Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Impact Dating Methods Questioned by New Survey

Wednesday, October 21, 2015 14:53
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

A new research study has questioned whether modern methods for dating meteorite impacts on Earth are factually accurate.

Far in the Earth’s past, there were two cataclysmic events that helped form both our home and our moon. Figuring out when these events occurred has in the past been a function of analyzing crystallized zircons left over from these events, with these studies positing that the event which formed our moon occurred roughly 50 million years into the life of our planet. Additionally, another set of cataclysmic events in the form of a number of impacts that turned the surface of the Earth into a nightmarish hellscape are thought to have occurred around 4 billion years in the past, also according to zircon analysis.

Both the bombardment and the earlier super-collision that created the moon are widely accepted as fact, though there’s little in the way of definitive proof of the events. This has made discovering additional information a priority for geoscientists, especially when it comes to re-examining the zircons retrieved from NASA’s lunar missions 40 years ago, as well as those discovered on Earth. One such study, which examined zircons left behind by a massive meteorite strike in what would one day become modern-day South Africa, has questioned the methods used in the past to date these impacts.

The major problem in dating zircons is that they have been separated from the rocks they formed within. These “ex situ” zircons make it impossible to corroborate impact evidence, according to Aaron Cavosie, a Geoscience professor from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a member of the NASA Astrobiology Institute. The scientist confirmed in a recent press release from the university that zircon is indeed ideal for dating a number of geological processes, although using ex situ zircon is problematic in dating large impacts of known ages. Even zircons displaying evidence of shock from a meteorite impact lack “critical contextual information” if they became separated from their host rocks in the process, Cavosie added.

Zircons can be used as a tool to date events thanks to the presence of uranium, which decays at a known rate and in turn accumulates lead isotopes within the crystal. Measuring these isotopes and comparing them to the known half-life of uranium provides researchers an avenue for determining a zircon’s age. Cavosie and his colleagues say that there’s a possibility that lead can be driven off during a meteorite impact, “resetting the clock” so to speak and recording exactly how long ago the impact occurred. As a result, such procedures have aided in pinpointing the later bombardment in the Earth’s past to anywhere between 3.9 billion to 4.3 billion years ago.

However, the possibility exists that zircons present during an meteorite strike may not get their “clock” reset reliably, according to the scientists’ research. A large number of the grains of zircon present at the time of the South African meteorite impact actually do not reflect its age. Instead they record the age of the rocks in which they were formed, which Cavosie remarked were around 1 billion years older.

For more information: www.geology.gsapubs.org

The post Impact Dating Methods Questioned by New Survey appeared first on New Historian.



Source: http://www.newhistorian.com/impact-dating-methods-questioned-by-new-survey/5135/

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.