Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Supernatural Spirit
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

The Tangled Web of Life

Saturday, January 31, 2015 20:24
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

THIS POST WILL EXPLAIN AND REVEAL THE WEB OF LIFE IN EVOLUTION TO THE WORLD.


 

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cDovLzQuYnAuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tLy1GYzlGeGtSOWxlRS9WTWlVbUNRTjEtSS9BQUFBQUFBQVNHSS9ReGVGVVNEMnJzcy9zMTYwMC9UaGUtVGFuZ2xlZC1XZWItb2YtTGlmZS1PcmlnaW4tb2YtU3BlY2llcy1DcmVhdGlvbi1Fdm9sdXRpb24tRGlzY292ZXJ5LVNjaWVuY2UtQmlvbG9neS1EYXJ3aW4tV2FzLVdyb25nLUFib3V0LVRyZWUtb2YtTGlmZS1CaWJsaWNhbC5qcGc=
The tree of life is a metaphor used to describe the relationships between organisms, both living and extinct. Its use dates back to at least the early 1800s. It was employed by Charles Darwin to express the concept of the branching divergence of varieties and then species in a process of common descent from ancestors. But did the Tree of Life ever belong to the Theory of Evolution? And if not, who has claimed its title forever? Has new scientific evidence completely transformed Darwin’s tree into a tangled web?
 

- PREVIEW –
THE TANGLED WEB OF LIFE

Did the Tree of Life ever belong to Evolutionists? Scientific Evidence will be examined. SCIENCE. BIOLOGY. EVOLUTION. WEB OF LIFE. CREATION.
— Supernatural Spirit (@spiritworldblog) January 28, 2015


- PART I –
FROM A TREE TO A WEB

 


“Here we have the facts. What conclusions can we draw from them?”
THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD
 
 


“Cutting down the Tree of Life and re-writing science to support the new evidence – which happens to align with God’s Word.”


 

Read: Path to the Sciences to understand this information much better. 
“The Twisted directions of scientific discoveries revealed!”
   


You Know This:
Scientific Discoveries change the Sciences all the time.

 


Science Deniers Are Freaking Out About “Cosmos”
Denying evolution: Sunday’s episode of Cosmos was all about evolution. It closely followed the rhetorical strategy of Charles Darwin’s world-changing 1859 book, On the Origin of Species, beginning with an example of “artificial selection” by breeders (Darwin used pigeons, Cosmos used domestic dogs) to get us ready to appreciate the far vaster power of natural selection. It employed Darwin’s favorite metaphor: the “tree of life,” an analogy that helps us see how all organisms are living on different branches of the same hereditary tree. However, now after Episode 02 of ‘Cosmos: A Space-time Odyssey’, its “tree” title has been officially removed from the text books/or e-books.

 

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cDovLzIuYnAuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tLy1JV0ZGOVRGWDJRTS9WTWllbjNHbDRJSS9BQUFBQUFBQVNHcy93N0NQYjhIemhJcy9zMTYwMC9OZXctU2NpZW50aXN0LURhcndpbi1XYXMtV3JvbmctQ3V0dGluZy1Eb3duLXRoZS1UcmVlLW9mLUxpZmUtQ292ZXIuanBn

New Scientist: Cutting Down the tree of life.
DARWIN WAS WRONG about the TREE of LIFE.

 


- WATCH VIDEO –

 


@0:16 “This is the way Darwin saw the tree of life as he sketched it in around July 1837.
The concept has branches . . .”

@1:07 The advantage in the scientific method, it’s that it makes new discoveries and the model is updated to become more accurate.
 


Who can claim the Tree of Life?

Was the Tree of Life stolen and re-written in an attempt to demolish God’s Word?
 


The Tree of Life (Evolutionary Biology) 
[Cut Down and Abandoned]

Tree of life (Biblical Creation)
[Still Standing]

 

 
PREVIEW ACCESS: The Tangled Web of Life
 
 

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.