Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
By Randy Fardal
When it comes to politics, Hollywood must be suffering cognitive dissonance right now.
Entertainers typically are left-wing ideologues, so it's natural for them to support a fellow traveler like Barack Obama. On the other hand, they also are professional storytellers, and Mr. Obama's story contains plot holes, poorly developed characters, implausible story twists, and no final act. His life seems like a remake of an obscure 1930s Russian box office flop.
As screenwriters like to say, every story has a beginning, middle, and end. The beginning introduces the protagonist and links him to the unfolding story with a triggering event. Complications ensue in the middle, and the protagonist reaches rock bottom. The end is the satisfying resolution of the story. That final act in the story's structure includes the climax and denouement — a period of calm, during which normalcy returns.
But Mr. Obama's story is a series of beginnings and middles, with no satisfying resolutions. There is no denouement — just endless chaos. Loose ends aren't tied up because nothing ever is seen through to its successful conclusion.
Here are a few examples:
Compare Mr. Obama's story with that of General Patton, as depicted in the highly praised 1970 biographical film bearing his name. Mr. Patton inherited messes in North Africa and the Battle of the Bulge, but he took charge and cleaned them up in record time. In contrast, Mr. Obama seeks to exploit every crisis for political gain, claims that he's in charge but just makes things worse, and then blames his predecessor.