Weaponized Cell Towers, Frequency Triggered Diseases and Culling !
Weaponized Cell Towers, Frequency
Triggered Diseases And Culling !
This rabbit hole runs very deep and the subject matter gets quite technical and a bit Science Fictiony at times but it is very real and presently deployed and in use.
It is not my intent to produce a smooth flowing, well thought out article concerning these deployed technologies. My intent is to present some data dots for YOU to connect and to stir up your curiosity and investigative desires so YOU will begin the quest for truth about these matters for your self. To truely get a hold of a subject, YOU must invest your time researching the data, only then will you begin to recognize the real value of truth.
Please dig into this subject and bring what you discover forward for the benefit of all who choose to awaken themselves.
Happy data mining.
Knarlydawg
http://www.stopthecrime.net/mind.html
http://stopthecrime.net/source.html
http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/nasa-thefutureof-war.pdf
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/gorenberg_ppt.pdf
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/ElectromagWeapons.pdf
A fractal is a pattern that repeats itself on more than one scale, like a square full of squares — or a cloud, coastline or mountain which may be small or large, but has more or less the same shape at any size. DNA is a 6-foot long coiled “ladder” of base pair steps that coils into bigger coils into bigger coils. The fractal pattern of the coiled DNA molecule may cause it to be sensitive to a large number of different frequency bands — whether produced by nature or human technology. This map offers a very basic overview of the topic, with highlighted links to a study and excellent presentation by Dr. Martin Blank. webassets/EMFandDNA090815LG.jpg Electromagnetic fields have been shown in a number of (but not all) studies to damage and/or alter some functions of DNA and RNA. This map is an introduction to information offered by some important researchers in this field. It includes links to audio presentations and articles as well as a large (but not exhaustive) selection of studies.
Electromagnetic fields have been shown in a number of (but not all) studies to damage and/or alter some functions of DNA and RNA. This map is an introduction to information offered by some important researchers in this field. It includes links to audio presentations and articles as well as a large (but not exhaustive) selection of studies.
Epub 2011 Feb 28. DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields.
Abstract Send to: Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Apr;87(4):409-15. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2011.538130.
Blank M1, Goodman R. Author information 1Department of Physiology, Columbia University, New York 10032, USA. [email protected]
Abstract PURPOSE: To review the responses of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) to electromagnetic fields (EMF) in different frequency ranges, and characterise the properties of DNA as an antenna.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined published reports of increased stress protein levels and DNA strand breaks due to EMF interactions, both of which are indicative of DNA damage. We also considered antenna properties such as electronic conduction within DNA and its compact structure in the nucleus.
RESULTS: EMF interactions with DNA are similar over a range of non-ionising frequencies, i.e., extremely low frequency (ELF) and radio frequency (RF) ranges. There are similar effects in the ionising range, but the reactions are more complex.
CONCLUSIONS: The wide frequency range of interaction with EMF is the functional characteristic of a fractal antenna, and DNA appears to possess the two structural characteristics of fractal antennas, electronic conduction and self symmetry. These properties contribute to greater reactivity of DNA with EMF in the environment, and the DNA damage could account for increases in cancer epidemiology, as well as variations in the rate of chemical evolution in early geologic history. Comment in Comments on DNA as a fractal antenna.
[Int J Radiat Biol. 2011] PMID: 21457072 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
http://www.oscillatorium.com/id22.html
Bacteria on the Radio: DNA Could Act as Antenna
Theoretical physicists have proposed an explanation for how bacteria might transmit electromagnetic signals: Chromosomes could act like antennae, with electrons traveling gene circuits to produce species-specific wavelengths. It’s just a hypothesis, and the notion that bacteria can generate radio waves is controversial. But according to Northeastern University physicist Allan Widom, calculations based on the properties of DNA and electrons square with what’s been measured.
“For a long time, there have been signals in water. Something is happening around a kilohertz,” said Widom, lead author of a paper posted April 15 on the preprint website arXiv.
“You have to look for natural energy levels in the system that would give you a kilohertz frequency. With the lengths of DNA and the mass of the electron, you get the right frequency range for these signals.”
Click to Open Overlay Gallery Frequency analyses of recordings made from purified water (above) and water enriched with E. coli (below). Image courtesy Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences The original report of bacterial radio transmissions was made by French virologist Luc Montagnier, who in 2009 described how inductor coils wrapped around flasks of bacteria-enriched water and hooked to an amplifier detected signals in the 1-kilohertz range.
Montagnier’s findings were greeted with considerable skepticism. Though his work linking HIV and AIDS had earned Montagnier a Nobel Prize, his observations of bacterial radio waves — on their own a novel, never-before-seen finding — were followed by even-more-radical descriptions of signals causing loose pieces of DNA to assemble into bacterialike structures. He also speculated about related “nanostructures” in water, which he linked to neurodegenerative diseases.
The claims were embraced by homeopaths, and Montagnier himself became involved in a dubiously designed clinical trial of autistic children. Eventually he left France to head a research institute at Jiaotong University in Shanghai, telling Science that he sought to escape the constrictions of intellectually fearful European scientists. “It’s not pseudoscience. It’s not quackery. These are real phenomena which deserve further study,” he said.
‘The bacteria that set up nanowires are, on an evolutionary scale, fairly old. It’s occurred to me that more modern bacteria may use wireless.’
Underneath all the controversy, however, are the original recordings of bacteria-enriched water. Widom considers them sound. The next question, then, is how bacteria produce electromagnetic waves around a 1-kilohertz frequency. In Widom’s arXiv paper, he and other physicists calculate that as electrons flowed through loops of DNA in E. coli and Mycoplasma pirum, the species tested by Montagnier, they should generate wavelengths similar to what was recorded.
“Different species have different lengths of DNA” in their chromosomes, he said. “These lengths probably determine frequency.”
Widom noted that electromagnetic radio transmissions were not in principle so different from electron transmission between bacteria connected by nanowires. Such bacteria have been described in recent years. Their nanowire-enabled transmissions may allow networked microbes to communicate.
“This could be a wireless version,” said Widom. “Bacteria that set up nanowires are, on an evolutionary scale, fairly old. It’s occurred to me that more modern bacteria may use wireless.”
Widom is especially curious about whether cells in higher life forms might also use electromagnetic signaling, perhaps in coordinating DNA code with protein-making cellular machinery. But as a theoretical physicist, he doesn’t plan to investigate the phenomenon himself. That’s for other researchers to do, Widom said.
“We’re just saying that this gets you to the right frequencies,” he said. “We’re right at the very beginning.”
Hat tip to Technology Review.
Update 4/27: Commenter beebeeo rightly points out that bacterial nanowire communication is not so conclusively described as the article made it sound. Rather than saying “nanowire-enabled transmissions allow networked microbes to communicate,” I should have said they may do so. The qualifier has now been added.
Top photo: E. coli (Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation)
See Also:
Op-Ed: Microbes May Be More Networked Than You Are
Deep-Sea Bacteria Form Avatar-Style Electrochemical Networks
Microbe May Answer Mystery of Multicellular Life
There’s No Such Thing as a ‘Simple’ Organism
Citation: “Electromagnetic Signals from Bacterial DNA.” By A. Widom, J. Swain, Y. N. Srivastava, S. Sivasubramanian. arXiv, April 15, 2011.
Fair Use Notice
This article may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Section 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:
- 1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
-2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
-3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
-4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
Article 19 of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights
ARTICLE 19. …..Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
(The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948) “A cantankerous press, an obstinate press, an ubiquitous press, must be suffered by those in authority in order to preserve the even greater values of freedom of expression and the right of the people to know,” Judge Gurfein declared. “These are troubled times. There is no greater safety valve for discontent and cynicism about the affairs of government than freedom of expression in any form.” (Excerpt from a New York Times editorial of June 20, 1971, in The Pentagon Papers, 1971, p. 645)
You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information
Is there a way to destroy these towers?
All you have to do is BELIEVE in reality. Then your cosmic vibration beingness will protect you.
This thread looks like disinfo.
DNA is working on “Scalar Waves”.
Prof. Konstantin Meyl the New Tesla
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKTkpC-DHZ8
Prof. Meyl: Junk DNA No Junk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ng-uZ_wD7Uc
There is no disinfo in this piece. My article went up hours before the other two articles on this subject and this info is further supported by those articles. That being said, I am aware of scalar standing wave energies and Tom Bearden’s works on the subject (http://www.cheniere.org/) and how disease states can be induced in individuals or groups of individuals at a distance etc.
If you take note of my brief comment at the beginning of the article you will see that this piece was put together in order to stimulate interest in the subject and to perhaps cause the readers to further their investigations of the subject matter. It is a starting point article not an exhaustive encyclopedia of all possibilities. Scalar energies are another aspect that influence our DNA but not the only one.
Further more, the first video you cite is in German thus of little value to the majority of English speaking readers and your “disinfo” accusation brings your motives into question. Perhaps your motives are not so honorable.
Not to diminish the importance of Scalar Energy involvement in this subject….. but perhaps you should check out your info more closely as it seems that Dr. Meyl’s paper “Task of the introns, cell communication explained by field physics.” has been Retracted. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3271197/)