Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
The pro-Israeli government of Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is making diplomatic and military preparations for military intervention in Syria, leaked documents show.
Canada’s National Defense has drawn up at least five scenarios for the country’s military mission in Syria, according to documents obtained by the Ottawa Citizen.
In one scenario, Canada recognizes “a legitimate armed opposition group” fighting to overthrow the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
To justify a war on Syria, the National Defense alludes to “the rapidly deteriorating conditions in Syria, its impact on neighboring countries and … the importance of Middle East stability.”
Daniel Blouin, spokesman for the National Defense, has described such plans as “routine to significant international events.”
Separate documents reveal that Canada has been training alternatives to Assad’s government.
Um, Canada does not have the transports to get our little army over there, and Harper is not going to invade a country that does not share a border with us, nor is a threat to us.
Sorry, this is all Before It’s News fiction….
We are america’s bitch. We won’t invade anyone. We provide support for america’s incursions. I hope Putin knows he doesn’t have to nuke us. If he removes america then we’ll be his bitch. I wish Harper would act like the bottom bitch he is, instead of pretending Canada has any muscle or brains of its own…
Come now folks: pull your heads out of the fishbowl, it distorts your vision. We can take it as read that every country has “plans” to invade everyone else. What’s the alternative? To just turn up, when told to, and wing it?
Unless the headline reads “A plans to invade B and it goes down Tuesday week!!!” then it’s nothing more than an article about the 95% sheer boredom that is Military life.
I’d raise an eyebrow if they were doing the crazy eye roll, claiming there are no such plans and doing a lot of low tuneless whistling. Get my point? I expect there to be detailed plans on what to do “if”.
I don’t care what the “if” is. I don’t care because the pretext is usually trumped up anyway. Despite John Kerry’s assertion that…
“You just don’t, in the 21st century, behave in a 19th century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped up pre-text.”
… any idea America? How far you lot fell in global esteem when the feeble, and demented, old codger dropped that little pearl. Risable! I’ll save you the effort of opening a dictionary in a whole new tab. We are laughing at you and embarrassed for your ludicrous secretary of state.