Profile image
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Police exercise in Westminster provides cover for yet another false event

Wednesday, March 22, 2017 17:26
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Police exercise in Westminster provides cover for yet another false event

Casualties on stretchers with no look of pain.

‘Blood’ on faces of ‘casualties’ looking perfectly fine, still wearing spectacles.

Car on pavement which had been parked at angle inconsistent with narrative.

Paramedics strolling around with patient on stretcher not even looking at them.

Then they said there was a police exercise taking place the same day, and I walked home as certain as anyone could be that this was yet another false event.

Maybe others have seen more than this as I only watched for a very few minutes.

What did you see?

Here’s some of the baloney provided by the mainstream media –

Witness Quentin Letts said he saw a man in black attack a police officer outside Parliament before being shot two or three times as he tried to storm into the House of Commons.

“I saw a thick-set man in black clothes come through the gates into New Palace Yard, just below Big Ben,” he told the BBC.

“He had something in his hand, it looked like a stick of some sort, and he was challenged by a couple of policemen in yellow jackets.

“And one of the yellow-jacketed policemen fell down and we could see the man in black moving his arm in a way that suggested he was stabbing or striking the yellow-jacketed policeman.”

You would think anyone could tell the difference between a stabbing and a striking action.

When did a knife last look like a stick?

This is baloney.

He quite obviously saw nothing and is waffling, as he has been requested to do, and is no doubt being paid. If Letts had seen the incident as he claims, he would have no doubt as to what he saw. He is padding out his reply as he’s lying.

Was the man shot either two or three times?

You think he couldn’t tell how many shots there were, or remember which it was?

Come on!

(Letts pictured laying on more televised nonsense on an earlier occasion).

Let’s have the CCTV footage please to confirm the evidence provided by Quentin Letts, or otherwise.

Oh! Don’t tell me. The cameras weren’t working! I guarantee you will never see any CCTV footage, as this event did not happen.

Thought so.. Interestingly the CCTV cameras for Westminster were reported to have been taken off-line as of September, apparently due to the costs of maintaining them. (…)

And here he is – the attacker (above) – shot three times (or twice) with no visible blood, and with his left arm still held on the stretcher even though it’s hanging over the edge.

That requires muscle power and consciousness.

How do people believe as this stuff? Palpable nonsense.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
  • DK

    I would belive the false flag narrative but for the fact that over 3000 people would have witnessed the car running over pedestrians over the bridge, quite a few while sitting in their vehicles.

    The Counter terrorist exercise was on Sunday March 19th, the attack on the 22nd – when everyone had gone home.

    There will be bus, HGV, private hire vehicle and other dashcam footage of the event all will have been sized by the police as evidence. Including of course phone footage.

    Other than that London is not Paris, you can hire casualty extras abut the corpse extras were totally real.

    the problem is too much footage not releasable to the public because of the potential backlash.

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.