Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Read aguanomics http://www.aguanomics.com/ for the world’s best analysis of the politics and economics of water I’ve talked about the “proper” way to account for water diversions and consumption before (here and here).
In recent conversations with various water wonks at various conferences, I’ve thought more about the “proper” way to account for water flows. (Here’s the authoritative, scientific version of proper, H/T to CP.)
The main problem to worry about is over-allocations of diversions that can lead to rivers running dry.*
So here’s MY summary of how to handle diversions:
Bottom Line: It’s better to be conservative when accounting for the right to divert water. Radical (or “optimal”) accounting can result in a dry river and a lot of angry downstream neighbors.
** Beware and remember: A city may sell 100 units of water to customers while only consuming 10 units of water (via evaporation, runoff, etc.); the other 90 units may be cleaned and discharged at the wastewater treatment plant.
2012-12-04 12:20:45
Source: http://www.aguanomics.com/2012/12/accounting-for-water-flows.html