Time Distortion Tests on 666 Machine Show ~ 400% Magnification of Reactive Input.
What this means in totality is that something considered and proved ineffient when air core transformers are compared to its iron ferromagnetic transformer counterpart, which is essentially a very lossy proposition has been challenged as the first charge forward to the new revolution established by the proper usage of air core resonant transformations. According to relativity traveling through space near light velocities will compress the time on the moving frame of reference to that of the non-moving one. A 20% time compression would mean that for one second of our time; the moving observer would experience one second of time in only 4/5ths of our time. Conversely from the moving and constricted frame of reference our time would be happening as the reciprocal of this, or 5/4ths of a second happening for every one of the moving observers seconds. This would also imply that if we could send energy (as electrical amperage) between the time frames, since wattage is expressed as joules of energy per second: and each second is not identical to each other: that more energy would come out from the expanded side then that which came from the constricted time side. We would literally be converting time into energy. But because the moving and non moving parts could not be connected together to exchange energy we need something called “localized relativistic effects” to accomplish this, and science does not accept this as being possible. Now with three phase electricity we can measure how far apart in time each phase is; and when all three measurements are added together they should add up to 360 degrees, simply because there are 360 degrees of time in the time circle. Here I have shown the degrees of time separation on the (primary) part that takes electricity from the three phase alternator and it shows an impossible ~290 degrees. (this is done with trigonometry predicting the shapes of the drawn out triangles from the three shown magnitudes). And according to theory and verifying that theory the other parts receiving that energy through space as secondaries reacting to the magnetic fields emited from the part displaying a localized relativistic effect of time compression; those parts will show more energy out then the amount put in by the primary system. It is literally the conversion of time into energy and 100 years after Einstein published his theory of relativity, I have now made a practical invention of the principle in which relativity is harnessed by moving magnetic fields in space, rather then actual moving physical parts in space.
Tests of the Unloaded 666 Machine and the loaded twin seriesed secondary loading show a conversion of time into energy. To convert time into energy you must first compress the time periods each side uses relative to their dual counterparts on the three phase process. The “theoretical” basis for measuring validation of this time distortion measurement is to first show that this method is valid. The method is probably similar to radio wave triangulation to find the location of emission of the waves. But here things are much simpler that that. For the time circle measurements three voltage meters are on three equal capacities of 13.6 uf connected in series with 1.5 ohms of pancake coil constructions enabling maximum mutual inductance between phasings where this 3 phase air core primary model is known as the 666 machine. By using a six voltage meter extrapolation of relative time periods between each capacitor being charged by series resonance established by seriesed reactive cancellations of measured quantities, the method of this enquiree can be verified by comparing the voltages referenced on each capacitor to that found between the inner sides of each capacitor being charged in the delta series resonant extraction. Thus the normal 360 degrees of time should be measured according to theory which is shown in the unloaded state. A capture for reference from the video (found from view of the last link on flicker commentary) we first note several snapshots from the video; here first showing the 8 volt input and q factors. https://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/23808367126/in/dateposted-public/ Now we show the 6 voltage meter extrapolation during open loadings of the primary system https://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/23206397184/in/dateposted-public/ And to verify the 20% time compression with primary currents we have https://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/23752164941/in/dateposted-public/ showing time distortion under secondary loadings at 8:24 Having verified our testing regimen the same wiring assembly is used for the conditions for an extra extraction from what the primary is provided by the presented secondary conditions. Several consequent considerations ensue in a zen like paradox that may be no paradox at all; because we have been trained in our thinking, it may appear to be. We can first measure the amount of energy transfer on the primary system by simply noting the amount of equal energy of each magnetic and electric field in oscillation. The mistake first made concerning comparisons is this; the reactive voltage times amperage comparisons between primary and secondary systems may show a wide gulf of extreme different values but this again is back to the understanding that apparent V*I measurements can be higher then the true power measurements made by I^2R calculations. What is meant by the paradox is this, in this example the secondary seemingly absorbs half the vibration from the primary system by measurements of amperage comparisons two amps drops to one under