Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Aquanomics (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Lower Mainland decides to attend while Ottawa and Calgary Plan its Future

Tuesday, March 11, 2014 11:55
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cDovLzEuYnAuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tLy1CVUFLdHhXMmdVNC9VeGVBUm93bWVkSS9BQUFBQUFBQlJqUS9kcWJBbjVjYlpZby9zMzIwLzNyZF9iZWFjaC5qcGc=

Jonathan Hopkins writes:*

If you have ever visited the beach in Vancouver, you might find it hard to imagine increasing the number of oil tankers in English Bay by a factor of seven. This is precisely the increase in capacity that Calgary-based Kinder Morgan is seeking with a proposed $5.4 billion pipeline retrofit from Edmonton to Vancouver. Its not exactly shocking news given the pipeline fever spreading in almost every direction from Fort McMurray, but what I find very surprising is the hearing process of the National Energy Board. February 12th marks the last day that municipalities can file to secure a seat at the proceedings and represent the interests of their communities. Vancouver has declared its intentions to oversee the proceedings and joins other lower mainland and Fraser valley governments already registered. So basically, all the communities who will bear a majority of the risk if this project is approved are not automatically included?

The city of Vancouver’s local economy relies on safe and clear waterways for tourism and leisure industry revenue. The cities of the Fraser valley occupy among the most important agricultural lands in the province. A $5.4 billion pipeline expansion offers no more than a possible sixty new long-term employment opportunities in British Columbia. There appears to be a massive discrepancy between the risks and rewards here. Clearly the money isn’t staying in B.C., so how does the opportunity even exist for those affected the most to be excluded from this review? Well, apparently the NEB is completely satisfied with a perfunctory treatment of this issue: “The Board does not intend to consider the environmental and socio-economic effects associated with upstream activities, the development of oil sands, or the downstream use of the oil transported by the pipeline.”

Bottom Line: Somewhere in a sane universe, the affected communities are meeting with the province while Kinder Morgan and the NEB are filing paper work by the deadline to attend.


* These guest posts are from students in my resource economics class at Simon Fraser University. Please leave feedback on their logic, ideas and style and suggestions of how to improve.



Source: http://www.aguanomics.com/2014/03/lower-mainland-decides-to-attend-while.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.