Published GMO studies find no evidence of harm when corrected for multiple comparisons.

(Before It's News)

Abstract
A number of widely debated research articles claiming possible technology-related health concerns have influenced the public opinion on genetically modified food safety. We performed a statistical reanalysis and review of experimental data presented in some of these studies and found that quite often in contradiction with the authors' conclusions the data actually provides weak evidence of harm that cannot be differentiated from chance. In our opinion the problem of statistically unaccounted multiple comparisons has led to some of the most cited anti-genetically modified organism health claims in history. We hope this analysis puts the original results of these studies into proper context.

Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016 Jan 14:1-5. [Epub ahead of print]
Published GMO studies find no evidence of harm when corrected for multiple comparisons.
Panchin AY1, Tuzhikov AI1,2.

KEYWORDS:

GMO; Genetic engineering; genetic modification; health; safety; statistics; transgenic

@ Published GMO studies find no evidence of harm when corrected for multiple comparisons. – PubMed – NCBI:

• New Hampshire’s Struggling Mountain Towns Want To Know What Ted Cruz Will Do About Climate Change
• Flint, Detroit
• Naturally-Occurring El Niño Makes 2015 The Hottest Year On Record
• Mississippi Disaster Recovery Centers operates in five places
• California’s Attorney General Is Now Investigating Exxon
• 2015 Smashes Record for Hottest Year By A Record Amount–And 2016 May Top It
• How GMO Lobbyists Taught Me We’re Winning
• Will The Energy Department’s $220 Million Investment Revolutionize Electricity?
• Smug about your solar roof? Not so fast.
• Demand for fish bladder may wipe out world’s rarest porpoise – ‘The vaquita’s only hope for survival is that gill nets are permanently removed from its entire range in the Gulf of California’