Still Report #504 – Why Lie About Nukes?
from Bill Still
to become Partner #429: www.billstill.com, then Click “Subscribe”
Bitcoin address: 15Ucde9jSR7UezG8w4Lgk3jMhiCebc4veG
The level of lying in the Obama White House has now reached a new low.
Why should any official of the U.S. government have cause to lie about the greatest threat to our survival as a species – the existence of nuclear weapons on ballistic missiles in the hands of the world’s most unreliable nations?
I reported earlier this week that North Korea announced that it had tested its first ICBM-capable hydrogen bomb. I ran with the story before the administration started up with their protestations that North Korea was lying.
However, I stand by the story because the world’s seismic experts, the US Coast & Geodetic Survey, were first out of the gate to confirm a typical bomb-related seismic event had occurred at the exact time and place that North Korea claimed that they had conducted the test, deep under ground.
Why does the White House feel compelled to lie about it?
[insert Adm. John Kirby]
Why do they run Admiral John Kirby out to try to lie his way out of this one? Kirby was recently fired by Sec. of Defense Ash Carter as Pentagon spokesman after Sen. John McCain called him an idiot.
Why is it so important for Democrat Presidents to lie to the American people about nuclear bombs?
As the New York Post put it, even if the White House is not lying about it, then North Korea:
“… ‘only’ has plain-old atomic bombs. What a … relief?”
Well, there is a long and sordid history behind this and most of you are too young to remember. As the Spanish philosopher George Santayana wrote in 1905:
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
And this is a prime example of a mistake that Democrats seem doomed to repeat and I can’t figure out why.
It first came out that N. Korea was building atomic weapons in 1994 thanks to CIA reports.
Many of us remember how President Bill Clinton dispatched former President Jimmy Carter to Korea to deal with the problem. In the words of the Post Carter:
“… negotiated a sellout deal that gave North Korea two new nuclear reactors and $5 billion cash for a promise from N. Korea to stop its nuclear weapons program.”
Many of us complained as loudly as we could at the time, knowing Clinton and Carter were up to something bad. Unfortunately, I did not have my newspaper then, and YouTube had not yet been invented.
Incredibly, Carter won the Nobel Prize for this outrageous Korean giveaway.
Even more incredible, by 2002, the N. Koreans admitted that they started violating the Nobel-prize-winning agreement from day one, and 4 years later, in 2006, N. Korea conducted their first atomic bomb test.
So is Obama still trying to cover for Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter selling out the safety of the world to an insane dictator?
Well, Obama now has his own nuclear sell-out deal in Iran, but instead of giving away $5 billion, the price of poker has been raised. This time, the US has given Iran 150 billion dollars, and 20 years from now, another Democrat president is going to have to cover for this treasonous act.
Why do we have to pay these guys to not tell on us at the time we are lying to help make them a nuclear power?
I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.
Source: http://financialsurvivalnetwork.com/2016/01/still-report-504-why-lie-about-nukes/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=still-report-504-why-lie-about-nukes
