Profile image
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

If this is the best evidence they can provide, you have to be suspicious

Friday, March 24, 2017 0:50
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

In this day of cctv, social media, mobile phones (=cameras), in a place like Westminster, everything that moves all day is caught on camera.  Police operations depend on street cameras being observed inside control rooms, cameras which can see clearly who is who and exactly what they’re doing.  So there would be plenty of evidence to see had the terror attack taken place as they say it did.

This is the only video put out by the government.  The witness statements from Quentin Letts and others are very weak, expressing uncertainty about important details.

I see nothing which is convincing.

The casualties on stretchers show no pain in their faces.  The ones lying on the street look like they’ve all adopted comfortable positions.  Each one has a handler.  One put their shoes down neatly on the pavement alongside the road.

This is the only video evidence provided.

It’s all a big con.

This could easily be falsified footage.  You can’t make out a vehicle at all, only a blur, and the supposed woman falling/jumping from the bridge is not recognisable as a human shape.  I am sure others could add to my amateur observations.

Westminster false event fools Brits hook line and sinker



Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.