Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By GMO Pundit (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Motivated reasoning: How public opinion gets polarised

Tuesday, September 6, 2016 1:44
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cHM6Ly8xLmJwLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbS8tY2ZHZllSRVdOdTAvVmNaNVhyNnNWSEkvQUFBQUFBQURQRmMvT3YwNW5XTUdUaTQxWDMwSS1nSHA0azQ1Q255LWxYT2dRQ1BjQi9zMzIwLzIwMTUtMDgtMDlfNy00OC00OSUyQkNoZW10cmFpbHMuanBn

How People Update Beliefs about Climate Change: Good News and Bad News

Abstract:      
People are frequently exposed to competing evidence about climate change. We examined how new information alters people’s beliefs. We find that people who doubt that man-made climate change is occurring, and who do not favor an international agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, show a form of asymmetrical updating: They change their beliefs in response to unexpected good news (suggesting that average temperature rise is likely to be less than previously thought) and fail to change their beliefs in response to unexpected bad news (suggesting that average temperature rise is likely to be greater than previously thought). By contrast, people who strongly believe that man-made climate change is occurring, and who favor an international agreement, show the opposite asymmetry: They change their beliefs far more in response to unexpected bad news (suggesting that average temperature rise is likely to be greater than previously thought) than in response to unexpected good news (suggesting that average temperature rise is likely to be smaller than previously thought). The results suggest that exposure to varied scientific evidence about climate change may increase polarization within a population due to asymmetrical updating. We explore the implications of our findings for how people will update their beliefs upon receiving new evidence about climate change, and also for other beliefs relevant to politics and law.
Keywords: Climate Change, Optimistic Bias, Motivated Reasoning

Cass R. Sunstein
Harvard Law School
Sebastian Bobadilla-Suarez
Affective Brain Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London
Stephanie C. Lazzaro
University College London – Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience
Tali Sharot
University College London – Affective Brain Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology

September 2, 2016

How People Update Beliefs about Climate Change: Good News and Bad News by Cass R. Sunstein, Sebastian Bobadilla-Suarez, Stephanie C. Lazzaro, Tali Sharot :: SSRN:



Source: http://gmopundit.blogspot.com/2016/09/motivated-reasoning-how-public-opinion.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.