Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Sanjeev Sabhlok's Occasional Blog-Liberty (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Hindu Capitalism #11. How Max Weber got it TOTALLY wrong

Sunday, August 19, 2012 7:50
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Here's a note from an article entitled, “Udipi Hotels: Entrepreneurship, Reform and Revival”, by Stig Toft Madsen and Geoffrey T. Gardella, published in Curried Cultures: Globalization, Food, and South Asia  By Krishnendu Ray, Tulasi Srinivas (May 2012, University of California Press).

EXTRACT
Max Weber was disinclined to believe that capitalism would have any future in India. Indians, he argued, would be incapable of running modern industries in an efficient and nonpredatory manner on account of the Hindu “law of rituals.” 

When Milton Singer studied Madras entrepreneurs, he realized that Weber was wrong. According to Singer, modernization among these entrepreneurs was helped along by a series of adaptive strategies. These strategies enabled industrial leaders to thrive in the modern world without unbearable mental strains resulting from a failure to conform to inherited notions of purity.

To account for the coexistence of Hinduism and capitalism, Singer developed the notion of “compartmentalization.” The industrialists in Madras, he argued, did not experience a clash between their identity as Hindus or Brahmins and their identity as industrialists because these two roles were compartmentalized or separated into different life-worlds (Singer 1972: 320-25).

In 2000, when John Harriss restudied some of the same entrepreneurial families that Singer had interviewed, he found the notion of compartmentalization misleading (Harris 1003). Instead, Harriss observed a similar interpenetration between capitalism, Hinduism, and Hindutva politics that we have drawn attention to, namely, politicized Hindu capitalism without compartmentalization. Thus, a Great Tradition that modernizes, globalizes, and secularizes is also likely to Brahmanize and revitalize as it stands forth.

[Sanjeev: I believe all these writers are confused since they are using either statist (Weberian) or Marxist paradigms about Hindu capitalism. They are looking for something that simply doesn't exist. These perspectives on Indian capitalism and business classes are fundamentally flawed. The Indian businessman is rooted in an ANCIENT culture that values (even worships) wealth, particularly gold, and believes that wealth is just one of the many things needed in life. There is NO CONTRADICTION between Hinduism and capitalism. There is nothing to explain!]

References

Harriss, John, 2003, “The Great Tradition Globalizes: Reflections on Two Studies of ‘The Industrial Leaders’ of Madras” in Modern Asian Studies 37, 2: 327-62.

Singer, Milton, 1972, When a Great Tradition Modernizes. An Anthropological Approach to Indian Civilization, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.