Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Capitalists@Work (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Reflections on a Piece of Bullshit PR

Sunday, March 12, 2017 3:45
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

The National Grid, upon whom we all depend, glories in a comfortable statutory monopoly with its more-or-less guaranted rate of return and a very cosy relationship with government and regulators alike.  Still, it feels the need to boast.

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cHM6Ly8zLmJwLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbS8tamhvSVRaV01qLXMvV01VVVV6aTRjTUkvQUFBQUFBQUFGSncvT19uUlZfYkdxbmtRRkNUU1NCOFpuV1E5NVhKVmpKQ2RRQ0xjQi9zNjQwL2dyaWQucG5n


Well, they posed the question and, given the monopoly thing, it’s a very important question.  Intuitively the answer of course is – well, your being a monopoly we confidently expect you are inefficient – it’s just a question of scale.  As it happens, a lot of the old CEGB inefficiency (which was grotesque, BTW) was kicked out of the system in the decade or so following privatisation.  But it’s been creeping back, courtesy of the renewables upsurge.  The aforesaid authorities rely totally upon the Grid to facilitate their manic policies, and don’t feel inclined to question them particularly closely on how they go about it.**

Anyhow: having posed the fateful question, the Grid declines to answer it, relying on the usual PR sleight of hand.  Are we efficient?  Well, it’s all very difficult as we hope you understand.

And – boy, oh boy – are we effective!!  99.9999% reliable!!  Six nines!!  Go Grid !!

This raises some interesting issues.

  1. Effectiveness has minimal bearing on efficiency, even if the first 3 letters are the same.  I assume, however, that loads of suckers are focus-group proven not to notice the difference.
  2. The whole matter is one of Gold Plating – the old CEGB disease.  We know you can be staggeringly effective if you throw money at it.  Our money.
  3. WTF does six nines mean in this context anyway?  One hour’s unreliability in 120 years?  The Grid hasn’t been around that long.  One second in 12 days?  (Incidentally, ‘grid reliability’ isn’t what most people would be thinking about, because blackouts happen all the time: but almost all of them occur at the distribution level – storm damage, pneumatic drill through cable etc – for which National Grid is not responsible.  It’s more to do with ‘quality of electricity’.)
  4. Most weightily:  what is the optimum degree of reliability?  Thoughtful people realise that the cost of going from, say, five nines to six nines is many times greater than going from four to five.  Who needs six?  There may be an answer to that question: it will probably be the manufacturers of ultra-high-tech electrical components.  But they typically modulate their power supplies themselves, so as to be even more sure.

Yup, this is a big question, and one the politicians leave to the Grid to decide for themselves.  But there are potentially massive efficiencies to be had from a true optimisation of reliability.  Suppose hypothetically it was noticed that no-one drank tap water, but bought their own in plastic bottles.  What, then, would be the point in treating all mains water to be potable, as at present?  It’s obvious that for some overwhemingly vast percentage of all usage of mains-water, its costly potable quality goes to waste.  It’s the same with grid reliability: who really needs six nines?  Maybe they should get what they need in a different way.  Maybe the Grid should even pay for the cost of their doing so …

Not something we can solve on a Sunday morning.  One more observation on the Grid, though.  Just a very few years ago they told us we needed a capacity margin (i.e. excess of power generating capacity over peak demand) of 20%.  Funnily enough, now that it’s negative, they tell us that we only need 6% (and they procure the top-up in various costly ways). 

Yeah, funny that.  Efficient?  Effective?  Eff ….  Lay off the bullshit PR, eh, boys?

ND
______________
** although one-time Energy Secretary Amber Rudd – remember her? – announced this was going to change …  We can but hope.



Source: http://www.cityunslicker.co.uk/2017/03/reflections-on-piece-of-bullshit-pr.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.