Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
A friend of mine is a journalist who writes about scientific issues for major national publications. He recently wrote a piece trying to explain why some people doubt an established consensus in the physical sciences. One consensus he cites is that emissions of warming gasses pose a “serious threat.” Being conflated with critics of evolution and vaccines got under my skin, so I responded with the following email.
From: Caleb Rossiter
To:
Subject: Hi from Caleb, the luke-warmist
Dear _____: I just read your piece in ______ on doubters of a scientific consensus.You include with modern doubters of Darwin, Galileo, fluoride, and vaccines those of us who study the science, math models, and statistics of “climate change” and find little evidence of human-caused climate catastrophe.I think that our inclusion on that list is inappropriate at present.