| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
Do You Really Own Your Home?
The move to confiscate all privately held wealth in the United States is well underway. In the past few years, we have experienced bail-outs, planned bail-ins, Treasury Secretary Jack Lew is positioning to confiscate all 401k’s and pensions and now the MERS mortgage fraud is accelerating to new heights thanks to a rash of recent State Supreme Court decisions affirming the Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) right to foreclose on your home without having recorded a valid title and the foreclosure can take place outside of a courtroom.
Who is the real Linda Green?
For the past 230+ years, the Constitution protected property rights from would-be feudal lords who would suddenly appear with a title to your home and force you out. This practice worked well until the introduction of the MERS Mortgage fraud.
MERS was a conglomeration created by the megabanks for the purpose of administering mortgages. The practice quickly got out of control as one’s home mortgage title could be transfered dozens of times without notifying the homeowner. The practice quickly turned illegal when a homeowner, unknown to them, would be paying their mortgage to a title company that no longer held the title to their home. Then, the title company which currently held the note would show up and lay claim to the home in a repossession proceeding. In some cases, people with completely paid off mortgages had their homes stolen. Eventually, the people pushed back.
Show Me the Note
At the present rate, it will not be long until private home ownership will become a rare event.
Eventually, activists like Dave Kreiger, author of Clouded Titles, began to train local officials on how establish a chain of custody one a title. Eventually, the “Show me the note” strategy worked well in court as long as one had an attorney and many illegal foreclosures were headed off. Then MERS restored to the illegal practice of “Robo-signors” in which people off the street were paid to forge a homeowners signature on a series of title transfer documents. The issue of illegitimate foreclosures were at a stand off. However, at least homeowners would have their day in court and they could challenge the legitimacy of the title transfer documents. Recently, because MERS parent organizations of Wells Fargo and Bank of America have begun to exercise undue influence in the State Supreme Courts all across this nation, every homeowner is potentially in peril.
The State Supreme Courts
A rash of State Supreme Court decisions ranging from Illinois, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,New Hampshire, California, Indiana, Washington, Colorado and most recently Washington and West Virginia have overturned lower court decision which demanded that MERS produce a chain of custody for titles and that all foreclosures must take place in court. Unfortunately, MERS no longer has to take you to court to steal your property. They no longer have to file a dead of transfer with the court. Thanks to these rulings, they can simply should up and seize your property based upon fraudulent or flimsy evidence. These recent decisions are setting a precedent all across the country for other courts follow.
From Fascism to Feudalism
The late Aaron Russo made a documentary entitled America: From Freedom to Fascism. Russo was correct, America has been under the control of corporations and the banks. However, Fascism is preferable to what we now face. With the ongoing elimination of private wealth across this country, I would entitle the trend cure to be, America: From Fascism to Feudalism.
MERS Is Flaunting Their Criminal Behavior
Because I have been an outspoken critic of MERS, I find it interesting that MERS chose to include me in their email distribution list in which they bragged about yesterday’s West Virgina’s Supreme Court decision which does not require MERS to demonstrate a chain of custody or a mortgage title and MERS can foreclose outside of court. Here is an excerpt of the press release.
“Reston, Virginia, February 10, 2015—MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. today announced that the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia held recording statutes in West Virginia do not require that the assignment of a trust deed be recorded in the office of the clerk of the county commission.”
Conclusion
The United States is quickly descending down the path of serfdom in a 21st century application of modern day feudalism. We are witnessing the rapid decent of what once was the most dynamic and wealthiest empire in the history of the planet, to a country which will soon be labeled as a Third World country. These times are marked by the elite moving to own everything and using the power of the government to accomplish their end-game. Congress is complicit as is the judiciary.
When America emerges from the coming economic collapse, the middle class of this country will own nothing. We will all find ourselves living on the feudal manner with no property rights, bank account or pension. We will soon awaken to the fact that our Constitution is dead and with it all of our rights. And amazingly, we did virtually nothing to stop it.
Appendix
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Janis Smith
Phone: 703-738-0230
Email: [email protected]
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Determines
State Recording Statutes do not Require the Recording of Assignments of Trust Deeds
Lower Court Exceeded Jurisdiction in Denying Motion to Dismiss
Reston, Virginia, February 10, 2015—MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. today announced that the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia held recording statutes in West Virginia do not require that the assignment of a trust deed be recorded in the office of the clerk of the county commission.
