Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Culture, Media and Sport – Fourth Report
Future of the BBCNo long-term future for BBC licence fee, MPs say
The TV licence does not have a long-term future and is likely to be replaced by a new levy within the next 15 years, a group of MPs has said.
The fee is “becoming harder and harder to justify” given changes in the media, according to the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee.
The MPs suggested every household could pay a new compulsory levy instead.
The BBC does not agree that the fee will have to be replaced, but accepts it will probably have to be modernised.
Committee chairman John Whittingdale said: “In the short term, there appears to be no realistic alternative to the licence fee, but that model is becoming harder and harder to justify and sustain.”
In light of changing technology and audience habits, the committee said “we do not see a long-term future for the licence fee in its current form”.
Any “profound changes” – such as abolishing the licence fee – should not be rushed, the report said. But it did say the BBC “must prepare for the possibility of a change in the 2020s.
The best alternative to the licence fee, the report concluded, would be a compulsory broadcasting levy paid by all households, regardless of whether they watch TV, or how they watch.
Such a system was introduced in Germany in 2013 and would do away with the need to detect and prosecute those who avoid buying a TV licence, the committee said.
“We recommend that as a minimum the licence fee must be amended to cover catch-up television as soon as possible.”
It should also no longer be a criminal offence to avoid paying the licence fee, the report said.
Other proposals made by the committee include:
- The BBC Trust should be abolished because it has mishandled crises like the Jimmy Savile scandal and is too close to the BBC management
- Instead, a new Public Service Broadcasting Commission should monitor the corporation’s performance, with an ultimate sanction of being able to withhold some funding from the BBC
- Media regulator Ofcom – not the BBC Trust – should be the final arbiter of complaints about the corporation’s impartiality and accuracy
- Part of the licence fee (or future broadcasting levy) should be used to support non-BBC public service broadcasting, such as local news and children’s programmes
- The planned BBC One +1 channel does not represent “public service value”, and the airwaves should be used for something else
- The BBC should no longer attempt to offer “something for everyone” and should not stray into areas that are well catered for by commercial broadcasters
- The BBC World Service must remain strong to ensure the UK does not lose ground to countries like China and Russia in the “global information war”