| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Strange UFO Flying Over Mars Photographed By Curiosity Rover
Tuesday, May 27, 2014 14:53
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
This photographer taken by the Mars Curiosity Rover appears to show a large object moving in Mars atmosphere.
Credit: Jason Hunter
This object which can be found in other Mars photographs resembles that of a spacecraft of some type of satellite.
Credit: Jason Hunter
You can find the original photo by clicking here http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00586/opgs/edr/ncam/NRB_449531881EDR_F0300820NCAM00551M_.JPG
Happy UFO hunting! Be sure to check out the UFO sightings blog at
http://ufosightingz.blogspot.com
Music by UFO Clouds
Some people shouldn’t have been the sperm that made it to the egg. I question this person who video’d it. That is a lens artifact from the light on the camera. It moves with the light source.
the fact of the matter is, PBS, regardless of the “importance” of your fallacious statement, and trust me, it just ain’t that relevant…remains the obvious, namely, IT IS NOT YOUR DECISION TO MAKE.
For whatever reason, there is somebody out there who just might think that YOU shouldn’t be allowed to exist. What if they were at the helm, and not you? You wouldn’t be making that statement because you wouldn’t BE. Just because you’ve made a statement that you assume puts you on top and everybody with whom you don’t agree at the bottom, doesn’t mean squat-diddly. You are in a very long line of dead morons who said that very thing. (the key word in that last sentence is ‘dead’, by the way). You know, just because I think you are a misanthrope, by your own words, you cast yourself in that light. Therefore, I decree that YOU DO NOT EXIST. you are a spam bot, spewing out trash just like a fax machine.
Actually most of his articles are the opposite of the general flavor of fear porn and so on that is the preferred topics of clicking for much of the people here on BIN.
I do agree that the negative assumption added before mentioning the light artifact is un called for, but two wrongs do not make a right and the drastic approach you have taken makes you look much much worse then the original comment you found upsetting…
i wasnt going to comment, but PWS.com i was thinking the same thing, plus there is another one to the far right, artifact.