Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By American Birding Association (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

When is a Clapper Rail not a Clapper Rail?

Sunday, May 18, 2014 5:02
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

With the five way split of the large North American Rallus looking more and more likely, the question as to what to call this new quintet of closely related species is getting a little bit of attention. When I reported on the proposal as submitted and published by the AOU Check-list Committee (and previously by Paul Hess and Ted Floyd), I noted that the default decision might be to retain the well-known names King and Clapper Rail for those species in the east, while creating a new moniker for the newly split subspecies, notably Ridgway’s Rail for the subspecies of Clapper Rail in southern California and Baja. That subspecies, obsoletus, has been known alternately as “Light-footed” Clapper Rail or “California” Clapper Rail. Neither named seemed to strike the fancy of the AOU committee members.

A King Rail and a Clapper Rails, or a Elegant Rail and a Saltmarsh Rail? photo by Corey Finger

A Clapper Rail and a King Rails, or a Saltmarsh Rail and a Elegant Rail? photo by Corey Finger

While easy for North American birders to adjust to, retaining a common name previously used for the pre-split species for one of the new forms is generally not done so as to avoid confusion. See, for instance, the split of Sage Sparrow into Bell’s and Sagebrush Sparrows. That’s not to say there’s no precedent for it, of course, and the name Winter Wren still can confuse those who can’t be certain a birder is referring to the formerly Holarctic megaspecies or the new, and much more range-restricted, incarnation of the name. The argument for retaining King and Clapper may be based in ease of use, as with the wren, but one could just as easily see similar confusion sown in Rallus.

So what to do then? The AOU is currently discussion how best to resolve the matter. Will we still explore coastal saltmarshes for Clapper Rail? Or will it be Saltmarsh Rail? And what of the western subspecies? Ridgway’s, Light-footed, California, or something else?

The draft supplement is due soon, but the AOU is still interested in hearing the opinion of birders as to the potential name changes at stake here. So please let us know in the comments how you feel about it.

Questions to consider: Would retaining Clapper Rail to refer to the eastern subspecies be confusing given the long history of the name referring to both eastern and western subspecies? Is Saltmarsh Rail an appropriate alternative for the eastern ssp? What would be a good name for the obsoletus ssp of California and Baja California? Should the name King Rail be retained, given no potential confusion species in the ABA Area?

My own answers are 1) Yes, 2) Yes, 3) Light-footed or California, and 4) No, but I’m curious to hear what others have to say.



Source: http://blog.aba.org/2014/05/when-is-a-clapper-rail-not-a-clapper-rail.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=when-is-a-clapper-rail-not-a-clapper-rail

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.