In State of WV v. Warren McGraw, the Court disagreed with Wyoming County’s claims that the recording of trust deed assignments in county record books is required by state law, “in order to clear title to properties in the Counties.” While the Counties did not name MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. or Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc. (MERS) as a defendant in the case, the allegations in the complaint were focused on challenging the operations of MERS and the MERS® System.
In his opinion, West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Justice Menis E. Ketchum II said that “recording statutes in West Virginia do not require that the assignment of a trust deed be recorded in the office of the clerk of the county commission.”
“We are pleased that the West Virginia Supreme Court found that the lower court – the Circuit Court of Wyoming County – exceeded its jurisdiction in denying the Trustees’ motion to dismiss and is directed to dismiss the County’s action with prejudice,” said MERSCORP Holdings Vice President for Corporate Communications, Janis Smith.
At loan origination, MERS is designated by the lender and the borrower in the trust deed as the beneficiary as the nominee for the lender and the lender’s successors and assigns. The trust deed is recorded in the applicable land records and a recording fee is paid. As long as the sale of the promissory note involves MERS® System Members, MERS remains the beneficiary of the trust deed and the transfer of the note is tracked on the MERS® System.
For descriptions of cases and other materials pertaining to MERS’ business model and role in U.S. housing, please visit www.mersinc.org.
###
MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. is a privately held corporation that owns and manages the MERS®System and all other MERS® products. It is a member-based organization made up of thousands of lenders, servicers, sub-servicers, investors and government institutions. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) serves as the mortgagee in the land records for loans registered on the MERS® System, and is a nominee (or agent) for the owner of the promissory note. The MERS® System is a national electronic database that tracks changes in mortgage servicing and beneficial ownership interests in residential mortgage loans on behalf of its members.
Feudalism where YOU & YOUR FAMILY OWN NOTHING is coming fast!
IF FOR SOME REASON YOU DO NOT BELIEVE DAVE, READ THIS ARTICLE & YOU WILL:
/economics-and-politics/2014/10/to-senator-elizabeth-warren-the-most-corrupt-foreclosure-in-america-2470436.html
The Courts via Outrageously Corrupt Judges & Attorneys do not believe that you own anything or have any rights whatsoever. This article linked proves that Their Is No Due Process Of Law or Constitutional Rights in courtrooms today. (((( AND that goes for Family & Criminal Courts as well. How else could the U.S. have 7 times the incarceration rate as China? )))) Dave is also right that they can steal your home without you ever seeing the inside of a courtroom. The Judge here cancelled jury trial at last minute from home while babysitting instead of coming to final pre-trail hearing days before trial was to begin & converted it to summary judgment. Oh yeah. Plaintiff, BNY Mellon managed her retirement money. So its ok…we have no rights if THE TRUTH IS INCONVENIENT & EXPOSES THEIR FRAUD.
Judges have numerous “Undisclosed Conflicts Of Interest” and in my case the 1st Judge did not disclose #1 her husband was employed by the bank, #2 that her retirement was with them & #3 that the county sold millions of dollars in bonds to them for instant cash to roll across their desk (some slipping into their drawers of course).
READ EM & WEEP. CORRUPT JUDGES & ATTORNEYS HAVE ALREADY DESTROYED AMERICA!
WELCOME TO MY NIGHTMARE
I completely agree. However, there is a way to perfected title to the land on your home, its called a “Land Patent.” The Bureau of Land Management has these land patents on file depending on your state waiting for you to make the claim to that patent, for which you can record to affect the title to real estate. http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/default.aspx. I am in Ohio, this is the Ohio Revised Code for that recording. http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/5301.252. This means that you own the proper chain of title to the “LAND” which gives you superior title to all other equitable “junior titles,” and every appellate and supreme court rulings to back it up.
.” Fenn Vs Holmes, 21 Howard 48
Wilcox v. Jackson, 13 PET (U.S.) 498 10 L.Ed. 264;
Howth v. Farrar, C.C.A Tex., 94 F.2d 654, 658;
McCoy v. Lowrie, 42 Wash.2d 24, Black’s Law Sixth Ed;
Wineman v. Gastrell, 54 FED 819, 2 IS Ap. 58;
And here are quotes from these rulings:
A. The Land Patent is permanent and cannot be changed by the government after its issuance. “Where the United States has parted with title by a patent legally issued, and upon surveys made by itself and approved by the proper department, the title so granted cannot be impaired by any subsequent survey made by the government for its own purposes.” Cage v. Danks, 13 LA.ANN 128; and
B. Immunity from collateral attack by any person, city, state, county or Federal Government: Collins vs. Bartlett, 44 CAL 371; Webber vs Pere Marquette Bloom Co, 62 Mich 626, 30 NW 469; Surgent vs. Doe, 24 Miss 118: Pittsmont Copper Co. vs Vanina, 71 Mont 44, 227 Pac 46; Green vs Barker, 47 Neb 934, 66 NW 1032.
