| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility
This post comes to us from Planetsave.com. For more along these lines, visit Planetsave or some of its most popular categories: Global Warming, Science, Going Green Tips, Animals, or 10 Friday Photos.
Ever wonder where the climate deniers stand in the scientific community? Although it is not uncommon to see a news contributor (aka: research scientist) on one of the opinionated news outlets state the long-debunked nonsense that “human-caused global warming is not real,” these scientists almost always base their findings upon opinion and not peer-reviewed facts. (The sad part is they often influence many to believe they are correct without ever producing any peer-reviewed data to back up their denial.)
So what exactly does all the scientific peer-reviewed literature say about human-caused global warming?
After some lengthy research and sifting through thousands of scientific peer-reviewed literature, it looks like James Lawrence Powell may have the answer.
Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility – In One Pie Chart (via Desmogblog)
This is a guest post by James Lawrence Powell.* Polls show that many members of the public believe that scientists substantially disagree about human-caused global warming. The gold standard of science is the peer-reviewed literature. If there is disagreement among scientists, based not on opinion…
Top Image Credit: Global Warming Scientist via Shutterstock
2012-11-20 09:24:39
Source: http://planetsave.com/2012/11/19/why-climate-deniers-have-no-scientific-credibility/
Source:
