Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Robert J. Samuelson on why getting the government involved in the happiness movement href="http://blog.acton.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy53YXNoaW5ndG9ucG9zdC5jb20vb3BpbmlvbnMvdGhlLWdsb2JhbC1oYXBwaW5lc3MtZGVyYnkvMjAxMi8wNC8xNS9nSVFBSldpOEpUX3N0b3J5Lmh0bWw=">will make us all miserable:
id="more-31613">
We ought to leave “happiness” to novelists and philosophers — and rescue it from the economists and psychologists who think it can be distilled into a “science” and translated into pro-happiness policies. Fat chance. Government can often mitigate sources of unhappiness (starvation, unemployment, disease), but happiness is more than the absence of misery. If we could manufacture happiness, we could repeal the “human condition.”
href="http://blog.acton.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2Jsb2cuYWN0b24ub3JnL2FyY2hpdmVzLzMxNjEzLWdvdmVybm1lbnQtY2Fubm90LWNyZWF0ZS1oYXBwaW5lc3MuaHRtbA==" class=\"more-link\">Read more on Government Cannot Create Happiness…
src="http://blog.acton.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=31613" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />
Read more at Acton Institute PowerBlog