Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:

By Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories

Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Press release: ex-parte motion to expedite is submitted in CA

Sunday, September 23, 2012 1:10

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Farrar order denying motion to quash subpoenas

Press release

Law Office of Orly Taitz

Ex parte motion to expedite preliminary injunction is submitted in CA

See motion attached below

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ.

29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy Suite 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

Phone (949) 683-5411 fax (949) 766-7603

Email: [email protected]

CA Bar license 223433

Counselor for Plaintiffs

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

REMOVED FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

CALIFORNIA CASE 30-2012-00582135 originally captioned as Taitz v Obama, Feinstein, Emken et al

Keith Judd,

Orly Taitz,

Thomas G. MacLeran,

Leah Lax,

David Farrar

Larry Rappaport,

Lucien Vita

Carol Vita

Plaintiffs,

barack obama , in his capacity as a candidate on the ballot for the us president in 2012 election

Natalie E. Tennant, in her capacity of West Virginia Secretary of State;

Debra Bowen, in her capacity of California Secretary of State;

Brian P. Kemp, in his capacity of Georgia Secretary of State;

William M. Gardner, in his capacity of New Hampshire Secretary of
State;

NANCY PELOSI in her capacity of the Chairwoman of the 2008 Democratic National Convention and Signor of the Certificate of Nomination for Candidate for President Obama;

MICHAEL ASTRUE in his capacity as the Commissioner of SSA;

WILLIAM A. CHATFIELD

In his capacity as former Director of the Selective Service;

ALVIN ONAKA in his capacity as

registrar of the Health Department of Hawaii;

JANET NAPOLITANO in her capacity as Secretary of Department of Homeland Security;

ERIC HOLDER in his capacity as Attorney General of the USA;

BRIAN SCHATZ in his capacity as 2008 Chairman of the Democratic party of Hawaii and Signor of the Certificate for Presidency for Barack Obama;

LYNN MATUSOW in her capacity as 2008 Secretary of the Democratic party of Hawaii and Signor of the Certificate for Presidency for Barack Obama

ALICE TRAVIS GERMOND in her capacity as a secretary of the 2008 Democratic Nominating Convention;

OBAMA FOR AMERICA;

Ballot Law Commission OF

STATE OF HEW HAMPSHIRE;

Board of directors of California Republican party;

Dean C. Logan in his capacity as Los Angeles county registrar,

ELIZABETH EMKEN in her capacity as a candidate on the ballot;

DIANNE FEINSTEIN in her capacity as a candidate on the ballot;

CLAY D. LAND in his capacity as a Federal Judge, Central District of Georgia;

John Avlon, in his capacity as a reporter for Daily Beast;

Chris Matthews in his capacity as a host of MSNBC;

MSNBC

FORBES Magazine;

Kevin Underhill in his capacity as a reporter for Forbes Magazine;

Clearchannel communications;

KFI AM 640;

John and Ken Show;

John Kobelt;

Patrick R. Donahoe in his capacity as Post Master General and Chief Executive Officer of United States Postal Service;

John Does and Jane Does

1-100; Defendants

)

)Case No.:12-cv-1507

EX-PARTE mOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO HAVE AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY HEARD EX/PARTE OR ON A SHORTENED RESPONSE SCHEDULE

Argument

Ex parte relief should be granted if the evidence shows “that the moving party’s

cause will be irreparably prejudiced if the underlying motion is heard according to regular

noticed motion procedures.” Mission Power Eng’g Co. v. Continental Cas. Co., 883 F.

Supp. 488, 492 (C.D. Cal. 1995).

Plaintiffs incorporate by reference their First Amended Complaint and exhibits to the First Amended Complaint (Hereinafter “FAC”) as if fully pled herein.

FAC shows evidence of massive elections fraud that requires immediate attention.

1. Affidavits of Computer analyst David Yun shows that there are at least one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the current voter roll of the Secretary of State of California. In order to prevent elections fraud CA Elections Code 2150 require electors to provide their personal information in 8 different areas, such as name, birth date, prior voter registration, state where they were born or if born abroad, a country where they were born. Affidavits of David Yun show that there are 756,213 voter registrations in the Current Voter Roll of the California Secretary of state without required information on the State of Birth, 898 without the first name, 757 without the birth date and so on. Second affidavit by David Yun shows 685,739 where U.S. or U.S.A. (Exhibit 1 herein, Exhibit 18 FAC) Additionally, an e-mail from the office of the Los Angeles registrar represents an admission against interest of the defendants, where the employee admitted to falsification of records, stating that employees themselves wrote in the registration records “US” where the state of birth was missing. (Exhibit 2 herein, Exhibit 29 First amended complaint)There are 685,739 where U.S. or U.S.A was posted in the records. Even if the employees of the Registrar were not to admit to forgery and falsification of records, these registrations would not be valid, as according to Election code 2150 one needs to fill in a STATE where he was born, not just USA. Only if he was born abroad, the elector can post the name of the country. Based on this one criteria alone, without taking into consideration the other 7 areas of required information there are 1,441, 942 invalid voter registrations, nearly one and a half million invalid voter registrations. Taitz was a candidate for the U.S. Senate in 2012 primary election. The difference between her and candidate Emken, who was second and proceeded to 2012 General election was only 450,000 votes. The number of invalid voter registrations in only one of 8 categories is three times higher than Emken’s margin of victory. If an emergency stay of the CA Senatorial General election is not issued, pending removal from the voter rolls of all the invalid voter registrations and revote, Taitz will be irreparably harmed. Considering the proximity of the election, ex-parte hearing or an expedited hearing is warranted.

