Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By goldenmean (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Inching Towards Real North American Energy Security

Tuesday, January 22, 2013 14:02
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

In 2011 President Obama instructed the U.S. State Department to try to find a new route for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline citing environmental concerns. The concerns were especially related to a potential contamination of the Ogallala aquifer.

Ogallala Aquifer; Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogallala_Aquifer

Ogallala Aquifer; Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogallala_Aquifer

This is an important groundwater source and therefore it makes sense to bypass the most sensitive areas as much as possible. The $7 billion project would carry millions of barrels of bitumen extracted from Canada’s oil sand deposits in Alberta to the U.S. Gulf Coast refineries equipped to handle heavy oil. Please refer for more on that and oil sands in general to my earlier blog post “The Nexus between the Keystone XL Pipeline and Bending the CO2 Emissions Curve Downwards in the Long Term“.

Just today an important step into the right direction – that is, only if you believe that Canada in combination with the Bakken oil is crucial for future U.S. energy “self-sufficiency” – was taken by Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman who approved TransCanada’s Keystone XL 1,180-mile pipeline route through his state. Now the focus shifts to Washington, D.C. where the project awaits federal approval. Here we have a chance to actually create “good jobs” in a booming industry while at the same time increasing our future leverage vis-a-vis less friendly oil-producing countries across the globe. You want better living conditions and freer societies around the world? Bring down the price of oil! Less oil revenue may eventually loosen the grip on power various authoritarian regimes currently hold because these governments will then lack the monetary resources to cover up internal societal problems. By the way, a lower oil price will also spur our economic growth given the huge impact of transportation costs on prices of consumer goods.

We now have to monitor what President Obama will do. To borrow Will Oremus‘ phrase and expand on it: Is President Obama willing to “[sacrifice] the economy at the altar of [excessive] environmentalism”? We shall see. Also keep a close eye on the upcoming U.S. Senate confirmation hearings of John Kerry slated to become the next U.S. secretary of state.  The Senator seems to have a devotion for environmental issues as his track record reflects. However, he also seems to understand that Canadian oil sands will play a crucial role in America’s energy future as his current investments in two Canadian oil (sands) companies – Suncor and Cenovus Energy – show. We need to do both embrace reasonable environmentalism and at the same time steer clear of “excessive environmentalism”.



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.