Profile image
By Last Days Watchman (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Hank Hanegraaff, the Most Prominent Calvinist Theologian against Prosperity Gospel, Leaves Calvinism

Monday, April 10, 2017 20:25
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Hank Hanegraaff, the Most Prominent Calvinist Theologian against Prosperity Gospel, Leaves Calvinism
By Julio Severo
Known as the “Bible Answer Man,” Hank Hanegraaff was receivedthis week, through chrismation, in the Orthodox Church. Originally a Reformed Presbyterian, he became famous in the Christian Research Institute (CRI), the conservative Protestant countercult and apologetic ministry which Walter Martin founded in 1960.

While the CRI’ founder focused on real heresies, after Martin’s death Hanegraaff became president of CRI and expanded its focus to perceived heresies, especially among Pentecostals and charismatics. Differently from Martin, the Prosperity Gospel was Hanegraaff’s special negative attention.

In contrast, his special positive attention was Calvinism. In his article “Why I Am a Calvinist,” published on the CRI website, Hanegraaff said, “I’m not afraid to be called a Calvinist. I’ve read the Institutes multiple times, most of Calvin’s commentaries, and was voted ‘Calvin Clone’ by my peers at seminary. I thank God for Calvin.”
Hanegraaff turned CRI into a war machine against the Prosperity Gospel. He became a main reference against this theology. Even the Lausanne Movement, of the Lausanne Congress on World Evangelization, quoted him in the article “The Prosperity Gospel: A Critique of the Way the Bible is Used,” saying that “Hank Hanegraaff has traced the roots of many of these prosperity and faith teachers to the metaphysical cults.”
The most important meeting held by the Lausanne Movement against the Prosperity Gospel happened in Brazil in 2014, and it was led by Rev. Valdir Steuernagel, a Brazilian Lutheran minister who is a militant of the Theology of Integral Mission (TIM), which is the Protestant version of Liberation Theology.
Steuernagel’s denomination in Brazil is heavily involved in Liberation Theology, Gay Theology and TIM, but his worry is the Prosperity Gospel, which is not present in his church and has not brought the Gay Theology to his denomination.
In Brazil, Marxists and TIM militants hate the Prosperity Gospel and Marxist philosopher Marilena Chaui said that this theology is the number 1 enemy of the socialist revolution in Brazil. I do not understand this theology completely, but I see positively that it is a resistance to the socialist revolution in Brazil.
In the CRI’s list of heresies is “Charismatic/Pentecostal.” Hanegraaff even criticizes John Wimber over signs and wonders. Wimber was a Calvinist.
What kind of Calvinist was Hanegraaff if he could not accept Calvinist Wimber doing signs and wonders in the name of Jesus? Are signs and wonders against the Bible? If so, Jesus and his apostles were against the Bible.
Yet, Hanegraaff seems to have no difficulty to endorseProtestants activists who fight Israel and promote the Palestinian cause.
Hanegraaff was committed and solid in his Calvinist faith. What has happened? I do not know, but in Brazil many cessationist Calvinists who say that they have a “apologetic ministry” have focused on the Prosperity Gospel. Interestingly, this theology does not affect Calvinist churches in Brazil, in Europe and America. Even so, these churches are victims of the theological liberalism brought specially by the Social Gospel (very similar to TIM), and the result is: support to abortion, sodomy, stances against Israel, etc.
The Prosperity Gospel has zero influence in these liberal problems in Calvinist churches. So it is surprising that Calvinist apologetic ministries focus on this theology and largely dismiss the Social Gospel, which affects these churches.
Hanegraaff seems to have burnt out advocating Calvinism and fighting the charismatic and Pentecostal movement. If he wanted traditionalism, actually a Presbyterian church is only midway to it. The Catholic Church, or the Orthodox Church, is the only way for those wanting to embrace total traditionalism. This was Hanegraaff’s choice.
Do not get me wrong. I appreciate Wimber’s Calvinism. But a Christianity without signs and wonders leaves its adherents disorientated and dry. This was Hanegraaff’s case.
Hanegraaff turned the Christian Research Institute into a war machine against Pentecostals and charismatics because he was a Calvinist.
Hanegraaff turned the Christian Research Institute into a war machine against the Prosperity Gospel because he was a Calvinist.
What about now that he has left Calvinism?
For him, was Calvinism wrong after all?
Recommended Reading:
To follow Julio Severo in Twitter and Facebook: Twitter: Facebook:


Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.