Steve Chapman on Obama and Romney vs. the Bill of Rights

Back in the early days of the Republic, the
framers went to great trouble to draft and ratify the Bill of
Rights. And every four years, our leaders pay homage to the framers
by neglecting or disparaging that creation.

Not all of it, of course. Americans generally favor religious
freedom (the First Amendment) and the right to own guns (Second).
But the ban on any establishment of religion (First) is a favorite
target of believers who think the government has a sacred duty to
promote Christianity.

Then there are the Fourth Amendment, which bans unreasonable
searches, and the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees the right
against self-incrimination. These are often seen as obstructions
erected for the perverse benefit of bad people, who would not be so
bad if they had read more Bible stories in school.

So politicians rarely rise to defend these provisions or the
rights they safeguard. Civil liberties, writes Steve Chapman, are
the Penn State Nittany Lions of our political realm: They have many
enemies, and their friends often look embarrassed.

View this article.

2012-08-23 15:16:35

Source: http://reason.com/archives/2012/08/23/the-candidates-vs-the-bill-of-rights