More clarification about Obama-forgery, October 20, oral argument in 9th Circuit Court of Appeals

I also ask, if this another one of the usual ‘Obot’ judges

going to toss the case for lack of standing or another BS reason.

Also, are you involved in this case? it wasn’t clear from what I read.

Answer: It is my case in that I am the attorney representing all the plaintiffs. James Grinols was a Republican elector, who stated that he was prevented from serving as an elector due to fraud committed by Obama in using bogus IDs and a stolen SSN to get in the WH.

Another plaintiff was Keith Judd, who was a presidential candidate in 2012. He came second in West Virginia Democratic party primary with 40% of the vote. His claim is that he lost the nomination due to the fact that Obama is not eligible. Lower court judge, Hon Morrison C. England already ruled that he had standing as he had direct particularized injury, however Judge England ruled that even though Presidential Candidate Keith Judd had standing to proceed with the case and discovery, the judge incorrectly ruled that this is not a justiciable question because only Congress can impeach the president. The judge completely twisted and misrepresented the facts in order to cover up crimes committed by Obama. In reality, the plaintiffs did not ask the court to impeach Obama  and the case was brought before Obama was confirmed by the electoral college, before the election results were confirmed by the Congress and before Obama was sworn in. A declaratory and injunctive relief would have stopped Obama in his tracks. Even today, if the Court of Appeals decides in the favor of the plaintiffs and we conduct the discovery, the evidence of bogus IDs will not only force Obama’s resignation, it will pave the way to nullifying executive orders and bills signed by Obama.

For 7 years we have seen treason and criminal complicity by the courts in aiding and abetting Obama, in refusing to hear the case on the merits using one bogus excuse after another. Will this court be different? I don’t know. It will be a panel of 3 judges. I don’t know yet who will they be, I don’t know who appointed them. Frankly, I saw criminality and treason by judges appointed by both Democrat and Republican presidents, it doesn’t matter that much.

All I can do is, be there, at the field of battle, fight, as hard as I can, and hope that one day justice, decency and allegiance to the oath of office and to this nation will prevail. I am asking my supporters to spread the word. and send thin notification to all media outlets. Sadly, publications, who claim to be unti-establishment,  did not publish any information on my cases, as they are either afraid of Obama or they seek financial gains and publish only nformation about cases, where attorneys pay them a share for advertising. The pyblic needs to know about this case, they need to know the truth, particularly now, when Obama is pushing terrible Iran-nuclear weapons agreement. Please, contact Hannity, Limbaugh, WND and other. And, please, donate to my work

See the schedule below.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Calendar for James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse, San Francisco Oral Argument Notice

2015-10-20  9:00 am  Courtroom 2, 3rd Floor Rm 330, James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse, San Francisco
Case No. Title Nature Origin Time / Side
12-70442 Amandeep Kaur v. Loretta E. Lynch – A citizen of India petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of asylum, withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture, and adjustment of status. Immigration BIA 10 min
13-16564 Dennis Barnett v. Brian Duffey – A California state prisoner appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction for second degree robbery and assault with a deadly weapon. [5:08-cv-01604-RMW] Habeas N. CA 10 min
14-10080 USA v. Randly Begay – Randly Irvin Begay appeals his conviction and sentence for second-degree murder and discharging a firearm during a crime of violence. [3:13-cr-08073-NVW-1] Criminal AZ 10 min
13-16251 A. Copeland v. Raymond Lane – An appeal from the dismissal of an action under the Securities Exchange Act against Hewlett-Packard Company officers and directors. [5:11-cv-01058-EJD] Civil N. CA 15 min
13-16304 David Roberts v. PayPal – David Roberts appeals the district court’s summary judgment in his action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act regarding a text message sent to his cell phone by PayPal, Inc. [4:12-cv-00622-PJH] Civil N. CA 15 min
13-16359 James Grinols v. Electoral College – Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s dismissal of their action challenging President Barack Obama’s eligibility to run for the Office of the President of the United States in 2012 and alleging violations of California Elections Code § 2150. [2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD] Civil E. CA 15 min

Location Address

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse
95 Seventh Street
San Francisco CA 94103