| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
RE: UK Must Prepare for War with Russia: Army Calls for Fleet of Battle Tanks to Take on Putin
A moral tale, war should not be a business
The problem with demanding more and better chariots because Empire B has better chariots is that we no longer make them in Empire A because we sold off the state owned manufacturer to the faction which wants war with Empire B so it can plunder its resources for the second time, during the period of peace while Empire B was being plundered the faction could no longer sell chariots in Empire A and downsized the manufacturing base having promised to protect in the national interest during privatization, then based itself in tax havens and used clever accounting so the only real asset it has in Empire A is the plaque on the main office wall.
It then turns the faction had supplied chariots where ammunition for the carried weapons had to be manually loaded where the Empire B chariots had automatic reloading, the weapons carried could not be upgraded and were inaccurate and bent due to a cost cutting curing process and the production line was closed for well over a decade.
As it turns out the faction which supplies the chariots makes more from supplying paper project super weapons, crisis lobbying Empire A about the threats to it from Empire B because Empire B managed to gaol all the oligarchs (breaking its yoke) plundering the nation on its behalf than it did than actually supplying weapons, and made most of its other wealth via hostile takeovers with zero percent interest loans of rival manufacturers who’s better products were sold on at a premium from factories based in the lowest cost countries.
All we can be really certain about buying new and better chariots to fight Empire B is that the war will be fought on behalf of the chariot makers, they will be far more expensive than Empire B’s, they only will be assembled here from non Empire A parts and while this is all going on the owners of the faction supplying chariots will be creating Empire C out of Empire A and B (while living the life of Riley from stupid peoples money in tax havens and little walled enclaves free from Empire A’s annoying laws).
Proven by:
- The better flying machine project where an antique no longer manufactured flying machine was adapted at great cost to compete with a mass produced allies product because it was to be made in Empire A, depleting the treasury of vast sums of gold which could better have been spent on a licensed copy with Empire A parts, a project whitch totally failed to deliver and which was repeated once again because the design of the aircraft was one made in Empire A (and silly buggers still believed that because it was assembled here it was made here).
- The Indivdual Weapon, the ultimate arnament for warriors which was many times more expensive than rival weapons, fell apart with a sneeze, ceased to work with the slighest ingress of dust and came without the promised attachments then went through many expensive programs to get it to work.
Your an idiot
At least I grammar check, last time I checked you cannot possess idiocy.
More than likely they will DUMP BARRY like Germany did and go help Russia.
The Uk has been owned the filthy jew bag money changers longer than the US INC. The jew god of the bibles filthy jew bag money changers took over the UK when they installed their central Bank in the 1600′s.
mixing metaphors, along with fiction as truth, are we not?
For those dunce and dense enough to use BIN as their news source, please tell me how can one have a “fleet” of tanks? Consider the definition of “fleet”:
fleet1
flēt/Submit
noun
the largest group of naval vessels under one commander, organized for specific tactical or other purposes.
“an invasion fleet”
a country’s navy.
noun: the fleet
“the US fleet”
synonyms: navy, naval force, (naval) task force, armada, flotilla, squadron, convoy
“the fleet set sail”
a group of ships sailing together, engaged in the same activity, or under the same ownership.
“the small port supports a fishing fleet”
And of course the title is correct though not ‘mine’, the term tank was coined as subterfuge in WWI and is AFV the term fleet is also absolutely correct because heavy tanks were originally classed land battleships and were designed when Sir Winston Churchill First lord of the Admiralty heard of the concept of the Holt tractor in 1915, the Royal Navy created the Landships Committee to investigate the use of Armored tractors, ultimately failing but the concept continued until the ‘His Majesty’s Landship Centipede’ the first successful AFV.
P.S. A dictionary contains a great deal of accepted academic terminology not actually correct since it was written by people not involved. They are not researched history books but reference material used for Grammar and spelling with limited space.
No 100% pure truth, the allegory tale has just had the specific actors names removed because we have been played by these actors time and time again since the saga of the First rates.
Time is short, open your eyes and open your heart, accept Christ as your lord and savior, repent and help bring the lost to Jesus Yashua….. TIME IS short! God bless!
Why fight Russia? Aren’t they the ones dealing blows to the dreaded ISIS? If you can’t smell a rat, you have no sense of smell. Russia bombing ISIS is synonymous with Russia bombing US/UK. Now we have that lunatic in the WH McCain throwing in his deranged perspective, along with Muslim Brotherhood clan leader BH Obama being exposed for their treachery, someone is going to have to pay and it won’t be them or their family members. Boo Hiss to anyone who wishes to stop Russia from doing what America has been trying to accomplish by creating a war in Syria.