Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Be prepared for the next great transfer of wealth. Buy physical silver and storable food.
boilingfrogspost.com / By Sibel Edmonds / Wednesday, 1. May 2013
The series of our analyses on the Boston Bombing-Syria-Russia-CIA connections continues with further related developments unfolding in the last few days. In my April 22 interview for Boiling Frogs Post EyeOpener Report I provided three possible US objectives associated with the Boston Terror incident. I emphasized the first possible scenario as the most likely: Removing Russia as the obstacle in invading Syria. I pointed out that to achieve this objective a back-door deal could have been struck with Russia. What sort of a deal? Here is what I hypothesized:
1-Our Back-Door Deal with Russia on Syria: Our soon-to-come Invasion of Syria immediately following the Boston Terror incident with Russia removing itself as an obstacle
2-Rise in “Radical Islamic Terror” in Russia’s Caucasus-mainly in the Chechnya and Dagestan region
3-Per Washington’s consent a major Russian crack-down in the Caucasus- US-Western governments support attributing this to Russia’s contribution in countering Global Islamic Terrorism
In my analyses of Boston Terror-CIA-Syria-Caucasus & Central Asia connections I have been emphasizing the need of a ‘Face-Saving’ ingredient for Russia in implementing its back-door deal with the United States. With the US placing the Caucasus and Central Asia on the map as the new hot-bed of radical terrorists and Russia’s ‘needed’ role in cracking down on the factions in the region, and with creating the face-saving scenario for Russia on its support of Syria.
Last week we had the Syria Chemical Weapons accusations a la Iraq surfacing, and that followed by Obama dialing Russia:
In a statement, the White House said on Monday that Mr Obama and Mr Putin talked on the phone on Monday, with the US leader “underscoring his concern over Syrian chemical weapons”…He warned that it would be a “game changer” for US policy if the reports about chemical weapons were to be proved true.
Thanks to BrotherJohnF
2013-05-01 17:17:38