loading of the primary vibration. We would assume that the unloaded primary vibration is the maximum that can be obtained in the unloaded state exhibited by the delta series resonances. If we reduce the vibration in half by secondary absorptions made by mutual inductance, by normal energy transfer laws the amount first doled out must be cut in half as an example of maximum energy transfer principles. This would mean the amount of vibration measured on the sending part would equal that on the receiving part. And here the vibrations at first measured as being cut in half; the second side contains more energy transfer then the primary side sending the energy. In terms of reactive energy a magnification has occurred. The front stronger coil displays ~1400 volts lighting the xenon discharge with an amperage circulation of one fifth of an amp. The primary phase under this is sending in ~ 1 amp or so @ 9 volts. Thus reactive comparisons of primary/secondary VA numbers are 9*1= 1400* (.2)=1400/5 = 280. So nine VA goes in but 280 VA comes out. How can this be explained? It is an inaccurate measurement based on reactive quantities. So where does the truth lie? WE HAVE TO MEASURE AND COMPARE THE ENERGY TRANSFER IN BOTH THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SYSTEMS TO UNDERSTAND THE TRUE RATIO OF DELIVERY. For the electric field Energy in joules= (1/2)CV^2. Thus the voltages on the primary and secondary sides do not have a linear comparison but rather an exponential one. However even after this compensation factor is factored in to the calculations we see more reactive power going out then is going into the process, essentially what might be termed a “reactive power magnifier” for lack of a better term. 39% more true power will be emited from the secondary sources then a similar comparison of the primary sources. Taken from final moments from https://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/23636379720/in/dateposted-public/
“What is meant by the paradox is this, in this example the secondary seemingly absorbs half the vibration from the primary system by measurements of amperage comparisons two amps drops to one under loading of the primary vibration. We would assume that the unloaded primary vibration is the maximum that can be obtained in the unloaded state exhibited by the delta series resonances. If we reduce the vibration in half by secondary absorptions made by mutual inductance, by normal energy transfer laws the amount first doled out must be cut in half as an example of maximum energy transfer principles. This would mean the amount of vibration measured on the sending part would equal that on the receiving part. And here the vibrations at first measured as being cut in half; the second side contains more energy transfer then the primary side sending the energy. In terms of reactive energy a magnification has occurred.”
It may appear that once again the exponential relationship has mistakenly been applied as a linear one. This then itself would explain WHY the secondary oscillation appears greater then the primary one. The “confusion” comes in here with the statement that the vibration has been cut in half. The energy in the magnetic field is E=(>5)LI^2. In terms of the amount of vibration we use the amperage as that definition. So if the amperage is cut in half we have assumed that the energy input has also been cut in half. But actually the I squared term involving an exponential relationship means that cutting the I term in half will cut the primary energy to one quarter! Therefore this leaves the secondaries to absorb the remaining 3/4 amount of energy instead of what we thought should even steven.. Now if and where the initial amount of energy taken in the unloaded state is replicated in the loaded state, by division of energies appearing both on the primary and secondary this would explain why the secondary can contain three times the energy as the primary. .As things may turn out the unloaded primary state may be the highest energy input possible with these loads. Another set of calculations should be made from the inputs to make this comparison. HDN
In the ferromagnetic transformer case VI (in) = VI (out). This then is a transformation of reactive measurements where the gain of voltage by the secondary is accompanied a inversely proportional loss of amperage on the circuit. When three phase air core transformers are used in proper mutual inductance a situation where the reactive output can exceed the reactive input not only is possible, but is logical when the true parameters are shown. The whole issue becomes a confusion between a linear relationship and that of an exponential one. This is illustrated by the deception of the missing energy argument. If an energy stoarage as a capacitor is discharged to an equal capacitor, the energy content before and after is cut in half. Where did the missing energy go? When the transformation is viewed from the linear side we have two changes that of the voltage and the equivalent change in capacity where C goes up by two, and V is cut in half. Now view in comparison to what is happening on the true power transfer side of things where an exponential relationship exists.(.5) C*V squared indicates the energy content. By transforming the situation where C is doubled and V squared is cut in half for equivalent transformations this means an entirely different thing on the energy side of the equation. Now cutting V in half reduces V squared four fold; and to compensate C is only doubled; creating the observation that half of the energy has been lost in the transformation. Now just imagine if we could manipulate this situation in reverse only here the ratios of capacitive change are 272/1.