If this is the best evidence they can provide, you have to be suspicious

In this day of cctv, social media, mobile phones (=cameras), in a place like Westminster, everything that moves all day is caught on camera.  Police operations depend on street cameras being observed inside control rooms, cameras which can see clearly who is who and exactly what they’re doing.  So there would be plenty of evidence to see had the terror attack taken place as they say it did.

This is the only video put out by the government.  The witness statements from Quentin Letts and others are very weak, expressing uncertainty about important details.

I see nothing which is convincing.

The casualties on stretchers show no pain in their faces.  The ones lying on the street look like they’ve all adopted comfortable positions.  Each one has a handler.  One put their shoes down neatly on the pavement alongside the road.

This is the only video evidence provided.

It’s all a big con.

This could easily be falsified footage.  You can’t make out a vehicle at all, only a blur, and the supposed woman falling/jumping from the bridge is not recognisable as a human shape.  I am sure others could add to my amateur observations.

Westminster false event fools Brits hook line and sinker