| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Fun Online Polls: Post-Brexit trade deals & Encryption
The results to last week's Fun Online Poll were as follows:
Post Brexit, the UK should…
Impose trade barriers and tariffs – 1%
Remain in the Single Market/EEA – 10%
Rejoin EFTA – 6%
Try and negotiate a custom deal with the EU – 10%
Revert to trading on WTO terms – 13%
Abolish trade barriers and tariffs unilaterally – 58%
Other, please specify – 2%
Good, I was with the majority on that one. Thanks to everybody who took part.
—————————
There has been some mumbling along the usual lines about whether the services like Whatsapp should be forced to provide the police with 'encrypted' messages if the police obtain a warrant. See e.g. PC World (the magazine, not the shop):
“It used to be that people would steam open envelopes or just listen in on phones when they wanted to find out what people were doing, legally, through warranty,” [Amber Rudd, Home Secretary] said “But on this situation we need to make sure that our intelligence services have the ability to get into situations like encrypted WhatsApp.”
Rudd told Sky News that end-to-end encryption has its place, but it is not incompatible with providing a system for law enforcement agencies to have access to information with a warrant, if absolutely necessary.”
I personally don't see a problem, surely we can accept that a judge can sign off a warrant to tap your 'phone, steam open your letters or search your house if the police make a reasonable case.
Why should Whatsapp messages be any different? That's far from saying that the police should be able to routinely view all messages, emails and so on. The police have always been able to obtain warrants to search houses – that has not led to a situation where they routinely enter people's houses on a whim and have a rummage, has it?
Vote HERE or use the widget in the sidebar.
Source: http://markwadsworth.blogspot.com/2017/03/fun-online-polls-post-brexit-trade.html
