Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Truth Excavator
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

The Great Satan’s War Against Syria; “We use means only used by the devil.”

Tuesday, October 9, 2012 4:11
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

The Great Satan: I Want You To Fund And Arm The Terrorists In Syria.

An excerpt from a New York Times article called, “Cajoling, Drugging and More as Rebels Try to Draw Defectors” by Kareem Fahim and Hwaida Saad:

“But now opposition commanders say defections have slowed to a trickle.
Some commanders have given up trying to entice defectors, and others
have resorted to more desperate measures: cajoling, duping, threatening
and even drugging and kidnapping military men to get them to change
sides, or at least stay out of the fight. Without defections, they say,
the opposition cannot hope to grow, never mind prevail. 

“We use means only used by the devil,” said Ahmed Qunatri, a rebel commander in northern Syria who defected from the Republican Guard.”

An excerpt from, “Escalation and madness” by Clifford Kiracofe:

“It seems that the fog of war has already settled in to some degree. What scenarios are we looking at here? We have the Anglo-French war against Syria backed by the US ongoing. The Anglo-French and the US are allied to the Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia and the Qataris who in turn are supporting the Salafi and Wahhabi terrorists inside Syria who move in and out of Turkey for safe haven and staging. We have Salafi brigades from Libya and Tunisia and so on in the mix in Syria, again moving in and out of Turkey as safe haven. The Turks are in a neo-Ottoman expansionist mode spurred by massive investments from the Gulfis/Wahhabis who have their own global jihad ongoing. Add in the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt and its secret and not so secret branches in other lands such as Syria. Now we have an escalation of tension between Turkey and Syria. Turks attack Syria next? With NATO or without NATO? US joins in. One would then expect a reply from Syria and its allies such as Russia, Iran, factions in Lebanon. Thus regional war involving Iran? Presumably, Iranians are patriotic folk who will support their government whether or not they agree with it. This seemed to be the case in the 1980s. Iranians rally to defend their country. There are a lot of them and they have some serious organizations such as the Rev Guards and also asymmetric capabilities. Iran replies by setting the Gulf states on fire so to speak. Israel cannot defend against CBW. So nukes not needed and Iran does not have them anyways. In the regional war, if not general war, the Israelis attempt to “transfer” all Palestinians out of Israel and the West Bank. This engenders still more chaos. Can Israel and the Zionist experiment survive in such circumstances? And does the Jewish Agency really care as it readjusts its strategic global diaspora management?”



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.