| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
New York: Federal Natl Mtg Assoc v Higgins – Different Signatures Despite Same Date on Note Reflecting Copies of Different Originals
Friday, June 17, 2016 8:18
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
HON. NOACH DEAR, J.S.C. Index No.:511643114 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOC, Plaintiff, -against- RICHARD HIGGINS et aI, Defendant, Upon the foregoing cited papers, the Decision/Order on this Motion is as follows: Plaintiff moves for summary judgment and an order of reference. Defendant opposes and cross-moves for dismissal arguing that Plaintiff lacks standing. “Where standing is put … Read more
Related posts:
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Stevens – An Assignee of Such a Mortgage Does Not Have Standing to Foreclose Unless the Assignment is Complete at the Time the Action is Commenced
- Supreme Court NY: BONY v Waters “Most disturbingly, Plaintiff presents the Court with two different versions of the note, one of which was altered and is not a true copy.”
- Shapiro and Fishman Fraudclosure | Two Copies of a Note, Different but the Same
Source: http://4closurefraud.org/2016/06/17/new-york-federal-natl-mtg-assoc-v-higgins-different-signatures-despite-same-date-on-note-reflecting-copies-of-different-originals/
