Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By whiteowlconspiracy.com
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

New Zealand Orders FBI Release Evidence Against Kim Dotcom

Thursday, August 16, 2012 6:54
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)


B4INREMOTE-aHR0cDovLzMuYnAuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tLy1Ed194UnBnY1Zicy9VQ3p5X3RiYTdlSS9BQUFBQUFBQUVxWS9MVExmSlVLbk1vRS9zMjAwLzEuanBn

rt.com

A New Zealand judge dealt a blow Thursday to US prosecution efforts against Megaupload co-founder Kim Dotcom, upholding his right to view evidence against him in order to prepare a defense against his extradition hearing.

Prosecutors had hoped to overturn the decision, issued in May. New Zealand Justice Helen Winkelmann upheld the ruling.

“Without access to materials relevant to the extradition hearing phase, the person sought will be significantly constrained in his or her ability to participate in the hearing,” Winkelmann wrote in her decision.

US prosecutors have withheld information against Dotcom (born Kim Schmitz), and are pressing New Zealand to extradite him to America, where they hope to try him on charges of copyright infringement, racketeering and money laundering, claiming that Dotcom made 175 million dollars in illegal profits through online file-sharing. Dotcom argued that Megaupload only offered online storage, not file-sharing.Much of the evidence gathered by prosecutors was obtained during a January raid on an estate Dotcom was renting in Auckland. Several computers, hard drives and cars were confiscated during the raid. A New Zealand court had previously ruled that the seizure was illegal, which would force the prosecution to eventually disclose the information it hoped to use as evidence.

New Zealand District Court Judge David Harvey ruled in May that Dotcom had a right to see the evidence: “In my view there must be fairness and the hearing and balance must be struck, otherwise the record of case becomes dominant virtually to the exclusion of everything else and places the extradition process in danger of becoming an administrative one rather than judicial.”

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.