Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

The Middle Class Faces Extinction—So Does The American Dream

Wednesday, June 5, 2013 12:50
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Income inequality is now as high as it’s been since the Great Depression, and the middle class is nearly extinct.

Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com/ baranq

June 3, 2013  |  
 

Alternet

This article first appeared in the  Los Angeles Review of Books.

Inequality is now one of the biggest political and economic challenges facing the United States. Not that long ago, the gap between rich and poor barely registered on the political Richter scale. Now the growing income divide, an issue that dominated the presidential election debate, has turned into one of the hottest topics of the age. 

Postwar American history divides into two halves. For the first three decades, those on middle and low incomes did well out of rising prosperity and inequality fell. In the second half, roughly from the mid–1970s, this process went into reverse. Set on apparent autopilot, the gains from growth were heavily colonized by the superrich, leaving the bulk of the workforce with little better than stagnant incomes.

The return of inequality to levels last seen in the 1920s has had a profound effect on American society, its values, and its economy. The United States led the world in the building of a majority middle class. As early as 1956, the celebrated sociologist, C. Wright Mills, wrote that American society had become “less a pyramid with a flat base than a fat diamond with a bulging middle.”

That bulge has been on a diet. The chairman of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers — Professor Alan Krueger — has shown how the size of the American middle class (households with annual incomes within 50 percent of the midpoint of the income distribution) has been heading backwards from a peak of more than a half in the late 1970s to 40 percent now. The “diamond” has gone. The social shape of America now looks more like a contorted “hourglass” with a pronounced bulge at the top, a long thin stem in the middle, and a fat bulge at the bottom. One of the most significant effects of America’s hourglass society has been the capping of opportunities and the emergence of downward mobility amongst the middle classes, a process that began well before the recession. Around 100 million Americans — a third of the population — live below or fractionally above the poverty level. A quarter of the American workforce end up in low-paid jobs, the highest rate across rich nations, while the wealthiest 400 Americans have the same combined wealth as the poorest half — over 150 million people.

Read More Here

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 3 comments
  • This article may be right about income levels, but it is wrong to call for government redistribution by means it does not specify.

    Incomes in the US have stagnated because of the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs. Losing those cost at least another trillion dollars annually from the GDP and cut tax receipts as well. Manufacturing was the foundation of the middle class since it produced real things and generated real incomes to support shopkeepers, grocers, etc. Lately the US has become more of a service sector economy and that mostly selling cheap junk made in China.

    The financial sector has gotten as big as it has because of the Federal Reserve. By not allowing the “bust” end of the business cycle to clear excess money from the economy, that excess money has piled up and lead to bubble after bubble. Indeed the Fed has made things worse by dumping in more money each time making the bubbles even bigger. Eventually, likely this time or the next, the bubble burst will be too big for the Fed to contain and the economy will be hammered. This could be really bad since banks are still holding and trading in the debt derivatives that caused the 2008 crisis to the tune of many, many times the value of the entire global GDP, perhaps $60 trillion or higher. No one is really sure because of how the banks and the Fed have hidden those things in the books.

    So, without the industrialization of America and rampantly growing government, the middle class would still be solid. Government can’t redistribute the wealth by any kind of plans or taxes better than bringing back manufacturing would. All government will end up doing is making the lesser rich as poor as the middle and lower classes while the connected rich get richer.

  • The only people on the planet with any ‘rights’ are women; which shows you how screwed up the world really has become.

  • Htos1

    The proletariat does NOT allow for a powerful middle-class.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.