Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
by J. D. Heyes, Natural News:
Americans are slowly but surely losing all control over their government, as evidenced anew by the refusal of a federal agency head to appear before the people’s representatives in Congress.
As the Federal Communications Commission gets ready to issue major new rules for the Internet that are misnamed “Net Neutrality,” its chairman, Tom Wheeler, has refused to appear before the House Government Oversight Committee, the very panel charged with overseeing such bureaucracies and ensuring that Americans are not being abused by them.
The committee’s chairman, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, as well as Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Fred Upton, R-Michigan, criticized Wheeler for refusing, despite the fact that “the future of the Internet is at stake.”
IF you ask government employees if their CONstitution and laws automatically apply to everyone, their collective opinion is that YES, their CONstitution and laws apply to everyone, automatically. BUT if you ask them what facts they rely on that PROVE their BELIEF that it is applicable to you, they have no plausible answer, they’ll hang up on you, feign as though they don’t understand the question, tell you that they aren’t going to debate with you “EVEN THOUGH ALL YOU DID WAS ASK FOR FACTUAL PROOF OF THEIR ASSERTION OF JURISDICTION”
Everyone has been told that the CONstitution and law automatically apply to everyone. it’s everyones opinion that it applies, everyone feels it applies, everyone believes it applies, everyone assumes and presumes it applies. HOWEVER; hearsay, opinions, feelings, beliefs, assumptions and presumptions aren’t proof of a damn thing.
What factual, first hand, irrefutable evidence can anyone offer that proves that their CONstitution and laws apply to the private person simply because they are physically in what we commonly refer to as a state.
Keeping in mind that slavery and involuntary servitude is illegal. Further, no private person is a party to their CONstitution nor is any private person a signatory to their CONstitution, nor has any private person sworn an oath to be bound by or to obey the CONstitution and laws.
Do you grasp the gravity of NOT being a party to some agreement, contract, compact or constitution??
When one is NOT a party to some agreement, contract, compact or CONstitution, then one is NOT BOUND TO OBEY IT OR ANY PROMULGATIONS ARISING FROM SAID INSTRUMENT! “those promulgations would be codes, policies, statutes and laws etc”
Who precisely is a party to their CONstitution?? The States are parties to the CONstitution. NOT YOU, THE LIVING BREATHING FLESH AND BLOOD MAN/WOMAN!!
Should you choose to accept the challenge to show your proof/evidence. Adhere to the following;
Your proof/evidence MUST be factual and personal first hand information, your proof/evidence shall not be comprised of hearsay, your opinions, other people’s opinions, your beliefs, others beliefs, your feelings, others feelings, your assumptions and presumptions, others assumptions and presumptions, hypotheticals, conjecture, sophistry, fraud, lies, scenarios or what if’s.
Good luck!