In addition, if you have an outstanding promissory note with investors and you have your note from the first time you signed it, use that promissory note and assign it either to the pretender lender or FmHA by using this Code of Federal Regulation; http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=0bc685ff21c27c32d17530e6aafaa1cd&node=se7.12.1901_1508&rgn=div8
You see Ladies and Gentlemen, your promissory note paid your house in full at the time that you signed the note, look at it again, it is a BLANK CHECK folks; that’s why it states on there, “pay to the order of” whoever is the assignee. When the lender deposited the note and did not credit your checking account and disclose the liability that the bank now owes you, you now know that the bank violated GAAP and will be in big trouble if you report them to the US treasury. Call the IRS and ask them for a copy of the 1099 A that was filed on your commercial name (all caps name) I bet its says “the borrower is not liable for the debt.” wanna bet? . Another thing you have to understand, attorney’s that practice law in home foreclosures are debt collectors and subject to the FDCPA. Also, remember this, who did not give value and consideration to the note has no attachment and enforceability to the security agreement; per UCC 9 203 (B); and does not qualify as a “holder in due course” UCC 3 303, which makes their contract “Ultra Vires.” Stop being suckered by parasite lawyers who have an surety bond and oath, go after that and you change the game.
Another matter of importance, the courts are acting on our consent, period. “State your name for the record; Bob Smith; Mr smith how do you plead; Not guilty; DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE MATTER BEFORE YOU MR SMITH; Yes,” you just consented to participate in their fraud. Here is your proof: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/4108 Transferring to the UNITED STATES of AMERICA MEANS ACCEPTING THE CORPORATIONS OFFER TO CONTRACT.
igot1thatcansee,
I did claim rights to Land Patent & there is more on this preferred to be off-record for now.
Can share that with you if you contact me via phone or email. Contact info is at end of the article linked in my comment above. You are the first to offer a serious list of case precedents to back up a Land Patent. I am interested in any and all information like this to protect my home & civil rights.
There seems to be no limit to how far these idiots will go to give everything I have to BNY Mellon, even though they committed RICO Act Violations, altered loan contract, perjury, made false statements & much more. I refuse to give up my rights or home NO MATTER WHAT!
These crooks can all go pound salt where the sun does not shine.
The reality is that unless you own a country – the ‘land’ you own is never truly yours to do with as you will. For example you could own half of a county in the UK, but you’d still have to go to the councils to erect any kind of properties on that land.
Without sounding like I’m part of the Mossad dust bunny conspiracy I’m really wondering if there is any point for the average person in owning any land if they have no control over its use. Let’s be honest as it stands it could be subject to compulsory purchase, and no amount of gun laws, standing your ground etc. Short of changing constitutions, laws and who knows what else.
In the UK for example there is Freehold (you own the land) and Leasehold (you lease the land for say 100 years and renew), but the reality is you don’t have much say what you can do with it and that is absolutely crazy. So you can have a situation where you buy some land thinking you can build and find no planning permission.
It seems that the ultimate goal of quantitative easing, which includes the purchasing by central banks of monetised mortgage debt, is the ownership of everyone’s property by (Rothschild) central banks, via that monetised mortgage debt. https://deuteronomy4verse2.wordpress.com/2014/08/03/quantitative-easing-ultimate-goal/
you never own your home or land as the conracts state you are a tennant on their property even though you pay them for it
This does not worry me one bit.
Because if they did it under false pretenses it makes whatever they do NULL & VOID. Anyone who has any uh, common sense would know that.
And if it unconstitutional, more so they can be ignored and prosecuted and then HANGED! They know this that is why Demonrcats and liberals are so desperate for your guns and a police state.
The real sheeple is not you and me. The real sheeple will be those that side with the criminals in office and there are many of them. The FBI, the CIA, the police, the sham courts, evil judges, liberals, federal employees, and most Negroes.