Additionally, both candidates, who proceeded into the top 2 general election: Senator Feinstein and the Republican Candidate Emken were served with the complaint on July 10, when the complaint was originally filed in the state court. They did not respond yet and chose to ignore the complaint believing that no judge will have the strength of character to stay the Senatorial election and that every judge will do what is usually done in elections fraud cases: find some lame excuse to dismiss the complaint. As Senator Feinstein has a much higher number of votes than Emken, the only defendant, who can be affected by the Ex-Parte is Emken, and she had over 2 months notice already and cannot claim detriment by ex-parte.

2. Plaintiff Keith Judd is a Candidate for the U.S. Presidency, who got 40% of the vote in West Virginia Primary. Judd has standing to seek an ex-parte hearing as exhibits 1-35 of the FAC show overwhelming evidence that the winner of the WV Democratic primary, Barack Obama, placed his name on the ballot by fraud and using forged Selective Service certificate, forged birth Certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which according to E-verify and SSNVS was never assigned to Obama, but is being used by him as his verification of identity as late as in April 15, 2010, as posted on his tax returns. If ex-parte hearing is not held, due to upcoming 2012 General Presidential election Judd’s rights as a candidate will be irreparably harmed. On the other hand, the only defendant, who would be affected by such ex-parte is Defendant Obama. He cannot be possibly harmed by such order, as he was served here and was served to appear in court in similar cases and he simply arrogantly chose to be in contempt of court and not appear. Exhibit 3 herein represents an order by a Deputy Chief administrative Judge of the State of Georgia, Michael Malihi in response to a motion by Obama to quash subpoenas issued by Attorney Taitz. Malihi ruled in Taitz favor and upheld the subpoenas issued by Taitz for Obama and other officials to appear in court and submit his identification papers. Obama decided to go behind the back of the presiding judge and on the eve of the hearing Obama, through his attorney Michael Jablonski, submitted a letter to the Secretary of State of Georgia, Brian Kemp, asking him to take the case away from the Deputy Chief Administrative Judge Malihi as he (Obama) is supposedly suffers from Taitz. Secretary of State Kemp responded that if Obama boycotts the hearing and does not show up, he is doing so in his own peril. Obama and Jablonski did not show up and did not provide any documents. Similarly, Obama was subpoenaed to appear at the elections Commission hearing in the state of Indiana, where Taitz presented evidence of forgery in his IDs. Obama boycotted this hearing as well. A hearing on the Indiana challenge is scheduled for September 26, 2012, 1:30 pm in the Indiana Superior Court before Judge Sherry K Reid in Indianapolis, Indiana. Clearly, if Obama had any valid IDs, he would show up for the court hearings or he would have sent his attorneys with required documents. The only reasonable explanation why Obama is boycotting the court hearings, is because he knows that there is no legitimate reason or explanation for his use of a Connecticut Social Security number which was never assigned to him according to E-verify and SSNVS and there is no explanation or justification for hiding the original application for the Selective Service and Birth Certificate, when alleged copies were shown to be forgeries. As Obama boycotted prior hearings and showed a complete disrespect and contempt for the Court of Law, there is no reason to believe that he will act any differently and there is no reason not to grant the plaintiffs their motion for the ex-parte hearing or alternatively a motion for an expedited hearing on the motion to stay Obama’s placement on the ballot in general election or certification of his votes for the general election until the original identification papers are examined by experts in light of forgery in his alleged copies.

CONCLUSION

Motion for Stay/ Preliminary Injunction of the 2012 California Senatorial election, as well as 2012 Certification of Barack Obama as a Presidential candidate should be held ex-parte. In alternative such motion should be heard on expedited schedule to be set by the court.

Respectfully submitted

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

09.21.2012

Darrel Issa

Chairman of the House oversight committee

2157 Rayburn House Office Building,

Washington, DC 20515

Congressman Lamar Smith,

Chairman of the Judiciary Committee

House of Representative

2409 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515

Public Integrity Unit Department of Justice