Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
William K. Black On the Failure to Reform the Financial System
Courtesy of Jesse's Cafe Americain
I struggle quite a bit with his motives, constantly arriving at the conclusion that he is held captive by the system that rewarded and elevated him. Ignorance does not suffice, and moral cowardice does not seem appropriate. More likely is the expedient amorality of the modern managerial mind. The deal is what is important.
And sadly enough, there is no real alternative in Romney, who as the modern predatory financial manager will say or do anything to make the deal happen. And the pigmen are licking their lips at the thought that their man might take the reins.
This is the weakness of the two party system, and a Presidency that, excepting for the occasional impeachment, allows a President to reign for four years once he (or hopefully some day she) manages to persuade the electorate to accede in their ascendancy to power.
"The debate revealed that Obama does not stand for anything positive when it comes to the banksters or distressed homeowners. Geithner is not a banker or a technocrat. He is an American apparatchik who rose by attaching himself to powerful political patrons and telling them what they want to hear. That reflects badly on Obama.
Geithner gave Obama the answers Obama wanted to hear – we must not act against our largest donors (and Geithner’s most likely future employer), the banksters, by holding them accountable for their frauds because if we were to do so the economy would collapse. Geithner’s answer, which became administration policy, was to lie about the banksters’ role in causing the crisis and the financial condition of the banks.
Obama should hold Romney accountable for his endemic lies during the campaign and debate, but he would be in a better position to do so if he fired Geithner and Holder, ended his administration’s lies
2012-10-06 15:03:06