I believe the military, our most important assets as patriots should not be included. If they are then we are really lost.
If you believe you now, or ever have, owned your home or property, stop paying property taxes for 3-years straight and watch what happens.
YOU DO NOT OWN YOUR PROPERTY! PERIOD! You are merely allowed to live on that land, by decree of the Queen (of England).
All you ‘Constitutional Patriots’ clearly have no idea who you bow to, and they’ve convinced you that paying taxes is constitutional (when in fact, it is merely a carryover to British tradition and the Crown).
Crying about the banks and MERS is to totally ignore the million-pound elephant in the room – GOVERNMENT.
In fact he is right but nothing you own is yours really, just borrowing it approx 80yrs then we are gone, dead.
“You don’t own anything” , Relly should read – you don’t have title to anything ,
It all has to do with registration , when you register a” thing ” like a car ,home , property, your new babies NAME when it’s borrn .
It Then gives whom ever you registered That ” thing ” with ( which is always the government ) LEGAL title and you get owner / operators title.
if here in Australia if we do not pay our land taxes then I’m afraid the local government can sell us up. and take it all in reasonable retribution. No you can never own your land while a land tax is in force. Rural are lesser than urban as we do not have rubbish collections or sewer charges something like $1200 yr for rural domestic and $3000+ yr for urban serviced areas. no matter how hard off you are land taxes have to be paid
This is one reason you should never give up your weapons ,this way you can protect from such tyrants that want to take whats yours.
If you think the exact same thing can’t happen in America (with weapons), then you’ve OBVIOUSLY never been to a tax foreclosure sale on a farm before.
3-years late taxes (2, in some states) and the county reposesses your land and sells it to the highest bidder to recoup back taxes. If they sell it for $10,000 and you owe $40,000 in taxes and $100,000 in a mortgage, then either the bank will take lean on it to the county, pay the taxes and take the property, or the auction will be forced to occur and the total $140,000 debt will be offset by the $10,000 proceeds and you will STILL OWE $130,000 that will be court ordered to payment.
There is nothing different between Australia and America, except they have gun control and Obama hasn’t finished implementing ours yet.
It is the same here in America, depending on the state being either judicial or non-judicial, will either sue you, or sell your home in a sheriff sale. As far as property tax is concern, here in America, it is all based on your consent through contracts, check your mortgage, it has a property tax clause. You can opt out of property taxes with a withdrawal consent form to the county auditors office, if you have a land patent recorded in your county land office, and yes they will fight you on it, you just have iron will and the subject matter fully researched you can be successful.
No, you don’t own anything. In fact, I have owned the same home since the 70s and the amount of property tax that I’ve paid now exceeds the original purchase price of the house. The mortgage payments were just paying for the illusion that i owned something while in reality, the corporation looked at me as a tenant, rent due.
NO I won’t be using MERS…Thank You
Yes we all know the ownership trick pulled by most jurisdictions! I am a tenant of the land only having equity title and title of use i would require alloidel title to be the actual owner
As a Sovereign living breathing human being I hereby make the following Statements
1) Corporate Statutes, rules, regulations, Codes, Civil laws do not apply to a Sovereign public absent a contract that complies with the Law of Contracts.
2) I Do not consent to or grant jurisdiction in the matter.
3) I Do not understand the charges against me.
4) The offer to contract is not accepted.
5) I do not consent to being surety for this case and these proceedings.
6) I demand the bond be immediately brought forward so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged.
7) Not Actionable all rights unalienable claimed, know and reserved without prejudice.
8) The court lacks Subject Matter Jurisdiction as there is no flesh and blood victim. Subject matter jurisdiction requires: A competent witness or notarized affidavit demonstrating and injury. A statutory or common law basis for a remedy of the injury.
9) Proof of jurisdiction must appear on the record of the court.
10) The prosecution lacks standing. The Supreme Court has made it clear that the burden of establishing standing rests on the plaintiff. Standing has to exist at the time the case is filed. For “Standing to exist” there has to be an “injury in fact”.
As you are the executive administrator, who has been appointed as trustee aka jon doe by the court clerk to administer the fictitious corporate entity that was created by and is owned by the state and known as CEST TUI QUE TRUST you are instructed to do the following.
You are herby authorized to handle the accounting and dissolve this constructive trust. I now claim my body so I am collapsing the CQV trust which you have charged, as there is no value in it. Charging a trust with no value in it is fraud.