Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Economist's View (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

‘Niall, Babe, I Got One Word for You: Census’

Tuesday, August 21, 2012 14:11
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Niall Ferguson doesn't know what he is talking about:


Open Mouth, Insert Foot: Going Viral?, by Invictus
: I had barely finished
reading Niall Ferguson’s takedown of President Obama when a flood of 
takedowns of Mr. Ferguson started hitting the web. This post, then, will not be
about his Newsweek piece, but instead about his recent Bloomberg TV

interview with Erik Schatzker and Sara Eisen
. And, in particular, one very
specific part of that interview where Ferguson makes what is well beyond what I
could even charitably refer to as a rookie mistake. …

At 3:55 into the clip, Sara asks Ferguson about the private sector job gains
versus the massive public sector job losses we’ve seen under Obama. (I’d add, as
Sara alluded to, that this private sector recovery continues to exceed what we
saw in the last two recessions…)

Here’s what, by my transcription, Ferguson had to say (emphasis mine):

Well, that’s not really a part of the argument I made in the piece. The point
I made in the piece was that the stimulus had a very short-term effect, which is
very clear if you look , for example, at the Federal employment numbers there’s
a huge spike in early 2010 and then it falls back down.

Bloomberg went on to show the following graphic…:

Spike

Niall, babe, I got one word for you:
Census.

The spike in the graphic above – which Ferguson claims is stimulus-related –
is actually Census-related. … In May 2010, for example, there were – referring
to the above-linked document – 564,000 temporary Census workers on the Fed’s
payroll that Ferguson seems to think were related to Obama’s stimulus package.
As one would expect, as the Census was completed, the government just “shut that
whole thing down”…

As I recently discussed with BR, and as he has written about countless times,
this is the risk one runs when letting one’s ideology run wild – that one
twists, contorts, and distorts the facts (in extreme cases, perhaps, without
even realizing it) to fit one’s narrative.

A mistake regarding such a fundamental matter is inexcusable…



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.