end of WWII and many of the rules were also agreed with the old USSR but as soon as the berlin wall came down NATO ripped up it’s agreements with the USSR and would not past them over to Russia.

    This has allowed the USA under jewish banker control to move it’s missiles up close to the russian border and now russia is pushing back, it’s tried to play nice but it didn’t pan out too well for them.

    Everyone in power in Europe knows the rules about NATO and also knows who is behind ISIS and they will be falling over themselves to void the agreement if Russia is force to use a tactical nuke against anyone in Europe or Turkey so long as it’s not France or Germany and i would only be guessing if i added the UK to that list.

    Would you jump off a bridge if your mate was in the wrong and asked you to jump with him ?

    The USA is more so under the control of the bankers than any other nation here on earth and i would suspect any attempt to launch nuclear missile without agreement from “Partners” on european soil would be meet with Europe attacking the USA and Israel and thats if Europe does not have covert plans in place to stop the launch of missiles.

    Yes i know russia would not do this unless its a last option but you have to bear in mind that Russia did not invite the americans to poke there noses in to places like the Ukraine or Syria and they will at all costs defend themselves and now they have nukes in Syria up against the borders with Israel so any bankers are going to think twice before pulling any string in Washington DC.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.