Tweets by realDonaldTrump

Online:
Visits:
Stories:

By Borderland Beat
Contributor profile | More stories

Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

RULING: Aquilla Sel Defense Defended Themselves, Because State Failed their Duty

Sunday, July 13, 2014 9:58

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Borderland Beat from Aristegui Noticias Translated by Jane Brundage Mexico Voices

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cDovLzIuYnAuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tLy1iNVhkQnZTRlNGdy9VOEZ1c0k3SldwSS9BQUFBQUFBQVZ4ay9rbzZjMEZUSmltZy9zMTYwMC9hZ3VpbGxhK2RldGFpbm1lbnQrYXJyZXN0LmpwZw==

Leonel Rivero, attorney for three imprisoned self-defense members from Aquila, says a judge has decided to discontinue legal proceedings against the defendants who are accused of carrying weapons for the exclusive use of the Army. This, after it was demonstrated that they were defensing their right to life because the State failed to guarantee their security.

In an interview with [Carmen Aristegui on] MVS News First Edition, Rivero explained that Ephraín, Augustine and Vicente Villanueva would nonetheless remain imprisoned in Michoacan, because they also face charges of kidnapping.

The lawyer hailed the judge's decision to present non-accusatory conclusions [i.e., to acquit] for bearing arms, after Rivero presented a sociological study that demonstrated the incapacity of the various governments [federal, state, municipal] to ensure their security.

Now, he said,

“they have pending legal procedures, allegations of kidnapping made by employees of territorial bosses for The Knights Templars; accusations that, so far, keep them detained at Mil Cumbres Prison in Morelia [capital of Michoacán].”

Rivero pointed out that the evidence submitted [by the defense] stated that citizens give up some of their freedoms in order that the State might guarantee public security; however,

“we demonstrated that the three levels of government had not fulfilled their obligation.”

The attorney argued that community members

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cDovLzQuYnAuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tLy1qMmZnNloyMC1XNC9VOEZ1NUE2eE0wSS9BQUFBQUFBQVZ4cy9pbjByR0E0eHBuRS9zMTYwMC9jYXN0aWxsbytCQjIwMTQucG5n

“had turned to government agencies, but these had paid no attention [to their requests].”

Rivero pointed out that the three “had chosen to violate that principle” (referring to the ban on carrying weapons restricted to Army use) given the fact that the right to life did not exist [in their community]. Rivero stated:

“It was essentially that ruling on the sociological issue that determined (dismissal of the legal process); there is no possibility that the legal process for weapons carrying might be reactivated.”

Commissioner Alfredo Castillo's Lawyers

Leonel Rivero disclosed the existence of “the lawyers of Alfredo Castillo,” in reference to what the federal official has apparently mobilized to deal with the self-defense cases, without their having achieved their release up to now.

The defense attorney said that, at first, he defended 18 self-defense prisoners from Aquila, of whom 15 were convinced [to sign an agreement] by lawyers presumably sent by the federal government official [Alfredo Castillo Cervantes, Commissioner for Public Security and Comprehensive Development of Michoacán].

MV Note: On May 14, 2014, Rivero described this agreement:

“Despite the fact that the defense 'has complied with all parts of the agreement, on May 12 lawyers Jorge Espino, Antonio Pacheco and Juan Carlos Escobar interviewed Augustín, Ephraín and Vicente Villanueva in Mil Cumbres prison. The lawyers indicated to them that they were representing the Commissioner and that if they [defendants] revoked their lawyers and disowned the agreement that the [Aquila] community had made with the Commissioner and, in turn, signed the [self-defense] demobilization agreement, they would be released within 20 days'.” [Emphasis added]

Rivero adds:

“Lawyers who have ostensibly presented themselves as representatives of Castillo … told them that they guaranteed their freedom in 15 days; it is clear that they [lawyers] had government support because otherwise they would not have been able to enter a federal prison.

“They permitted me to meet with all those facing charges and offer them that proposal (to release them) [but] we were not able to meet with everyone; that requires the existence [of permission] of a higher authority.”

Although he succeeded in getting the dismissal of at least one of the charges faced by his clients (who remain in prison), Rivero rejected the notion that he would again take up the defense of the other cases.

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cDovLzMuYnAuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tLy12eE5ubmxSV0dJMC9VOEZ2QjFrWnFlSS9BQUFBQUFBQVZ4MC9iRkM5M2cxN3ptWS9zMTYwMC9hcXVpbGxhKzIucG5n

Source: http://www.borderlandbeat.com/2014/07/ruling-aquilla-sel-defense-defended.html

Comments

Newsletter

Email this story