Profile image
By Points and Figures (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Stock Indexes and Success

Friday, March 10, 2017 6:49
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Today the jobs number will be released. It’s probably going to be a good number. The number has nothing to do with Trump being elected. He’s only 7 weeks in. Ramping up hiring takes a lot longer than that. Since Trump was elected, the stock market has been on a tear higher. However, Obama supporters will tell you he enjoyed a big stock market rally too. So will Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan supporters.

That should tell you two things. First, never go short America. Second, the stock market is a poor predictor of whether a President is successful or not.

A lot of people on Wall Street are unhinged.  They are shorting the rally because they are letting their political beliefs get in the way of judgment.  I have also seen this in other business silos.  I made the same mistake in 2009.  I let fear and angst consume me and I made some pretty bad trading decisions.

Expectations have certainly changed. The expectations would be far different if Hillary had won. I was speaking with my friend Joe Brusuelas last night. He is the Chief Economist for RSM.  You might see him on television occasionally.  He relayed a statistic to me that had me jumping out of my chair. During the Obama Presidency, at least 3000 new regulations hit the federal register. Those regulations are directly attributable to $850 Billion in dead weight economic loss. That’s shooting yourself in the foot. That’s one reason GDP was so terribly anemic under Obama.  I knew it was bad, but I didn’t know it was that bad.

Trump has pledged to get rid of a lot of unnecessary regulation.  I loved his executive order that for every new regulation, two have to be repealed.  Putting unbiased cost/benefit analysis into regulation writing will be very beneficial.  He’s also pledged to decrease corporate taxes.  That needs to be done and will help cure the dead weight loss problem. Heavy regulation and poor tax codes are two factors that help create income inequality.

How high can the market go if they redo regulation and redo taxes to make them more economically efficient?  No one knows.  The key is you can never be short America.  The market will be higher twenty years from now than it is today.

Dead weight loss is covered in the first week of any reputable Microeconomics course.  If you don’t know what dead weight loss is, here is the definition.  It is the loss of economic efficiency in terms of utility for consumers/producers such that the optimal or allocative efficiency is not achieved.  Deadweight loss can be stated as the loss of total welfare or the social surplus due to reasons like taxes or subsidies, price ceilings or floors, externalities and monopoly pricing. It is the excess burden created due to loss of benefit to the participants in trade which are individuals as consumers, producers or the government.  Here is a graph so you can visualize it.

An example of a government program creating deadweight loss is Obamacare.  Another example would be the ethanol subsidy.  Workers bear the cost of payroll taxes. There are scads of examples.  Our governments are riddled with them.

So today when the market goes up, it’s not because of Trump.  It’s because of market expectations.  If the market goes down, it doesn’t hate Trump.  It’s just altered expectations.


Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.